582
Comments (73)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-6
Fenuuk -6 points ago +4 / -10

but she can argue is needs to be a military case and assist.

15
FireannDireach 15 points ago +16 / -1

That's not how any of it works.

-5
Fenuuk -5 points ago +4 / -9

client is, former NSA chief General Flynn

10
FireannDireach 10 points ago +11 / -1

Oh, ffs. I'm not even going to bother. Go be stubborn at someone else. You're exhausting.

3
RANDOR0423 3 points ago +6 / -3

I don't think you understand. She represents someone who used to be military. So therefore she's a military lawyer. /s

1
Dudemanfoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thought I was on the 4 chinese hacker guys website for a sec there... but nobody called the other one a faggot so can't be...

-7
Fenuuk -7 points ago +1 / -8

pretty sure it dose and has done for years

3
FireannDireach 3 points ago +6 / -3

Pretty sure what "dose"? The word is "does". And, sedition charges would come from the DOJ in a Federal court, as nobody involved is in the military.

This is not a Federal case - yet.

Nobody is in the military.

Sidney is not an attorney of record on any of this and will not be appearing as a lawyer in any of these cases.

A state court case on election procedures cannot be transformed to 'sedition" charges just because someone asks.

None of it works the way you think it DOES, stop being stubborn and just admit you're wrong.

-1
literallyhitler -1 points ago +1 / -2

lol why are you tripping over a typo

-2
Fenuuk -2 points ago +2 / -4

i might be wrong

-5
Fenuuk -5 points ago +1 / -6

cool story bro