There's also the speculation that if treason/ sedition is proven they'd want her for the military tribunal (as she is a military lawyer)
I wanted to put that out here, but I am by no means an expert, it could be disinformation, and I prefer the look of the other paths to victory.
Nonetheless, if that info checks out, the reason for making such a public statements could be strategic distancing.
This way she can't be dismissed from a military case of it comes to that.
Only other reason why they'd have to distance so clearly by making a statement would be that her Georgia claims are a bit too hot. Not an expert on that either though. Any ideas?
There's also the speculation that if treason/ sedition is proven they'd want her for the military tribunal (as she is a military lawyer)
I wanted to put that out here, but I am by no means an expert, it could be disinformation, and I prefer the look of the other paths to victory.
Nonetheless, if that info checks out, the reason for making such a public statements could be strategic distancing. This way she can't be dismissed from a military case of it comes to that.
Only other reason why they'd have to distance so clearly by making a statement would be that her Georgia claims are a bit too hot. Not an expert on that either though. Any ideas?