424
Comments (5)
sorted by:
3
Centipede420 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've been refreshing for a month straight and hadn't seen this one yet so thanks

2
Belleoffreedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some time after election night, a very large batch of mail ballots were counted that showed an enormous advantage for Biden-This batch looks nothing like the mail ballots counted up to that point in the NYT data, and also looks different from the mail ballots counted later in each precinct as measured using the county’s own data -The batch looks implausible on its own face, in terms of relative vote shares of Libertarian and Republican votes -The updates are difficult to reconcile with simple data errors like genuine mail ballots being mis-classified as in-person, or a single candidate total being incorrectly entered as a typo.

-7
orange_dit -7 points ago +1 / -8

The word explosive is kind of misleading. It is a two day old article. When copying the title you can remove the word explosive or breaking. This was older news.

4
BadBoyCornPop 4 points ago +4 / -0

The word "Explosive" is in the headline of the article, don't blame OP.

Understanding these "anomalies" could be key to winning this.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0