552
Comments (40)
sorted by:
15
Italians_Invented_2A 15 points ago +15 / -0

Great video!

Important points:

  1. She says that she has evidence the software was used to rig these elections, not just that the software had the feature to do so.
  2. She'll file the lawsuit in the next couple of weeks (this interviews was last Friday).
2
Serioush 2 points ago +2 / -0

"next couple of weeks" still seems rather slow,

isn't there a rather strict time limit, before electoral collage has to conclude something?

0
tiredofwinning2020 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why did he call her the lead attorney on the Trump legal team? She didn’t correct him either.

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

She's still one the lead attorney that is trying to remedy the fraudulent elections. We're all in the same team.

1
tiredofwinning2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

She is but not for the Trump team.

11
247MAGA 11 points ago +14 / -3

I'm a little worried that maybe she's just referring to the screenshots we've all seen here (and videos too) of news casts and Edison data showing huge increases for biden and deductions for Trump? Something about the way she worded it (saying screenshots rather than video or pictures) that has me a little worried that her case is going to be what we've all already seen (and is pretty bad) but the normies haven't....I really hope I'm wrong here

Edit- i re-listened and I was wrong ahe said pictures not screenshots... and she said devices to watch it live... God i hope she has a bombshell

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
11
Heck 11 points ago +11 / -0

Stop dooming. You have nothing to worry about.

3
TheHoeAndJoe420 3 points ago +3 / -0

I understand why you feel that way. She definitely mentions everything on here. It wouldn't be smart to reveal any evidence she has that isn't publicly known . Since the media ignores whats already known I guess it's nice she's putting it out there.

2
Kekist-Prime 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why would she show the main evidence in a case before it is even filed? Just keep calm and wait for this to unfold. It will be legendary.

0
Italians_Invented_2A 0 points ago +1 / -1

But why hasn't the case been filed yet? It's been 20 days now.

0
gtr1017 0 points ago +1 / -1

go suck an egg

5
Phil_DeGraves 5 points ago +6 / -1

Sidney Powell says they had people watching and recording the fraud in real time

Annnnnd, there's that rumor of election night in the SCIF, yepyep.

Sounds like it might've been true!

4
Brandidh 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes! A lot of people were saying Trump was expecting it-- remember at first when people were saying he watermarked the ballots? If not that, I wouldn't be surprised if he had some preparation to catch it. They already knew because it happened to Bernie.

4
tiredofwinning2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did anyone else catch the fact that he said that she is the lead attorney on the Trump campaign legal team?? Right at 2:51.

1
rn10950 1 point ago +1 / -0

After watching this, that comment and the end when she talks about the 501c4 may explain the statement today in its entirety.

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you mean?

1
rn10950 1 point ago +1 / -0

The statement by Rudy today claiming that Sidney is practicing law on her own may have been made to correct the claim that she was the director of the legal team. At the end of the video, she talks about https://defendingtherepublic.org/, Powell's new legal defense fund. If she were truly working for the campaign from the beginning, she would not need a defense fund as she would have been paid by the campaign. It is my layperson understanding that she will be filing cases on behalf of "the people", which she does have standing to do as the voters are most certainly a party in these cases.

0
Italians_Invented_2A 0 points ago +1 / -1

Which means we're fucked.

The only way Sidney could have the evidences she claims she has is only if the military was collaborating with her.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
neosin 2 points ago +3 / -1

so much winning

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
yanksali 1 point ago +1 / -0

Flipping votes is the best legal argument to make, better than all the others - dead voters, non resident voters, phony ballots

But when you combine everything this was the biggest cluster fuck of an election,

1
yanksali 1 point ago +1 / -0

We conduct elections which is the envy of every third world country having an election for the first time.

1
Ventura 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dead. To. Rights.

1
sperg 1 point ago +1 / -0

this is why, the tweet today

1
kesh2011 1 point ago +1 / -0

This woman is bad ass!!!!!

1
letrain 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's why scotus.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
BoilingEnema 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm going to laugh for days if they have the zoom meeting where they shut it down and planed the steal.

-17
Nat_Libertarian -17 points ago +3 / -20

I simply do not trust Sydney Powell anymore.

I am not concern trolling, I just refuse to back these insane claims without evidence. I will wait until she reveals the evidence to back these conspiracy theories, but until then I will not blindly trust every word she says.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
Wtf_socialismreally 3 points ago +3 / -0

You do you, but the Dems are all in so we should be too.

2
Heck 2 points ago +3 / -1

Shill.

1
airgag 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plenty of public evidence already.

Which statements you don't believe?

-5
Nat_Libertarian -5 points ago +1 / -6

All of the Q-level bullshit and the insane accusations.

Look, I'm sorry, but even though it is clear as day that the Democrats cheated I am going to need to wait for her to submit evidence of claims like the seizure of Scytle servers in Germany.

It did not happen. Our only source is a tweet in German that the internet has been spinning around for the last two weeks or so.

1
airgag 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair enough, no public evidence to proof the seizure of servers in Germany.

0
gtr1017 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't trust you