Once again, there's a big difference between cancel culture and letting your money do the talking. Getting BRCC to disavow Kyle to avoid fallout was cancel culture at work. People expressing their displeasure with BRCC's decision by not giving them any more money, is not.
I fell for nothing. BRCC could have easily said that while they don't sponsor Kyle, they believe in the 2nd Amendment and one's right to self-defense. Yet they didn't. Words have meaning.
Once again, there's a big difference between cancel culture and letting your money do the talking. Getting BRCC to disavow Kyle to avoid fallout was cancel culture at work. People expressing their displeasure with BRCC's decision by not giving them any more money, is not.
BRCC never disavowed the Rittenhouse case. Words have meaning.
You're right, they DO have meaning. Here's a similar statement about the non-sponsorship of Kyle, with a VERY important difference:
"We don’t sponsor or have a relationship with Kyle either.
But if he wants a free bag of coffee or T-shirt...he can have one.
He is one of the few folks who actually stood up to domestic terrorism and we hope to see the courts find him innocent."
https://twitter.com/smcroasters/status/1330460969752027137
You fell for their much smaller competitor's PR stunt lol
I fell for nothing. BRCC could have easily said that while they don't sponsor Kyle, they believe in the 2nd Amendment and one's right to self-defense. Yet they didn't. Words have meaning.