It would then be the fault of the person who passed the illegal law. The correct thing for the SCOTUS to do would be to throw them out. They aren't the ones disenfranchising.
Correct, by mixing them, the state of PA willfully soiled ALL of the ballots. They chose, not the courts, to risk disenfranchising the people of PA.
This is going to happen one of three ways. SCOTUS will order a new election in PA, and you had better believe that people will be watching them like hawks. OR SCOTUS will simply toss ALL mail in ballots. OR SCOTUS will tell the state legislature to appoint whatever slate of electors it wants.
It would then be the fault of the person who passed the illegal law. The correct thing for the SCOTUS to do would be to throw them out. They aren't the ones disenfranchising.
Correct, by mixing them, the state of PA willfully soiled ALL of the ballots. They chose, not the courts, to risk disenfranchising the people of PA.
This is going to happen one of three ways. SCOTUS will order a new election in PA, and you had better believe that people will be watching them like hawks. OR SCOTUS will simply toss ALL mail in ballots. OR SCOTUS will tell the state legislature to appoint whatever slate of electors it wants.
So then you throw out the whole election.