No. Bc for as bad as Mittens is/was/would have been; he would still have been forced by a Republican Senate, to not put the open Marxists/Lefties on the Supreme Court. The Establishment Justices and Judges would have been in instead of Obama Judges/Justices. [Spez And as others have noted, Mittens likely wouldn't have even been the nominee either, bc honest primaries too.]
Gotta speed this up young pollywogs, or else don't say, like years ago on TDspezdit I didn't give plenty of warning on where we are now, and what's coming.
Time-travelling, autist, nimble-navigator, VSG, Redpilled solutions to all this stuff,
Mittens is a different side of the same coin. The judges he would have appointed would be no different than the activist judges (just less apparent in their motive). The establishment RINO types are the same ones refusing to fight against this election fraud. Even a Bush appointed judge threw out the Trump lawsuit in a state.
And we never would have got Trump, which means we would still be in an environment of choosing RINOs vs Democrats, with the same end goal (Great Reset).
The judges would have been different. They are the ones with multi-generational ties to the Swamp/DC; which the Establishment supports fully. DJT still himself, has to pick at least half of his judges from this same batch, and only gets a non-Establishment pick like every other time. It's too much political capital to do otherwise. And these Republican swamp judges are WAY better than leftie judges & justices.
It's pretty simple, to play the alternate time-line of not having Lefties/Marxists cheat elections... depending on how far back you want to go.
We could go back to Marxist-Anarchist killing President McKinley, making the way for "progressive TR". Or to T. Roosevelt and the Bull Moose Party to get W.Wilson to get The FED & the US into WW1. Or to FDR particularly his 1940 3rd term election to get the US into WW2.
Or to 1960 where Nixon would have won over JFK (thus no LBJ, no Vietnam, no 1965 nonsense Immigration Bill, and tons of other things; no opening up to Commie China)
Then in 1968 maybe Goldwater or in 1972-1980 R.Reagon would have won, no leftie violence in the streets, commies fully cleaned out of colleges/hollywood/media stopping their Long March through the institutitons, no massive debts required, paid for space program with no breaks/no brakes, maybe even done a few things like repealed income tax, The Draft, & The FED.
Then likely in 1980 perhaps a younger Dole/Perot or Dole/Paul term. Then could have even had someone like a younger DJT, to keep MAGA going for another 8 years. Etc.
...
[GEOPOLITICAL Redpill, you can't unsee once you see it.] The goal (by the Dems/globalists/marxists/interventionists) as an example, who got the US into Vietnam, was to deplete the US, and our resources, grind up American Patriots & local (Vietnamese) Patriots & monarchy; thus the marxists here in the US and in Vietnam could rise with less competition to power.
Same thing in other countries too, like China in the '40s; WW1, WW2, Post 9/11 etc. All over the map for 120 years now (including Russia 1917, etc.). Most of the entire 20th Century warfare and conlfict, and still today in 2020, is this.
Marxists start crap, escalation, countries fighting over some other pretense with the help of Marxists in power in those countries controlling policy/news/etc. And when a country or monarchy is weakened from war, the other marxists strike either overtly, or Long March through the Institutions; and the map grows in marxism both internationally and WITHIN countries.
Media is but one institution which has fallen to the Long March through the Institutions.
Faux news being the last of the big 4 networks, to sink under the waterline.
The marxists take over an insitutiton, and use it; and when it no longer serves their purposes, they burn it to the ground. Ceding institutions to the commies is not a winning strategy, nor is speeding an institutions' destruction a real solution. Calling Marxism out for what it is, don't let them hide behind dozens of labels.
Things incoming like the CRT BAN, 1776-Commission, and many other things will turn the tide; but it's going to take a lot of work by a lot of people to rebuild the institutions. Everything from: Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Methodist & Catholic Churches, Professional Sports, Hollywood, Media, Schools/Colleges/Universities, PTAs, Silicon Valley, gov agencies, etc.
So marxists are yet again, trying to raise the water temperature to "boil"; which is why the marxists have some of their skirmishers doing point-blank assassinations in front of video cameras. And if they get their way, this wont be peaceably resolved, which will allow the marxists to grow, yet again, internationally between countries, and within countries.
We really need to speed up, to head them off where it matters most, hence my constant spam. As link to my post in my comment above.
Election fraud was in play for sure, but don't forget that Romney basically threw the second and third debates after winning the first and was an uninspiring RINO. Romney is a globalist, a member of the Cabal, and was probably just a placeholder, a fake opponent to give the illusion of a real election.
