582 So Sidney Powell isn't on Trumps team but Trump tweeted this so im confused now. Did they drop her? (media.patriots.win) posted 144 days ago by KilluminatiAJ 144 days ago by KilluminatiAJ +583 / -1 73 comments share 73 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (73) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 19 ▼ – FireannDireach 19 points 144 days ago +20 / -1 She can't work as a military lawyer, as she's not in the military, nor does she specialize in military justice. permalink save report block reply ▲ -6 ▼ – Fenuuk -6 points 144 days ago +4 / -10 but she can argue is needs to be a military case and assist. permalink save report block reply ▲ 15 ▼ – FireannDireach 15 points 144 days ago +16 / -1 That's not how any of it works. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -5 ▼ – Fenuuk -5 points 144 days ago +4 / -9 client is, former NSA chief General Flynn permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 10 ▼ – FireannDireach 10 points 144 days ago +11 / -1 Oh, ffs. I'm not even going to bother. Go be stubborn at someone else. You're exhausting. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -7 ▼ – Fenuuk -7 points 144 days ago +1 / -8 pretty sure it dose and has done for years permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – FireannDireach 3 points 144 days ago +6 / -3 Pretty sure what "dose"? The word is "does". And, sedition charges would come from the DOJ in a Federal court, as nobody involved is in the military. This is not a Federal case - yet. Nobody is in the military. Sidney is not an attorney of record on any of this and will not be appearing as a lawyer in any of these cases. A state court case on election procedures cannot be transformed to 'sedition" charges just because someone asks. None of it works the way you think it DOES, stop being stubborn and just admit you're wrong. permalink parent save report block reply
She can't work as a military lawyer, as she's not in the military, nor does she specialize in military justice.
but she can argue is needs to be a military case and assist.
That's not how any of it works.
client is, former NSA chief General Flynn
Oh, ffs. I'm not even going to bother. Go be stubborn at someone else. You're exhausting.
pretty sure it dose and has done for years
Pretty sure what "dose"? The word is "does". And, sedition charges would come from the DOJ in a Federal court, as nobody involved is in the military.
This is not a Federal case - yet.
Nobody is in the military.
Sidney is not an attorney of record on any of this and will not be appearing as a lawyer in any of these cases.
A state court case on election procedures cannot be transformed to 'sedition" charges just because someone asks.
None of it works the way you think it DOES, stop being stubborn and just admit you're wrong.