582 So Sidney Powell isn't on Trumps team but Trump tweeted this so im confused now. Did they drop her? (media.patriots.win) posted 144 days ago by KilluminatiAJ 144 days ago by KilluminatiAJ +583 / -1 73 comments share 73 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (73) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 15 ▼ – FireannDireach 15 points 144 days ago +16 / -1 That's not how any of it works. permalink save report block reply ▲ -5 ▼ – Fenuuk -5 points 144 days ago +4 / -9 client is, former NSA chief General Flynn permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 10 ▼ – FireannDireach 10 points 144 days ago +11 / -1 Oh, ffs. I'm not even going to bother. Go be stubborn at someone else. You're exhausting. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – RANDOR0423 3 points 144 days ago +6 / -3 I don't think you understand. She represents someone who used to be military. So therefore she's a military lawyer. /s permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Dudemanfoo 1 point 144 days ago +1 / -0 Thought I was on the 4 chinese hacker guys website for a sec there... but nobody called the other one a faggot so can't be... permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -7 ▼ – Fenuuk -7 points 144 days ago +1 / -8 pretty sure it dose and has done for years permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – FireannDireach 3 points 144 days ago +6 / -3 Pretty sure what "dose"? The word is "does". And, sedition charges would come from the DOJ in a Federal court, as nobody involved is in the military. This is not a Federal case - yet. Nobody is in the military. Sidney is not an attorney of record on any of this and will not be appearing as a lawyer in any of these cases. A state court case on election procedures cannot be transformed to 'sedition" charges just because someone asks. None of it works the way you think it DOES, stop being stubborn and just admit you're wrong. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -1 ▼ – literallyhitler -1 points 144 days ago +1 / -2 lol why are you tripping over a typo permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -2 ▼ – Fenuuk -2 points 144 days ago +2 / -4 i might be wrong permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 144 days ago +4 / -1 ▲ -5 ▼ – Fenuuk -5 points 144 days ago +1 / -6 cool story bro permalink parent save report block reply
That's not how any of it works.
client is, former NSA chief General Flynn
Oh, ffs. I'm not even going to bother. Go be stubborn at someone else. You're exhausting.
I don't think you understand. She represents someone who used to be military. So therefore she's a military lawyer. /s
Thought I was on the 4 chinese hacker guys website for a sec there... but nobody called the other one a faggot so can't be...
pretty sure it dose and has done for years
Pretty sure what "dose"? The word is "does". And, sedition charges would come from the DOJ in a Federal court, as nobody involved is in the military.
This is not a Federal case - yet.
Nobody is in the military.
Sidney is not an attorney of record on any of this and will not be appearing as a lawyer in any of these cases.
A state court case on election procedures cannot be transformed to 'sedition" charges just because someone asks.
None of it works the way you think it DOES, stop being stubborn and just admit you're wrong.
lol why are you tripping over a typo
i might be wrong
cool story bro