Giving publishers (Fakebook, Twatter, et al) protections of a platform has shown the need for reform. The internet is a new technology, and we need to look at how it is handled in a new way.
If someone were to go on a forum that is focused on model airplanes and decided to post all over about their obsession with sex toys, I would expect to see the posts deleted for being off topic and if the behavior persisted I would expect to see them banned.
Facebook claims to be a neutral service that welcomes all viewpoints. We do not claim to be such a place. Not even close. The first rule listed in our rules section is, "Trump Supporters -
This is The Donald. Our community is a high-energy Trump rally. There are no exceptions."
Is that still too difficult for you to understand, or do I need to break it down for you further?
TD is an internet discussion forum for supporters of President Trump - you're reaching, bud.
Giving publishers (Fakebook, Twatter, et al) protections of a platform has shown the need for reform. The internet is a new technology, and we need to look at how it is handled in a new way.
Your point is very stupid. Straight up.
If someone were to go on a forum that is focused on model airplanes and decided to post all over about their obsession with sex toys, I would expect to see the posts deleted for being off topic and if the behavior persisted I would expect to see them banned.
Facebook claims to be a neutral service that welcomes all viewpoints. We do not claim to be such a place. Not even close. The first rule listed in our rules section is, "Trump Supporters - This is The Donald. Our community is a high-energy Trump rally. There are no exceptions."
Is that still too difficult for you to understand, or do I need to break it down for you further?
I do see what you're getting at. I also see that you have no clue about section 230 or the difference between a website like Facebook vs. T_D.
It is very clear you're trying to sound more intelligent than you are. You're out of your depth.