Cancel culture is actively trying to destroy a person or a business. How I choose to spend my time and money (in this case, not on Tucker or BRCC) is called capitalism.
Once again, there's a big difference between cancel culture and letting your money do the talking. Getting BRCC to disavow Kyle to avoid fallout was cancel culture at work. People expressing their displeasure with BRCC's decision by not giving them any more money, is not.
Cancel culture is actively trying to destroy a person or a business. How I choose to spend my time and money (in this case, not on Tucker or BRCC) is called capitalism.
So there's no mob trying to cancel Tucker or BRCC right now? You're going to stick with that?
Once again, there's a big difference between cancel culture and letting your money do the talking. Getting BRCC to disavow Kyle to avoid fallout was cancel culture at work. People expressing their displeasure with BRCC's decision by not giving them any more money, is not.
BRCC never disavowed the Rittenhouse case. Words have meaning.
You're right, they DO have meaning. Here's a similar statement about the non-sponsorship of Kyle, with a VERY important difference:
"We don’t sponsor or have a relationship with Kyle either.
But if he wants a free bag of coffee or T-shirt...he can have one.
He is one of the few folks who actually stood up to domestic terrorism and we hope to see the courts find him innocent."
https://twitter.com/smcroasters/status/1330460969752027137