If she is wrong, then she has sacrificed her career, her reputation, and any hope for a comfortable future.
Think on that and then decide if you're still worried she doesn't have the goods.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
If she is wrong, then she has sacrificed her career, her reputation, and any hope for a comfortable future.
Think on that and then decide if you're still worried she doesn't have the goods.
Sid could present circumstantial statistical data that to most people would “prove” fraud. The problem is it being circumstantial. Getting statistically ignorant judges to agree is going to be difficult. It would be a way to save face. She could claim the proof was there but the judges refused to see it for the rest of her career.