1720
posted ago by joeblow2020 +1720 / -0

So I'm looking at this file, which was one of the first posted at 7:16 PM EST on 11/3. Biden is up exactly 421-233 in 203 out of 230 precincts in Chester County. What's up with that??? I'm sure it's just another one of those funny little coinkydinks that always favor Democrats.

So I'm looking at [this file](https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/precincts/PAGeneralConcatenator-2020-11-04T02:16:40.084Z.json), which was one of the first posted at 7:16 PM EST on 11/3. Biden is up exactly 421-233 in 203 out of 230 precincts in Chester County. What's up with that??? I'm sure it's just another one of those funny little coinkydinks that always favor Democrats.
Comments (72)
sorted by:
58
merf 58 points ago +58 / -0

Wow good eye, and it is copied for each of the third party candidates also.

Search for this text:

{"bidenj":421,"trumpd":233,"jorgensenj":17,"other":4}

Also looks like precinct 860 ran whatever gave Biden that proportion twice?

{"locality_name":"Chester","precinct_id":"860 WEST CHESTER 7","is_reporting":true,"is_complete":null,"results":{"bidenj":842,"trumpd":466,"jorgensenj":34,"other":8}

48
errydaktal 48 points ago +48 / -0

I mean this is algorithmic and perfect factor data completely leading up to the final tally and anyone looking at that and thinking they're real votes is a fucking disgrace. It gets to the point where they might as well not have counted any votes and entered in random numbers, that's how meaningless the original votes have become. It could easily be 40m votes out

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
20
Tecumseh_S64 20 points ago +20 / -0

The suspicion a lot of us have been having now is urban turnout has been trash for years now, and something like this is how they've been maintaining their positions.

11
errydaktal 11 points ago +11 / -0

Wasn't it like 15% in some districts

6
Tecumseh_S64 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes, some lower.

14
fskfsk 14 points ago +14 / -0

All I fear will come out of this is, 4 years from now, they'll be able to make more convincing fake data. I mean this is real amateur job, I can't believe they couldn't do better.

5
jealousminarchist 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep. First order of business is paper ballots, in-person, voting day only (make it a holiday).

Everything else pales in importance compared to that.

3
FuckYouAsWell 3 points ago +3 / -0

Everything else pales in importance compared to that.

I beg your pardon. Everything you said is useless without voter id.

3
jealousminarchist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes voter ID is presumed along with the other changes.

13
Shakakka99 13 points ago +13 / -0

Whoever the FUCK thought it was a good idea to take individual votes and boil them down to convoluted fractions and decimal places was a complete fuckwit.

OR... it was done this way to make things easy to manipulate (and confuse 99.9% of the public).

I don't need to tell you which one my money's on.

2
SheikFromMozambake 2 points ago +2 / -0

They didn't chop up INDIVIDUAL votes. It appears that they assigned some fraction of the TOTAL number of votes over some period of time to a specific candidate. It would be like instructing the machine to give Biden some fixed percentage, say 73%, of the vote from now until it receives a different instruction.

2
SheikFromMozambake 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only reason the machines count the votes is so they know what the total should be. It's election theater.

24
i5ogjdfioj934 24 points ago +24 / -0

Also looks like precinct 860 ran whatever gave Biden that proportion twice?

Likely accidentally entered/saved the data twice and it duplicated in their system.

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU LET ETHEL AND GLADYS RUN THE VOTE RIGGING SOFTWARE, RETARDS.

12
joeblow2020 [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

Whoa! Good catch!

40
errydaktal 40 points ago +40 / -0

Didn't Sidney say that democrats started off with more votes I.e. not at 0

26
ItsOKtoVoteTrump 26 points ago +26 / -0

yea she said she thinks they all had a 35k vote head start

40
joeblow2020 [S] 40 points ago +40 / -0

I bet you're right! A 188 vote lead in 203 precincts = 38,164

17
KickingPugilist 17 points ago +17 / -0

Wow, yeah it adds up! I wish I knew all that Powell knows!

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
2
SarahCartersPuppies 2 points ago +2 / -0

WHERE IS SHE GETTING THIS NUMBER FROM?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
10
merf 10 points ago +10 / -0

What is 30330?

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
5
MadMaxUSMC 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ya you “go” to it according to Biden

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
5
HazelHen 5 points ago +5 / -0

Another “coincidence”

4
Seeker_of_Firecrotch 4 points ago +4 / -0

C’mon Man!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
SarahCartersPuppies 3 points ago +3 / -0

YOU KNOW THE THING...CMON MAN!

