24
posted ago by FreeSpeechMaster ago by FreeSpeechMaster +24 / -0

We know the "Army" didn't seize them.

If they were seized, it would have had to have been an agency that works in Europe as a partnership to the U.S.

Has anyone catagorically come out and said that they are in America's possession?

The facts surrounding this tidbit, seemed to ping pong all over the place with nothing really "solid" to grasp. Do we really need them, knowing what we know about the ballot dumps, the observers, burned ballots, ballot harvesting, etc?

Comments (39)
sorted by:
3
davidw221 3 points ago +3 / -0

That whole story is sketchy at best.

1
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know, right? My only thing is that Powell and Guliani talk regularly, so Guliani could possibly have knowledge of this, since he probably speaks to the President every day. If there were any truth to it, Guliani would know and pass that information to Powell, be a few facts or knowledge of the entire raid (if there was one) and where the servers ended up (if they went anywhere).

I just don't know if we even needed the servers, knowing what we know through our own sheer stats. It's seems overwhelming.

2
davidw221 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your statement seems reasonable, BUT! it's so damn hard to see who the Patriots and the Deep Staters are these day!

1
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

No kidding. Unfortunately, there's no "line" that we can see, that separates the two. It seems to be a murky, mish-mash of a venn diagram, where they dip their toes in and out of patriotism and deep state outhouse at will.

2
brickinthewall 2 points ago +2 / -0

With everything else we have, the server, if it exists, would be just a cherry on top. Might be the "hard proof" to convince a few normies but isn't really needed at this point IMO.

2
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. 100%. In fact, in my case, the only proof I needed to see that there was massive cheating, was that a guy that had no energy or enthusiasm and never left his basement got over 40 million votes....and they're trying to tell us 80 million. LMAO.

1
jonnyy 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://scytl.us/scytls-role-in-2020-us-general-election/ "We are not tied to Smartmatic, SGO, Dominion or Indra"

https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VotingSystems/files/2015/countyEvaluationForms/Mesa.pdf Search "Scytl"

"The export process was very easy. After the initial configuration it only took the push of 1 button. The initial configuration took less than 2 minutes. We did have to run the data through a macro to upload it to Scytl. Even that did not take longer than 30 seconds. The whole process was shorter than w/ our legacy system"

So they lie when they say that Scytl has no ties to Dominion!

1
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It seems that the word "lying" is now subjective, no matter how contrary to the facts something is. The other big lie is that Dominion voting machines are not in every state. A simple look at the WIKI article on dominion shows they BOUGHT ES&S voting machines, so between them and dominion, they ARE in every state.

1
kag-2020- 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would we need euro trash to help us take our server out of our own consulate?

1
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

A) It wasn't in a consulate.

B) You can't operate on foreign soil without permission, unless you've declared war against them. We have not. Eurotrash or not.

C) In any foreign operation, it is typical to get help from the nation you are operating in, just as an act of political good will.

1
kag-2020- 1 point ago +1 / -0

So your argument hinges on the fact it wasn't the CIA operating out of a Consulate? That's, literally the whole claim...

2
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's no consensus on this, that's EXACTLY what I'm saying. The most abundant claim doesn't even mention the CIA. It mentions military only.

1
kag-2020- 1 point ago +1 / -0

Go read your last post. Part A specifically.

1
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay. I re-read. What's up? What am I not getting?

1
kag-2020- 1 point ago +1 / -0

A) It wasn't in a consulate.

There's no consensus on this, that's EXACTLY what I'm saying.

That's not exactly what you're saying. In fact, it's the exact opposite of what you're saying, lmfao!!!

1
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

No offense, if you are a Pede, but you have a hard time following. The "no consensus" comment was referring to it being CIA or Military, not the fact that it was or was not a consulate.

If you're trying to split hairs, just to engage in some kind of devil's advocate role, you should probably try another thread. If not, and you're sincerely confused, then I apologize in advance.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because our military cannot invade a foreign, sovereign country. We would have needed permission and had we gotten permission, there are other agencies that would have handled it besides the military. No nation would allow another nations military to drive hummers with 50 cals attached to the roof down their streets to raid one of their businesses. It would be done in a much more subtle manner with German intelligence "leading" the raid (with the U.S. secretly in charge).

2
P.e.flynn93 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean we do have american troops in Germany. 🤷‍♂️ idk though..and perhaps they didn't drive in big hummers with .50cals and went about it more discreetly. Just my thoughts.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
namechangearoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought we had some kind a of agreement with Germany for this type of stuff since WW2 and we still have active installations throughout Germany.

1
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

We have bases in Germany, but we can't just use our military to raid a private industry that is located in one of their cities. Things have to be much more diplomatic than that...especially with Mr. Merkel over there, cunt that he is. Instead of Hummers with guns and fatigues, it's suburbans with ray bans and suits.

2
jonnyy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm german and I can say it is possible but only in supporter role. They need the agreement of our government. But our government is far left so I doubt that this is true.

1
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

This!

That's why I doubt it and why I cringed when Powell mentioned it...but maybe that's why she said, "I am hearing"....so it's ambiguous and easily walked back.

2
jonnyy 2 points ago +2 / -0

sometimes I think Sidney only know what the internet "know". And this includes a lot of bs. But I don't know why she would be so confident then. She will lose everything if she give 50% of the us population false hope. If this is all bs why is she doing that?

1
kiwibloke 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is was a US ambasady, located in Germany

1
NazisWereSocialist 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the server raid is fake then Sydney Powell has nothing

1
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, that's completely untrue. Just here, at thedonald, we've seen enough evidence to overwhelm anyone that would question the validity of this election. In addition to that, she has over 200 affidavits. Those aren't nothing.

2
NazisWereSocialist 2 points ago +2 / -0

We have an insane amount of information that looks like fraud or shows the potential for fraud we have no smoking guns

1
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know about that. Math is a pretty good gun.

1
NazisWereSocialist 1 point ago +1 / -0

The math claims were made in venezuala too and another statistician dismissed them, idk who is right but the same will happen here.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
FreeSpeechMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey Newbie....I didn't say that at all. Read. Respond in kind or don't respond at all.