1057
Comments (51)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
540k-Again 7 points ago +7 / -0

No. Bc for as bad as Mittens is/was/would have been; he would still have been forced by a Republican Senate, to not put the open Marxists/Lefties on the Supreme Court. The Establishment Justices and Judges would have been in instead of Obama Judges/Justices. [Spez And as others have noted, Mittens likely wouldn't have even been the nominee either, bc honest primaries too.]

Gotta speed this up young pollywogs, or else don't say, like years ago on TDspezdit I didn't give plenty of warning on where we are now, and what's coming.

Time-travelling, autist, nimble-navigator, VSG, Redpilled solutions to all this stuff,

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EhtERu/for-everyone-who-wants-djtpence-/

LONG LIVE OUR REPUBLIC!! -Quaker Pede

8
MAGA1775 8 points ago +8 / -0

Mittens is a different side of the same coin. The judges he would have appointed would be no different than the activist judges (just less apparent in their motive). The establishment RINO types are the same ones refusing to fight against this election fraud. Even a Bush appointed judge threw out the Trump lawsuit in a state.

And we never would have got Trump, which means we would still be in an environment of choosing RINOs vs Democrats, with the same end goal (Great Reset).

2
IndianMemewarVet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup. Bush or Barry. only the color js different, they are the same.

1
540k-Again 1 point ago +1 / -0

The judges would have been different. They are the ones with multi-generational ties to the Swamp/DC; which the Establishment supports fully. DJT still himself, has to pick at least half of his judges from this same batch, and only gets a non-Establishment pick like every other time. It's too much political capital to do otherwise. And these Republican swamp judges are WAY better than leftie judges & justices.

It's pretty simple, to play the alternate time-line of not having Lefties/Marxists cheat elections... depending on how far back you want to go.

We could go back to Marxist-Anarchist killing President McKinley, making the way for "progressive TR". Or to T. Roosevelt and the Bull Moose Party to get W.Wilson to get The FED & the US into WW1. Or to FDR particularly his 1940 3rd term election to get the US into WW2.

Or to 1960 where Nixon would have won over JFK (thus no LBJ, no Vietnam, no 1965 nonsense Immigration Bill, and tons of other things; no opening up to Commie China)

Then in 1968 maybe Goldwater or in 1972-1980 R.Reagon would have won, no leftie violence in the streets, commies fully cleaned out of colleges/hollywood/media stopping their Long March through the institutitons, no massive debts required, paid for space program with no breaks/no brakes, maybe even done a few things like repealed income tax, The Draft, & The FED.

Then likely in 1980 perhaps a younger Dole/Perot or Dole/Paul term. Then could have even had someone like a younger DJT, to keep MAGA going for another 8 years. Etc.

...

[GEOPOLITICAL Redpill, you can't unsee once you see it.] The goal (by the Dems/globalists/marxists/interventionists) as an example, who got the US into Vietnam, was to deplete the US, and our resources, grind up American Patriots & local (Vietnamese) Patriots & monarchy; thus the marxists here in the US and in Vietnam could rise with less competition to power.

Same thing in other countries too, like China in the '40s; WW1, WW2, Post 9/11 etc. All over the map for 120 years now (including Russia 1917, etc.). Most of the entire 20th Century warfare and conlfict, and still today in 2020, is this.

Marxists start crap, escalation, countries fighting over some other pretense with the help of Marxists in power in those countries controlling policy/news/etc. And when a country or monarchy is weakened from war, the other marxists strike either overtly, or Long March through the Institutions; and the map grows in marxism both internationally and WITHIN countries.

Media is but one institution which has fallen to the Long March through the Institutions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_long_march_through_the_institutions

Faux news being the last of the big 4 networks, to sink under the waterline.

The marxists take over an insitutiton, and use it; and when it no longer serves their purposes, they burn it to the ground. Ceding institutions to the commies is not a winning strategy, nor is speeding an institutions' destruction a real solution. Calling Marxism out for what it is, don't let them hide behind dozens of labels.

Things incoming like the CRT BAN, 1776-Commission, and many other things will turn the tide; but it's going to take a lot of work by a lot of people to rebuild the institutions. Everything from: Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Methodist & Catholic Churches, Professional Sports, Hollywood, Media, Schools/Colleges/Universities, PTAs, Silicon Valley, gov agencies, etc.

So marxists are yet again, trying to raise the water temperature to "boil"; which is why the marxists have some of their skirmishers doing point-blank assassinations in front of video cameras. And if they get their way, this wont be peaceably resolved, which will allow the marxists to grow, yet again, internationally between countries, and within countries.

We really need to speed up, to head them off where it matters most, hence my constant spam. As link to my post in my comment above.

2
Independenceforever 2 points ago +2 / -0

HE COULDN'T BEAT RON PAUL

HE USED SMARTMATIC TWICE: ONCE ADS SCRIPTED WINNER ONCE AS SCRIPTED LOSER.

Was designed to take our minds off how Ron Paul got cheated BEFORE either Trump or Bernie!!

2
Berkeley 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eh, maybe. But what's to stop him from putting a compromised RINO justice like John Roberts?