...or at least announced their intention to do so. However, truth is a defense against libel and slander.
They would open themselves up to discovery when she fought back. If there is no truth to it, they would have proof and they would do so in a heartbeat. Instead, they're hiding and sending PR flunkies out.
She is not risking her reputation, career, and livelihood on a LARP, not a chance. She is too smart.
And Dominion contract was taken down and reuploaded in a redacted form
And their employees just this week deleted their LinkedIn profiles. And they abandoned their offices inToronto, too
Yeah, this is super sketch. And part of why I think Sidney is right.
This is the first time someone has responded to my comment with spam. What an honor!
don't click link.. selling coins
Get the Remnant OUT OUT OUT!
I'm really curious as to why the DOJ sent a flight out to Toronto for 3 days, last week.
Dominion is a CIA front organization, for stealing elections around the world. They would rather disappear, then continue to pretend to be legitimate.
"...if they were anything other than a james bond villain comglomerate of comical proportions..."
Love that quote lol
Shills here are desperate to get people to give up on her case.
Trump has already tweeted about the 2.7 million votes Dominion switched electronically, retweeted a total endorsement of Powell's credibility, and his legal team let her speak at their press conference despite not having her on payroll. Anyone trying to discredit her is either a doomer or a shill.
I believe Sidney was onto something originally, but then she started going off on bigger rabbit holes (Trump won California, Obama hacked the 2012 election, going back and forth about the servers being seized but then said she doesn't know). She made some huge new claims yesterday saying she was going to blow up Georgia. But she has yet to file anything or release anything other than a single affidavit. The Kraken was supposed to be a bombshell, and it became next week, then the week after, then eventually she said she already released it weeks ago....
So far its been noise that was distracting from the simple and solid evidence we already have and need.
The person I trust most is Trump. And if he publicly released a statement distancing himself from her, its for a damn good reason.
I support Powell and her efforts, but we already have a winnable, solid, and simple case with Rudy's evidence. That is what we need to focus on for the Presidency, then let Powell follow up to clean up the deep state.
I never said ignore her.
So many people are getting emotionally invested in her, that if you express any bit of criticism, they erupt in anger. I felt myself going down that path.
All I said is that I trust Trump, and if Trump went through the effort to publicly distance himself from her, there was a good reason for that. After watching Barnes today, that reason becomes very clear.
By the way, I donated to Powell last week. But I have since seen her go down bigger and bigger rabbit holes. Regarding the servers, its clear that she is getting her information from the Gateway Pundit article and repeating it. That's the only issue I started noticing with her, she would parrot random information sent to her by people without vetting it. I think Trump's team noticed that it was creating too much noise to distract from the solid and winnable evidence we already have.
I look forward to seeing the lawsuit Powell files by the end of this week. I hope she was able to build a 100% bulletproof case. But at this point, its more "show me the evidence" before I get further emotionally invested. I think the best route now is let her do her own thing, while Trump's team secures the Presidency.
Powell was never part of Trump's legal team, so today's statement is not Trump distancing himself from her. There are good reasons for their statement, I agree, but your explanation is speculation and not helpful. Barnes has been defending Tucker today so I wouldn't put much stock in his opinion either.
Powell mentioned 4 countries with lines into the server. Where do you think she got that information?
For the record, here's the post Trump retweeted vouching for Powell's credibility:
https://twitter.com/txelectionlaw/status/1328374748959694850
Why would they release a statement just for the hell of it?
That makes zero sense. Powell started making some grander and grander claims. I think it became apparent, strategy wise, that they wanted to publicly distance themselves from her.
And there's nothing wrong with that. Its not an attack on Powell and there's no reason to get angry about it. Its the best strategy going forward.
Rudy already has more than enough evidence. And after listening to actual trial lawyers weigh in, its best to keep the lawsuits simple and only keep the strong evidence we have. Don't risk your queen for a long distance play across the board.
Hence the statement, to clarify and separate Powell's claims vs. what Trump is currently fighting in court.
I also don't know what to think of sidney. I do think she gets a lot of information what is parroted here and on 4chan and I believe just because it originates from there doesn't mean it isn't true (notice dominion bailing on Friday's hearing). I mean the whole thing just REEKS of foul play. But what I'm not sure about is how it will hold in court. I'm not familiar with law so I wouldn't be able to give an accurate judgement if tying things here and there is enough to prove beyond doubt there was fraud with the machines. What we need from her is a smoking gun. Will she deliver, we will have to wait and see. She seems strikingly confident so perhaps she has a whistleblower.
However I have a lot of faith in Rudy and Lin Wood because the basis of their arguments are constitutional. That will ring loudly in SCOTUS so I'm not worrying about PA and GA.
I think michigan I'll need clarification on though. They rescinded the certification but they still signed (under duress) so it's unclear if the certification is still valid.
That's the problem and that's what Barnes Law said tonight. And that's what I started observing. I think she was on direction at the start but started taking the bait on disinformation from all these sources that I see parroted on here and other places.
Maybe that stuff is true, but to prove all that stuff, you need some extraordinary evidence. I simply don't see how Powell could garner evidence that quickly to the point where it wouldn't get laughed out of the court.
