582
Comments (73)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-7
Fenuuk -7 points ago +1 / -8

pretty sure it dose and has done for years

3
FireannDireach 3 points ago +6 / -3

Pretty sure what "dose"? The word is "does". And, sedition charges would come from the DOJ in a Federal court, as nobody involved is in the military.

This is not a Federal case - yet.

Nobody is in the military.

Sidney is not an attorney of record on any of this and will not be appearing as a lawyer in any of these cases.

A state court case on election procedures cannot be transformed to 'sedition" charges just because someone asks.

None of it works the way you think it DOES, stop being stubborn and just admit you're wrong.

-1
literallyhitler -1 points ago +1 / -2

lol why are you tripping over a typo

-2
Fenuuk -2 points ago +2 / -4

i might be wrong

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
-1
Fenuuk -1 points ago +1 / -2

1776 if im wrong brother

-5
Fenuuk -5 points ago +1 / -6

cool story bro