First off, props to u/joeblown2020 for his post on Chester County earlier today.
That post --> https://thedonald.win/p/11QRtYLIN5/-421233-why-did-203-precincts-in/
So I decided to take another look at Chester Country, PA after I saw his post.
...I don't know if this has been reported or posted about before, but I think I found something potentially very big.
So…. While focusing on Chester county specifically, I looked through the December 2019 Country Voter Registration data by congressional districts, the 2016 primary and general election results, the current 2020 primary general elections results, and the Current Voter Registration Stats by Congressional Districts
HERE ARE THE TWO MAIN TAKE-AWAYS:
NUKE NUMBER 1 = If you look at 2020 presidential primary election results versus the presidential general election results you’ll see THREE things:
-
THE NUMBER OF DEMOCRAT VOTES INCREASED 18.212%,
-
THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN VOTES DECREASED 15.406%,
-
THE NUMBER OF LIBERTARIAN VOTES DECREASED BY 1,834.462%
NUKE NUMBER 2 = In Chester County, if you look at total number of registered voters for each party and then compare those numbers with the 2020 presidential PRIMARY election turnout numbers by party as well as the 2020 presidential general elections turnout numbers by party, you’ll see this…
-
91.35% of all registered 3rd PARTY VOTERS turned out and voted in their respective 3rd PARTY primary elections.
-
95.51% of all registered REPUBLICANS turned out and voted in the REPUBLICAN primary election for TRUMP.
-
94.82% of all registered DEMOCRATS turned out and voted in the DEMOCRAT primary election.
Now, the craziest part of all this is when you look at the number of registered voters from each party, with the number of people who voted for each party’s candidate in the general election. compared with the number of total registered voters in each party.
- 3rd Party candidates received 4.98% of the 3rd party registered voters in the general election. So, 3rd party voters went from 91.35% turnout in their primaries to only 4.98% for their candidates in the general election.
That’s a DECREASE of 18343.462%.
- Trump received 82.76% of the republican registered voters in the general election. So, republican voters went from 95.51% turnout during the primaries to 82.76% for Trump in the general election.
That’s a DECREASE of 17.24%.
- Biden ODDLY ENOUGH received 115.94% of the number of registered democrat voters in the general election. Sooooo, apparently democrat voters somehow went from 94.82% turnout during the primaries to 115.94% in the general election. (this doesn’t even include the percent of dems who even voted for Biden in the primaries).
That would be an INCREASE of 15.94%, which would mean that there was a 17-point swing of registered republicans that voted for Trump in the primay but then voted for Biden in the general, AND virtually every registered 3rd party voter that voted in the 3rd party primaries then voting for Biden too!
Dems are the most blatant election cheaters in history!
P.S. There is also some interesting information regarding Chester County and some of the changes that occurred there on both December 2nd, 2017 and on November 6th, 2018.
-
On 12/2/2017 - PA Congressional District #1 adopted the WebAPI Voter Registration Service. They were the first district to publicly do so in PA. (Note: At that time Chester County was in Commonwealth District #1)
-
On 11/5/2018 - PA Supreme Court ruled current districting was unconstitutional and they redrew the congressional districts, which favored the Democrats, and this made Chester County to now be part of the Commonwealth D6, instead of D1. A democrat representative then won that seat after the redistricting.
All this info was found on the dos.pa.gov website.
We all know they committed massive and systematic fraud, we need hard proof to take them down...don’t get me wrong, this is great work but it’s more an indication of fraud vs proof of fraud.
I get what you are saying but you're are not thinking about this in a legal context. You're thinking about it in the context the MSM want you to think about in.
lIn court, legal teams can PROVE that, BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, there was systemic election/voter fraud occurring with EVIDENCE. Not necessarily PROOF, but EVIDENCE.
Think about like this though...
Would a juror or judge allow a murder to walk because there was not a video of the murderer recording himself prior to the murder, explaining his intent to murder, and then recording himself then murdering the victim? That is 100% proof.
If the murderer was found with the victims blood on his hands and cloths, was able to tell investigators where he ended up burying the body, and there were several credible first hand witnesses who could correctly pick out the murder from a lineup, all giving sworn testimonies that the man being accused of murder, is in fact the murderer.... then what would the juror/judge likely decide?
None of that is "undeniable proof", but it it DAMN GOOD EVIDENCE to be able to find this man guilty of murder beyond any reasonable doubt. That is how court cases are won.
That is coincidentally the SAME level of evidence the legal teams currently have at this point. Not to mention the evidence we've been seeing TDW is just teh evidence we've been able to see. It doesn't even include what the hundreds of affidavits suggest/show, and what other potential evidence those like Sydney Powell, or Rudy may have which is apparently even more damning.
We have WAY MORE than enough evidence at this point to win in the courts. The only thing now is to get it the fuck done!
Civil court is preponderance of evidence not beyond reasonable doubt. Your findings definitely add to preponderance of evidence. Good work
Sorry, you're right.
It is "preponderance of evidence" not "beyond reasonable doubt".
Hopefully this analogy still conveys my point though.
Oh nice. I've only seen clips of this.
Appreciate it!
Yes, but strong indications of fraud point to where more intense investigation should be focused to find actual proof of fraud.
It's a good way to find where voter fraud happened. They cheat in a little Trump so it's not obvious, but don't bother with third parties.
Good work
Interesting.
Love it. Gotta simplify into a shareable 2-3 sentence conclusion for it to spread
Or a graphic
I am not the best at being concise sometimes lol.
I will add all sources tomorrow and try to rewrite into something that's a bit more digestible.
Common sense says fraud. Math says fraud, but we need video evidence, correspondence via phone showing coordination and people turning each other in.
If anyone can rewrite into something that's easily shareable, I am all for it.
Tomorrow I'll try to rewrite this better and/or convey the info in a graphic or chart.
That sounds like a huge percentage turnout for primary elections. Trump was uncontested so it makes no sense he’d get more primary than actual voters.
Exactly.
Obviously Trump did not lose 17% of his base in an election where a historic level of democrats were voting for him as well.
Not to mention, I don't know of a single libertarian who'd EVER vote for Biden/Harris lol.
Great work pede
Great work Watson!
> number of libertarian votes decreased by 1,800.xx%
I think the correct wording would be something like "percentage of registered voters voting decreased by xx%" because decreasing something by itself by 100% would be zero so the way you worded it would mean there's negative votes
Yeah, bad wording on my part.
Good work, but this is the kind of thing that suggests a problem, but you can't say to a judge, "It's not realistic that this happened."
It makes perfect sense to us that the Dems cheated, but it doesn't meet a legal standard of evidence, I'm afraid.
Read my other reply. Also, you are correct.
I am just hoping that presenting this info on TD will help others. Perhaps others out there who are accumulating and organizing more of this information, may find this useful.
I am not 100% sure what this information indicates specifically but others may.
Just trying to help where I can.
Have you seen the thread about the guy who spotted the ratio thing where Trump would get 1 vote for every 48 votes that Biden got, then after a period of time, the ratio would stop in certain districts, but start in others, etc.?
Your data might fold in nicely with his.
https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html
Yeah! I saw that.
These examples all sort seem to parts of the same 'whole'; likely systemic election fraud via dominion, smartmatic software, etc etc etc.
You have the widespread voter fraud cases as well which are likely enough on their own to have the SCOTUS toss batches of inherently fraudulent ballot dumps. However, the entire election fraud aspect of this all is what will eventually need to be torn out from the roots if we're going to resolve the corruption in nearly every government institution.
Hopefully, that's the end game play.
....but hey, I'm speaking to choir here lol.
Its civil court. Go read up on the preponderance of evidence