Yes, the Equal Protection clause of the 14th amendment.
Source: listening to Styxhexenhmer666 laying out the simple Constitutional case for this over at Rumble, and looking a few things up this AM as he doubled-down with the Sidney fireworks from yesterday being a classic Trump maneuver for 4D chess, take it for what you will...
I might be confusing the nature of the case, but one of the things I though they were going to argue in this case, was that PA changed the election law unconstitutionally (only state legislature can do that). GA had a similar situation and so did MI, I think.
A county clerk in a dem stronghold in WI changed the rules on ID requirements. According to the US Constitution only the state legislature had authority to do that and it created unequal treatment of ballots among different counties. There's more I'm sure, but that's off the top of my head.
Prob is PA is already so corrupt that standard logical arguments may not hold at initial passes. Used to live there years ago and would never go back. It’s a HUGE Problem.
In fact—I may need to ping their voter page and see if somebody voted in my name!!!!
We need more than PA. How are the lawsuits going in other states?
My understanding of the strategy, is that if we win in PA, it will create legal precedent that can be used in other states....GA, MI, WI.
Yes, the Equal Protection clause of the 14th amendment.
Source: listening to Styxhexenhmer666 laying out the simple Constitutional case for this over at Rumble, and looking a few things up this AM as he doubled-down with the Sidney fireworks from yesterday being a classic Trump maneuver for 4D chess, take it for what you will...
I thought the PA strategy hinged on the vast number of ballots that came in after the 8:00 deadline, that Alito nixed?
Almost positive they were curing in Arizona
I might be confusing the nature of the case, but one of the things I though they were going to argue in this case, was that PA changed the election law unconstitutionally (only state legislature can do that). GA had a similar situation and so did MI, I think.
A county clerk in a dem stronghold in WI changed the rules on ID requirements. According to the US Constitution only the state legislature had authority to do that and it created unequal treatment of ballots among different counties. There's more I'm sure, but that's off the top of my head.
PA will set the tone and some precedent for the other states
Prob is PA is already so corrupt that standard logical arguments may not hold at initial passes. Used to live there years ago and would never go back. It’s a HUGE Problem.
In fact—I may need to ping their voter page and see if somebody voted in my name!!!!
Great.