Joe did say that they had done it for the Obama/Biden administration, going on to talk about the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in US history.
Yeah, I believe so. I was extremely surprised Obama was reelected in 2012. That said, if it doesn't happen then there's no 2016 and President Trump. Divine intervention? Of course, I have to be fair, I didn't vote in 2012 because fuck Romney/Ryan.
Painful for those cheated, but if we're being hones everyone in 2012 was on the same team anyway ... Big government, Big bureaucracy, and War.
Talk about a losing proposition. If we win we get Romney, if we lose we get Obama. A lame duck Obama with a republican congress was probably better than Romney. Cheating or not there was no winning that election.
Bob Dole was put up against Clinton to lose. He was a long time Republican a war hero and the party thought it would be nice to give him the nomination. He had no chance of winning. He wasn't demented like Biden, but too old to be president.
It used to be that was more or less the pattern, they'd just alternate presidency every 8 years and purposely nominate someone terrible to run against the incumbent, except for guys like Carter who really sucked (or Reagan was just supposed to lose and like Trump, surprise!). During Obama the Dems decided they didn't want to play that game anymore.
I'm not sure Clinton was supposed to win in 1992. All of the Dems were very week that year. The only reason Clinton won was because Ross Perrott came out of no where and took votes away from Bush.
How? We didn’t have any real choices. Our last truly elected president was Reagan, but he screwed up by letting himself be pressured into selecting Bush as his VP.
After Reagan, every president has been selected until Trump.
All I remember from that campaign is it seemed like Obama did not want to win. He seemed exhausted and disenfranchised. I was surprised he won, so was he I think. Probably thought the fraud would come to light.
I remember Obama's debates were not as good as Romney's, that definitely showed on election day where Romney got a great turnout except the same thing happened, towards midnight Obama was slowly taking leads. Dominion?
Even as an Englishman, I knew something was up. The general sentiment towards Obama by 2012 was increasingly negative to the point it was beginning to be frequently memed (Thanks Obama), and yet he ran away with the re-eelection?
I actually KNOW that he did. After the election I was taken aback by the difference between the Romney rallies and the Obama rallies, not nearly as dramatic as this time but noticeable. I figured that I would poke around a bit and see what I could find. What I found was that precincts in Philadelphia were reporting voter turnout of 150%+, not even Saddam Hussain got that kind of turnout.
I had no idea of what to do with that information. Romney had already conceded and everything was moving on. I just didn’t know what to do with that. 😔
You are correct. He used Hammer and Scorecard. Mitt Cuckney got double-screwed because he paid for for "election insurance" through intermediaries that were actually running the scam for Obama/CIA/Brennan. Immediately after the election in November 2012, Mitt Romney made a big investment in voting machines that may actually be tied to Dominion/Smartmatic/Sequoia. I didn't have time to pull that thread.
But yeah, Obama has been shadow emperor/crime lord since 2016 and Cuckney dirty as hell. Both are probably going to prison. Obama may get executed for treason, no joke!
Good. I'm glad that Obama won in 2012 and Mittens didn't become President.
If those events never fell into place, we would never have Trump
It took a Carter to get us Regan, it took Obama to get us Trump.
Unless your President is a patriot.
Headlines without election fraud and media collusion
No. Bc for as bad as Mittens is/was/would have been; he would still have been forced by a Republican Senate, to not put the open Marxists/Lefties on the Supreme Court. The Establishment Justices and Judges would have been in instead of Obama Judges/Justices. [Spez And as others have noted, Mittens likely wouldn't have even been the nominee either, bc honest primaries too.]
Gotta speed this up young pollywogs, or else don't say, like years ago on TDspezdit I didn't give plenty of warning on where we are now, and what's coming.
Time-travelling, autist, nimble-navigator, VSG, Redpilled solutions to all this stuff,
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EhtERu/for-everyone-who-wants-djtpence-/
LONG LIVE OUR REPUBLIC!! -Quaker Pede
Mittens is a different side of the same coin. The judges he would have appointed would be no different than the activist judges (just less apparent in their motive). The establishment RINO types are the same ones refusing to fight against this election fraud. Even a Bush appointed judge threw out the Trump lawsuit in a state.
And we never would have got Trump, which means we would still be in an environment of choosing RINOs vs Democrats, with the same end goal (Great Reset).
Yup. Bush or Barry. only the color js different, they are the same.