Also I fear that people are starting to become too emotionally dependent on Powell. Any question raised about her you get downvoted and attacked into oblivion. It reminds me of Q stuff, like with Jeff Sessions and "trust the plan."
Here's the video I watched which gives more perspective on this: https://youtu.be/YYJUjkpjZbo?t=911
Supposedly she started pushing out other Trump lawyers and was taking over the message and going down these rabbit holes that are hard to prove, so that's what resulted in the statement to distance themselves from her.
I have a lot of faith in Rudy's evidence. He has more than enough to prove the fraud in multiple states.
When did she say the "kraken" was a bombshell? I don't remember he ever explicitly stating it was any PARTICULAR thing. She's never said what the "kraken" is. Personally, I don't think it's anything. It's just an expression she used, and she's basically meaning she's about to tear it all down. It just kinda caught on, and she's been riding the wave to bring attention to her case in a viral way.
Part of a successful suit would require proof that Sidney knows what she is saying is untrue, not just that it is untrue. I don't think anyone doubts Sidney thinks it is true.
If they sue and fail not because she was right but because they can’t prove she was knowingly spreading falsehoods then they expose internal documents through discovery and look guilty of her accusations to the lay public. Seems like a lot to lose.
There are very good election law based cases to make already outside of what she is accusing that don’t have nearly the impediments to success. I’m all for letting her continue, but public focus should be on the immediate while she forms her case(s).
Who said Sydney Powell is making things up other than Liberals?
Trumps team clarifying that Sydney Powell is working independently does not in any way imply Sydney is making things up
Sydney claims she felt the need to personally ask Trump if it was OK to release the Kraken. In the following weeks Sydney and Rudy have done press conferences together. If Sydney was full of shit then Trumps Team would NOT be doing press conferences with Sydney
A lot of yall are currently doing leftists work by sowing doubt in Powell. We dont even need these types of posts. It sounds like there is doubt in Powell amongst Trump supporters when there is NOT. But if you guys keep talking like this then there might start to be some.
Some people on here were saying that...doomers perhaps. But I felt it needed to be said.
Discovery is a wonderful thing. Same reason the pedos in Hollywood never sue when people call them out online.
Exactly! If they sue they have to go thru discovery so yes please do sue her lol
The fact that they are deleting their work profiles..and leaving their offices, and deleting other information off the internet AFTER being accused is very telling. Leftists are complete dipshits to think otherwise.
Some of the things could be wrong, but they don't sue, because that would open them up to discovery, which might reveal different, worse, things.
I’d be scared shitless to sue that woman.
Bingo Halls are closed.
Yahtzee, then.
They can’t sue her, she has immunity.
As in certain other types of defamation claims, in a business disparagement claim, the statement at issue must have been made with “actual malice.” Despite the name, “actual malice” doesn’t involve hatred or revenge. Instead, “actual malice” occurs when a person makes a claim despite either knowing the claim is false or recklessly disregarding the chance that the statement is false.
A business disparagement claim may be defeated, however, if the person who made the statement enjoys an absolute or conditional privilege that protects the speaker or the statement.
“Absolute” privileges fall into only a handful of categories. For instance, statements made during a legislative or judicial proceeding typically enjoy absolute privilege.
exactly
She's smart but also having people send her thousands of things and I think the stress is causing her to chase rabbit holes.
I've been following her very closely and she's getting deeper into it, she's susceptible chasing almost anything that is sent to her, and now making claims that Trump won California, Obama hacked the 2012 election, Trump won every state with a 6+ margin, the servers were seized, etc.
Those are huge claims. And perhaps they are true, I wouldn't be surprised. But to prove that in court you need to have extraordinary and substantial evidence. Does she have that? No one knows.
She said she was going to release the Kraken last week (which was supposed to be so big that it would change everything) but that turned into her saying she already released it a week before that. Then she released a single affidavit, which wouldn't do anything in court.
Now its become #KrakenOnSteroids and she doesn't know when she will be able to release that....
I believe she is onto something, like you said, Dominion could sue her for defamation. But from what I'm seeing, she is prone to falling down rabbit holes and already repeated a few false things simply because she saw them somewhere else, without vetting them.
Trump simply wants to focus on the simple, strong arguments and evidence that is winnable in court and distance themselves from derailing of chasing Q theories, which will destroy credibility of their case.
Hopefully she eventually files something big, but we only have 2 weeks left. I think if we stay focused on Trump and Rudy's case, we have more than enough to win right now.
She said late this week this was a civil case, not a criminal case, and the burden of proof is diff, and you dont even need to present your proof at this early stage of the case but she is trying to get it all together early anyway, and hopes to file by the end of this week.
We have 2 weeks left until the electors start meeting and 3 weeks left until they vote, so hopefully she's able to get it by the end of this week.
If she doesn't have the proof and makes those claims...she is toast. She is smart enough to know what she can and can't say without ruining her life.
I hope so, she said she would release a lawsuit in GA on Friday this week. So we'll need to see and find out if her claims match what she files and then hope the judge and defense can't find any holes in it. I'm rooting for her that its as huge as she says.
If it gets tick tocked again, its going to hurt her credibility though.