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
7
KickingPugilist 7 points ago +7 / -0

They're very blatant with shoving shit like that in our faces

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
TwoStar 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've seen you asked that question at least four times.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Not_reddit_username 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably a service. I looked them up.

8
deleted 8 points ago +10 / -2
5
SarahCartersPuppies 5 points ago +5 / -0

THATS WHAT SHE SAID.

7
Insanejub 7 points ago +7 / -0

So I decided to take another look at Chester Country, PA after I saw this post.
...I don't know if this has been reported or posted about before, but I think I found something potentially very big. So…. While focusing on Chester county specifically, I looked through the December 2019 Country Voter Registration data by congressional districts, the 2016 primary and general election results, the current 2020 primary general elections results, and the Current Voter Registration Stats by Congressional Districts

HERE ARE THE TWO MAIN TAKE-AWAYS: NUKE NUMBER 1 = If you look at 2020 presidential primary election results versus the presidential general election results you’ll see THREE things:

  1. THE NUMBER OF DEMOCRAT VOTES INCREASED 18.212%,
  2. THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN VOTES DECREASED 15.406%,
  3. THE NUMBER OF LIBERTARIAN VOTES DECREASED BY 1,834.462%

NUKE NUMBER 2 = In Chester County, if you look at total number of registered voters for each party and then compare those numbers with the 2020 presidential PRIMARY election turnout numbers by party as well as the 2020 presidential general elections turnout numbers by party, you’ll see this…

  1. 91.35% of all registered 3rd PARTY VOTERS turned out and voted in their respective 3rd PARTY primary elections.
  2. 95.51% of all registered REPUBLICANS turned out and voted in the REPUBLICAN primary election for TRUMP.
  3. 94.82% of all registered DEMOCRATS turned out and voted in the DEMOCRAT primary election. Now, the craziest part of all this is when you look at the number of registered voters from each party, with the number of people who voted for each party’s candidate in the general election. compared with the number of total registered voters in each party.
  4. 3rd Party candidates received 4.98% of the 3rd party registered voters in the general election. So, 3rd party voters went from 91.35% turnout in their primaries to only 4.98% for their candidates in the general election.
    That’s a DECREASE of 18343.462%.
  5. Trump received 82.76% of the republican registered voters in the general election. So, republican voters went from 95.51% turnout during the primaries to 82.76% for Trump in the general election.
    That’s a DECREASE of 17.24%.
  6. Biden ODDLY ENOUGH received 115.94% of the number of registered democrat voters in the general election. Sooooo, apparently democrat voters somehow went from 94.82% turnout during the primaries to 115.94% in the general election. (this doesn’t even include the percent of dems who even voted for Biden in the primaries). That would be an INCREASE of 15.94%, which would mean that there was a 17-point swing of registered republicans that voted for Trump in the primay but then voted for Biden in the general, AND virtually every registered 3rd party voter that voted in the 3rd party primaries then voting for Biden too! Dems are the most blatant election cheaters in history!

P.S. There is also some interesting information regarding Chester County and some of the changes that occurred there on both December 2nd, 2017 and on November 6th, 2018.

  • On 12/2/2017 - PA Congressional District #1 adopted the WebAPI Voter Registration Service. They were the first district to publicly do so in PA. (Note: At that time Chester County was in Commonwealth District #1)
  • On 11/5/2018 - PA Supreme Court ruled current districting was unconstitutional and they redrew the congressional districts, which favored the Democrats, and this made Chester County to now be part of the Commonwealth D6, instead of D1. A democrat representative then won that seat after the redistricting.
7
OMBOMB 7 points ago +7 / -0

PA will regret they ever had these numbers accessible

6
TrumpsThirdLeg 6 points ago +7 / -1

hi u/joeblow2020, I'd like to place this finding in my PA fuckery megathread if you don't mind. I'm collecting all analysis, stats, and data pertaining to PA in 2020. You can look at the thread here:

Ground Zero: PA Fuckery Megathread

3
joeblow2020 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Awesome! Here's some free bonus fuckery: A list of PA precincts where the combined third party vote was the same or higher than Trump. https://pastebin.com/dLbWWFhv

2
TrumpsThirdLeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Excellent, thank you. Do you happen to know the source of the data?

Thanks again!