The judges would have been different. They are the ones with multi-generational ties to the Swamp/DC; which the Establishment supports fully. DJT still himself, has to pick at least half of his judges from this same batch, and only gets a non-Establishment pick like every other time. It's too much political capital to do otherwise. And these Republican swamp judges are WAY better than leftie judges & justices.
It's pretty simple, to play the alternate time-line of not having Lefties/Marxists cheat elections... depending on how far back you want to go.
We could go back to Marxist-Anarchist killing President McKinley, making the way for "progressive TR". Or to T. Roosevelt and the Bull Moose Party to get W.Wilson to get The FED & the US into WW1. Or to FDR particularly his 1940 3rd term election to get the US into WW2.
Or to 1960 where Nixon would have won over JFK (thus no LBJ, no Vietnam, no 1965 nonsense Immigration Bill, and tons of other things; no opening up to Commie China)
Then in 1968 maybe Goldwater or in 1972-1980 R.Reagon would have won, no leftie violence in the streets, commies fully cleaned out of colleges/hollywood/media stopping their Long March through the institutitons, no massive debts required, paid for space program with no breaks/no brakes, maybe even done a few things like repealed income tax, The Draft, & The FED.
Then likely in 1980 perhaps a younger Dole/Perot or Dole/Paul term. Then could have even had someone like a younger DJT, to keep MAGA going for another 8 years. Etc.
...
[GEOPOLITICAL Redpill, you can't unsee once you see it.] The goal (by the Dems/globalists/marxists/interventionists) as an example, who got the US into Vietnam, was to deplete the US, and our resources, grind up American Patriots & local (Vietnamese) Patriots & monarchy; thus the marxists here in the US and in Vietnam could rise with less competition to power.
Same thing in other countries too, like China in the '40s; WW1, WW2, Post 9/11 etc. All over the map for 120 years now (including Russia 1917, etc.). Most of the entire 20th Century warfare and conlfict, and still today in 2020, is this.
Marxists start crap, escalation, countries fighting over some other pretense with the help of Marxists in power in those countries controlling policy/news/etc. And when a country or monarchy is weakened from war, the other marxists strike either overtly, or Long March through the Institutions; and the map grows in marxism both internationally and WITHIN countries.
Media is but one institution which has fallen to the Long March through the Institutions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_long_march_through_the_institutions
Faux news being the last of the big 4 networks, to sink under the waterline.
The marxists take over an insitutiton, and use it; and when it no longer serves their purposes, they burn it to the ground. Ceding institutions to the commies is not a winning strategy, nor is speeding an institutions' destruction a real solution. Calling Marxism out for what it is, don't let them hide behind dozens of labels.
Things incoming like the CRT BAN, 1776-Commission, and many other things will turn the tide; but it's going to take a lot of work by a lot of people to rebuild the institutions. Everything from: Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Methodist & Catholic Churches, Professional Sports, Hollywood, Media, Schools/Colleges/Universities, PTAs, Silicon Valley, gov agencies, etc.
So marxists are yet again, trying to raise the water temperature to "boil"; which is why the marxists have some of their skirmishers doing point-blank assassinations in front of video cameras. And if they get their way, this wont be peaceably resolved, which will allow the marxists to grow, yet again, internationally between countries, and within countries.
We really need to speed up, to head them off where it matters most, hence my constant spam. As link to my post in my comment above.
HE COULDN'T BEAT RON PAUL
HE USED SMARTMATIC TWICE: ONCE ADS SCRIPTED WINNER ONCE AS SCRIPTED LOSER.
Was designed to take our minds off how Ron Paul got cheated BEFORE either Trump or Bernie!!
Eh, maybe. But what's to stop him from putting a compromised RINO justice like John Roberts?
You are right.
Even without Trump, Romney would've been worse than Obama.
RON PAUL BEAT HIM SOUNDLY IN PRIMARIES
He knew because Romney sucked.
I'm glad I never voted for that bitch.
.... His balls
Romney used dominion/SMARTMATIC against Ron Paul
Election fraud was in play for sure, but don't forget that Romney basically threw the second and third debates after winning the first and was an uninspiring RINO. Romney is a globalist, a member of the Cabal, and was probably just a placeholder, a fake opponent to give the illusion of a real election.
THIS!!!
So obvious now! That's why we know Trump won 2020.
Do not let another steal happen, America.
WE HAVE ONLY BEGUN TO FIGHT
Joe did say that they had done it for the Obama/Biden administration, going on to talk about the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in US history.
