posted ago by thonl +6 / -0

Vote totals/Recounts/Audits, etc, are all just a shiny object to chase after, if you really step back and look at it.

There are many states(TX being the most notable example) that would not certify these machines, because of glaring holes in their FedRAMP testing methodologies, that would have made certification of their use a criminal act by those certifying.

Then you look at states that did certify their use, and they never addressed the deficiencies that non-certifying states pointed out.

Anyone that does federal compliance stuff would know - this is federal "pound you in the ass" prison time for glossing over stuff like this. FedRAMP applies to voting machines used in federal elections, and those holding the keys dont give a shit about things like unsecured usb ports?

Compliance certification is all public record

Seems like just invalidating anything done on a Dominion/Smartmatic machine is demanded, given the circumstance.

Comments (1)
sorted by:
1
superpsycho 1 point ago +1 / -0

These are fraud machines. One look at the user panel makes it obvious. There is absolutely no reason to provide features that force vote allocation. A secure system would be dedicated to its target function and nothing else. These things where designed for the manipulation of votes.