881
Comments (58)
sorted by:
26
codesherpa 26 points ago +26 / -0

It's easy to enforce laws against people who obey them. We've never been good at civil disobedience. Rallies and protests are not nonviolent civil disobedience, there is a huge difference. If the courts fail us, then nonviolent civil disobedience seems the only way forward. This is the same script as 1776. The founders first attempted to redress their issues with the King and his colonial governors. We didn't just jump right into revolution and warfare. Pleading with the King (courts) failed, then civil disobedience swept through the colonies for some time. What would civil disobedience even look like in 2020 or 2021?

6
Skogin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not wearing a shitty mask.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
synd1050 1 point ago +1 / -0

Boomer conservatives fell to the shenanigans of Neoconservatives and Northern conservatives whose brand of conservatism doesn't conserve anything.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
26
HeavenlyTrumpets 26 points ago +26 / -0

Police departments in large cities tend to have lots of corruption in terms of the department towing the political lines for their careers. Not saying every person is like that, but it's a rampant problem.

14
couranto 14 points ago +14 / -0

The left doesn’t want to just defund the police. They want to defund and then replace the police with leftist goons.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
DudeNoOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Al a Adolf style

9
deleted 9 points ago +12 / -3
8
weltbild 8 points ago +9 / -1

its because the mayors control them

11
Anaconda 11 points ago +13 / -2

"Just following orders" didn't work well for low level Nazis

4
weltbild 4 points ago +4 / -0

just following orders always works if you just win

3
maleitch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ask the Jews still haunting the gas chambers who it didn't work out for. So a few Nazi's went to trial. Big fucking deal. Some of you live in video game world where the good guy always wins and you get unlimited chances

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
6
weltbild 6 points ago +6 / -0

bad things are happening now and they have thrown out conservative observers everywhere they kneel to BLM and kick patriots

6
PatriotSkorzeny 6 points ago +9 / -3

So far, ZERO law enforcement is to be trusted.

5
Here_we_go 5 points ago +5 / -0

Backing the blue is giving them gigantic egos. Let them fight their own fight. They certainly not helping us.

4
GeorgeKirby 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pussies. Fuck them.

4
the_sky_is_falling 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you.

Someone is finally getting it.

Stop backing the blue cos the blue not got your back!

3
AngryAsian 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's because WE comply with them, and BLM/ANTIFA won't! Until we're willing to show the fat lards that are "just following orders" that they're fucking with the wrong group, they'll continue to harass and attack us!

3
PatriotPepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

In general, Conservatives are ‘good’ citizens; perhaps it’s time for Conservatives be ‘bad’ citizens.

3
petiteputnam 3 points ago +4 / -1

There's no law and order just OUR ORDER

Police have become just another tool for the left to use to assert their powers

2
Choppermagic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Freedom isn't free. B you have to fight always

1
bf4truth 1 point ago +1 / -0

KGB and gestaspo were police. Also that cop in the red county that dived into a burning car to save someone is a cop. Cops that earn respect will have my respect. I will support and even be alongside them if needed. But cops that spit on the constitution and "follow orders" to trash law-abiding citizens lives are scum and just as much an enemy as every other freedom-hating POS trying to butt into your life.

Try to avoid using a broad brush unless it is necessary. Assess where you live. My sheriff told the Governor to pound sand and isnt enforcing lock down orders soooo all good for now here.

1
The_One_True_Fett 1 point ago +1 / -0

They were rather tough in the beginning, for a short time. Then the machine turned against them, came after their paychecks, their pensions, and would give out their personal information.

If you were the chief and had to protect your men, that gives you a real tough decision morally. What to do?

1
Givesgunstogrannies 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nick ain't no bootlicker.

-3
Useful_Vidiots -3 points ago +5 / -8

Quoting Nick Fuentes? Fuck off, asshat.

1
diversityisghey 1 point ago +2 / -1

Imagine not liking Nick Fuentes.

2
synd1050 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuentes is Based and says what needs to be said. Maybe u/useful_Vidiots is charlie kirk TPUSA shill.

1
Useful_Vidiots 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's a piece of shit.

Here's who I've been for four years.

https://usefulvidiots.com/

-2
Useful_Vidiots -2 points ago +2 / -4

Imagine not being a hate-filled, knuckle-dragging moron. You can do it Mongo!

0
diversityisghey 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sounds like, by your own rhetoric, that applies to you:) low iq uneducated doggy

1
HeavenlyTrumpets 1 point ago +3 / -2

He's right.

-2
Useful_Vidiots -2 points ago +2 / -4

Well so was Hitler, on some shit. Your point?

1
BasteSpuds 1 point ago +2 / -1

Drawing a contrast between Fuentes and Hitler? Fuentes is a neocon. I don't like him either. But..

I'm old enough to point out a fuck ton of times the left and right calls someone they don't like "hitler"

It's tired, played out, intellectually lazy and not even a good comparison on any level. I just wish people would stop being so lazy, that's all they come up with.

On this matter Fuentes is correct. It is possible for someone you don't care for to say something you agree with. Who'd have thought? I'm sure Biden likes Dr Pepper. I like Dr Pepper. I'm not going to call you hitler because you say Dr Pepper sucks.

1
Useful_Vidiots 1 point ago +2 / -1

It was a fucking exaggeration to make a point.

1
BasteSpuds 1 point ago +2 / -1

I get that. It's just old

2
Useful_Vidiots 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well I'm no spring chicken.

-3
Anaconda -3 points ago +3 / -6

Nick Fuentes hates Jews more than he does Muslims and Chicoms. He is pathetic.

2
synd1050 2 points ago +2 / -0

he doesn't hate jews. He calls out the establishment of globalists and neocons who are mostly jews. Why are you guys so afraid of jews here? There are good jews but the Jewish establishment in America and the West always promote anti-white stuff every time.

1
HeavenlyTrumpets 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don't listen to him all the time, but I've never gotten that vibe from him...

1
synd1050 1 point ago +1 / -0

which ethnicity shills the most for open borders and mass immigration in western countries? which group operates the MSM that spreads the most anti-white propaganda? Fuentes is friends with Laura Loomer, Ashley Goldenberg, and Faith Goldy who are Jews or have Jewish heritage.

-3
Useful_Vidiots -3 points ago +3 / -6

Racists, anti-semites etc. always think they are subtle. But they're too stupid to know how obvious they are. Absolute Dunning-Krugers.

2
diversityisghey 2 points ago +3 / -1

We don't use the term racist or anti semetic around here. Those are gay words with no meaning.

-1
Useful_Vidiots -1 points ago +2 / -3

We

LMAO!

1
maleitch 1 point ago +3 / -2

Bitch using marxist cult terms like the lefts favorite "racism". You talk like fucking leftist cunt.

0
Useful_Vidiots 0 points ago +2 / -2

Why hello, Mr. Dunning-Kruger. Or as I always called it... "too stupid to know you're stupid."

1
maleitch 1 point ago +3 / -2

You never called it shit. You read this shit on some site like reddit because it was parroted by some other easily influenced online pussy. Now call me another marxist cultist term like the low iq useful idiot you admit to being. Are you officially certified to call someone the cult term "racist". Who certified you?

0
Useful_Vidiots 0 points ago +2 / -2

You seem mental.

1
maleitch 1 point ago +3 / -2

Haha... Yeah we are the ones too stupid to know we are stupid, as brainwashed little kids like you actually use marxist cult terms against those actually fighting.

You are like the low iq fundamentalists who screamed sinner at anyone they disapproved of but could not define in normal terms why.