Yeah, I believe so. I was extremely surprised Obama was reelected in 2012. That said, if it doesn't happen then there's no 2016 and President Trump. Divine intervention? Of course, I have to be fair, I didn't vote in 2012 because fuck Romney/Ryan.
Painful for those cheated, but if we're being hones everyone in 2012 was on the same team anyway ... Big government, Big bureaucracy, and War.
Talk about a losing proposition. If we win we get Romney, if we lose we get Obama. A lame duck Obama with a republican congress was probably better than Romney. Cheating or not there was no winning that election.
And before that McCain. Then Bush. I can honestly say I know nothing about Bob Dole. But before that HW. Shit shit shit candidates.
Bob Dole was put up against Clinton to lose. He was a long time Republican a war hero and the party thought it would be nice to give him the nomination. He had no chance of winning. He wasn't demented like Biden, but too old to be president.
It used to be that was more or less the pattern, they'd just alternate presidency every 8 years and purposely nominate someone terrible to run against the incumbent, except for guys like Carter who really sucked (or Reagan was just supposed to lose and like Trump, surprise!). During Obama the Dems decided they didn't want to play that game anymore.
I'm not sure Clinton was supposed to win in 1992. All of the Dems were very week that year. The only reason Clinton won was because Ross Perrott came out of no where and took votes away from Bush.
I'm sure there was substantial fraud in 2008 as well even if he didn't need it.
How? We didn’t have any real choices. Our last truly elected president was Reagan, but he screwed up by letting himself be pressured into selecting Bush as his VP.
After Reagan, every president has been selected until Trump.
Reagan allowed Amnesty.
All I remember from that campaign is it seemed like Obama did not want to win. He seemed exhausted and disenfranchised. I was surprised he won, so was he I think. Probably thought the fraud would come to light.
I always wonder what went on in VA in 2014, Dave Brat beat Eric Cantor, Eric Cantor Boehner's successor - who wanted him out of the way - Ryan?
2014 was the same year Hillary's pal McAuliffe was supposedly elected Governor.
I wonder what we could learn if we looked into those elections
I remember Obama's debates were not as good as Romney's, that definitely showed on election day where Romney got a great turnout except the same thing happened, towards midnight Obama was slowly taking leads. Dominion?
Even as an Englishman, I knew something was up. The general sentiment towards Obama by 2012 was increasingly negative to the point it was beginning to be frequently memed (Thanks Obama), and yet he ran away with the re-eelection?
I actually KNOW that he did. After the election I was taken aback by the difference between the Romney rallies and the Obama rallies, not nearly as dramatic as this time but noticeable. I figured that I would poke around a bit and see what I could find. What I found was that precincts in Philadelphia were reporting voter turnout of 150%+, not even Saddam Hussain got that kind of turnout.
I had no idea of what to do with that information. Romney had already conceded and everything was moving on. I just didn’t know what to do with that. 😔
You are correct. He used Hammer and Scorecard. Mitt Cuckney got double-screwed because he paid for for "election insurance" through intermediaries that were actually running the scam for Obama/CIA/Brennan. Immediately after the election in November 2012, Mitt Romney made a big investment in voting machines that may actually be tied to Dominion/Smartmatic/Sequoia. I didn't have time to pull that thread.
But yeah, Obama has been shadow emperor/crime lord since 2016 and Cuckney dirty as hell. Both are probably going to prison. Obama may get executed for treason, no joke!
Romney couldn't beat Ron Paul. He used software that scripted him a winner when he lost
He used software that scripted Obama the winner when he may have won in that rigged popularity contest
Was all rigged from very beginnibg
WE COULD HAVE HAD PRESIDENT RON PAUL!!!
RON PAUL WON 2012!!!
I'm from Utah and knew Romney was a crooked & corrupt. Utah had more Ron Paul supporters than RINOs.
Maybe. But everyone hates Mitt Romney
Is it because he's black? That's it, right? You're saying a black man stole the election, because he's black.
KEK. I can't keep it up.
Ron Paul has the presidency stolen from him in 2012. My first red pill.
No.. romney was just a pussy
Honestly, Mitt was a cuck too. I'm sure his time as president would of been similar.. seeing as deep state runs the show.
Last line though: If voter fraud becomes acceptable, then maybe Donald Trump is right: it's time for a revolution.
He fucking KNEW
Why do I care about 2012. Let's focus on now.
Duh