3
joeblow2020 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, This one is the source for those numbers (from 11/9, I'll look and see if anything has changed since then, but probably not) : https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/precincts/PAGeneralConcatenator-2020-11-09T23:44:13.151Z.json

4
DonewithMirrors 4 points ago +4 / -0

Looped link: https://thedonald.win/p/11QS2vdrgR/wow-sidney-powell-just-stated-in/c/

WOW! Sidney Powell just stated in ARIZONA 35k ballots were added to every Democratic candidate! https://youtu.be/KpT2Rz4rTWM

3
Darius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sticky this!!

3
DArtist51 3 points ago +3 / -0

I love pedes who can wade through this kind of data without becoming completely overwhelmed. Thanks, pede! You are helping us MAGA!

3
not_a_shill 3 points ago +3 / -0

you gotta start the algorithim with some initial numbers.

3
RunDNC 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is a similiar chart floating around here today for Wayne, Michigan with Biden leading over trump with the same exact lead with the same exact vote counts at the same time in separate precincts.

3
ikuyas 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a single greatest evidence of the voting machine fraud you found(?) or you are in the intelligence community and pretend that you just found it.

3
MAGASquatch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Priming the algorithm.

3
idkfa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Indeed, what are the chances that out of 233 precincts 203 would have:

  1. an identical number of votes (675), and
  2. an identical split between candidates (421 Biden, 233 Trump, 17 Jorgensen, 4 other)?
    https://i.maga.host/yqNvW3y.png

Cmon man!

2
MyDogCompletesMe 2 points ago +2 / -0

My guess is that they were pooling all the ballots for several precincts instead of counting the precincts individually. They let the algorithm distribute the votes and the very first distribution amounted to 421Biden-233Trump. Note that this would indicate a disbursement of exactly 300 real ballot count to each of the precincts.

The ratio for Biden was 1.403 and the ratio for Trump was 0.776. So when they counted the first 300 votes for each candidate, multiplied by the number of precincts (if it was 5 precincts then 1500 votes for each candidate) 421 was sent out for Biden to each of the 5 precincts and 233 was sent out for Trump.

I imagine this cycle was repeated, and after the initial "seeds", the amounts were weighted for precinct size.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
joeblow2020 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

I made a previous post about the data files. There are links to download the raw files and also a .csv with all of them compiled together. Basically, the links came from archive.org snapshots https://thedonald.win/p/11QRoqVBY0/-halp-datapedes-i-have-nytimes-d/

2
JamesClarker 2 points ago +2 / -0

What time zone is the Edison and NYT data in?

5
joeblow2020 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

The time in the filename is Zulu time, which is 5 hours ahead of EST (Which also means I miscounted and the file is 9 PM and not 7 PM like I originally posted)

3
JamesClarker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok awesome.. thank you. I am from PA and have been looking at the data as well.

Did you tally up the vote and then see how it changes at future time stamps? And then it could be cross referenced with the county data as a whole to confirm if it was incorporated?

5
joeblow2020 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

I haven't looked at individual precincts (yet), but overall in Chester County, the numbers seem to just keep going up, so these first numbers would seem to me to be included in the county total. Interestingly, Biden only gained something like 2800 votes up until midnight, and Trump gained something like 44k votes, and actually took the lead! But then, Chester County doesn't seem to have any further data in the files I'm looking at, as if they didn't report data to this after midnight on election night. But according to the current totals, Biden has gained about 76,000 votes since this chart, while Trump only gained about 13,700. Did the Chester County votes counted since midnight on election night really go 85% for Biden? Seems unlike to me.

2
JamesClarker 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do you get other time stamps?

3
joeblow2020 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I made a previous post about the data files. There are links to download the raw files and also a .csv with all of them compiled together. Basically, the links came from archive.org snapshots https://thedonald.win/p/11QRoqVBY0/-halp-datapedes-i-have-nytimes-d/

1
JamesClarker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks! I wish it was stickied somewhere; I can't get through search feature to work.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
joeblow2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Biden vote did decrease in those (and other) precincts. At first glance, it made me think that those initial numbers were bogus, but I noticed something else. If you look at the total vote in Chester across time, it stayed nearly the same for Biden. Biden only gained something like 2800 votes up until midnight, and Trump gained something like 44k votes, and actually took the lead! But then, Chester County doesn't seem to have any further data in the files I'm looking at, as if they didn't report data to this after midnight on election night. But according to the current totals, Biden has gained about 76,000 votes since this chart, while Trump only gained about 13,700. Did the Chester County votes counted since midnight on election night really go 85% for Biden? Seems unlike to me. (Also, I've decided that I shouldn't be considering anything in these numbers "bogus"...it's what was reported, and if anything looks off, it needs to be brought to light.) Check out this list of precincts where combined third party candidates got more votes than Trump. 330-1, with third party getting 2? C'mon!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0