Nazis made usury illegal and revamped the entire banking system such that money was not created out of debt as it is in any country with a central banking authority. Germany went from failed state to one of the most successful countries in Europe in about a decade as a result
Who do you suppose shared with them the secret of optimal financial policy?
Could it have been the globalist bankers who needed German patriots and Russian patriots culled once more, after the first great cull failed to stick?
Or perhaps it was Hitler, the theretofore starving artist, who somehow chanced upon that knowledge?
International bankers did not like this and were definitely not backing Germany
Hi, and I recommend you read up on Prescott Bush, then on Smedley Butler. The globalists on wall street were widely and openly supporting the nazis. And why not? Globalist bankers of the time were backing (a) fascists or (b) communists in every country.
Why? Bankers pump funding into both ideologies, neither of which can tolerate the existence of the other or anyone who disagrees with them. Presto! Instant polarization of society!
The bankers would like nothing more than for us to fall into their nazi mold. The formula for mobilizing the world to beat nazis and subduing former nazi countries is already known. By contrast, the only known solution to popular populists is for the CIA to kill their leaders (see south america, or jfk), but I doubt that'll happen this time around.
Wow I did not know about those two before. I should not have been so naive as to believe that there wasn't investment on every side in that era
It's alright, anon. They've been lying to us since before you and I were born. They have psychological research and big budgets and an utter lack of morality as assets to help them warp our beliefs.
The fact that our history is a lie is just the tip of the iceberg, I'm afraid. But it's a good starting point.
What was the "belle epoque"? How did it end?
You were also alluding to the fact that the knowledge of optimal financial policy was given to Hitler. I could believe that but haven't seen anything regarding that notion yet. If you have any other sources I am very interested in learning more.
I have no direct evidence that the knowledge of how to perfectly run an economy was given to Hitler, beyond circumstantial evidence:
Before being tasked by the SA with planting himself in a prominent position within the burgeoning German Workers' Party (predecessor to the nazis), Hitler was a fucking goof who couldn't even manage his own finances
Globalist bankers supported fascist movements worldwide, including in the US and Germany. Why would such support be limited to money?
Globalist bankers, having been the direct cause of the 1929 crash, knew perfectly well what makes economies crash, so it stands to reason they also knew how to avoid making them crash. They had the knowledge.
Not one single communist/globalist interest was harmed during the entirety of WW2... the weight of banker-backed fascism and war with incompatible banker-backed communists fell entirely upon patriots from every nation. The war served the bankers' interests, and no one else's.
Even though everyone seems to think the nazis were virulently anti-Jew and anti-banker, the highest ranking SS nazis and their best scientists defected to the zionist/City of London bank directed powers, where they got to work on such white genocide projects as MKUltra. They were on the same side all along...
Today, the antifa side is well established. But pay attention to the news' constant efforts to frame us as nazis. Remember the tiki torch "nazis" at Charlottesville? Were they even white supremacists at all? Antifa? Why would they stop there? They know sites like TD.win and Q boards are how we win converts. People are curious, they stop by to see what it's all about, and... AUGH, it's full of nazis (all of whom are plants). In order for this to work, they NEED to pigeonhole us as nazis. Then all their "antifascist" rhetoric works. After all, how is it "antifascist" to oppose the duly elected president of a republic, or justify stealing the election from someone who demonstrably isn't a fascist? Who funds all of these efforts to paint us as nazis?
Who do you suppose shared with them the secret of optimal financial policy?
Could it have been the globalist bankers who needed German patriots and Russian patriots culled once more, after the first great cull failed to stick?
Or perhaps it was Hitler, the theretofore starving artist, who somehow chanced upon that knowledge?
Hi, and I recommend you read up on Prescott Bush, then on Smedley Butler. The globalists on wall street were widely and openly supporting the nazis. And why not? Globalist bankers of the time were backing (a) fascists or (b) communists in every country.
Why? Bankers pump funding into both ideologies, neither of which can tolerate the existence of the other or anyone who disagrees with them. Presto! Instant polarization of society!
The bankers would like nothing more than for us to fall into their nazi mold. The formula for mobilizing the world to beat nazis and subduing former nazi countries is already known. By contrast, the only known solution to popular populists is for the CIA to kill their leaders (see south america, or jfk), but I doubt that'll happen this time around.
It's alright, anon. They've been lying to us since before you and I were born. They have psychological research and big budgets and an utter lack of morality as assets to help them warp our beliefs.
The fact that our history is a lie is just the tip of the iceberg, I'm afraid. But it's a good starting point.
What was the "belle epoque"? How did it end?
I have no direct evidence that the knowledge of how to perfectly run an economy was given to Hitler, beyond circumstantial evidence:
Before being tasked by the SA with planting himself in a prominent position within the burgeoning German Workers' Party (predecessor to the nazis), Hitler was a fucking goof who couldn't even manage his own finances
Globalist bankers supported fascist movements worldwide, including in the US and Germany. Why would such support be limited to money?
Globalist bankers, having been the direct cause of the 1929 crash, knew perfectly well what makes economies crash, so it stands to reason they also knew how to avoid making them crash. They had the knowledge.
Not one single communist/globalist interest was harmed during the entirety of WW2... the weight of banker-backed fascism and war with incompatible banker-backed communists fell entirely upon patriots from every nation. The war served the bankers' interests, and no one else's.
Even though everyone seems to think the nazis were virulently anti-Jew and anti-banker, the highest ranking SS nazis and their best scientists defected to the zionist/City of London bank directed powers, where they got to work on such white genocide projects as MKUltra. They were on the same side all along...
Today, the antifa side is well established. But pay attention to the news' constant efforts to frame us as nazis. Remember the tiki torch "nazis" at Charlottesville? Were they even white supremacists at all? Antifa? Why would they stop there? They know sites like TD.win and Q boards are how we win converts. People are curious, they stop by to see what it's all about, and... AUGH, it's full of nazis (all of whom are plants). In order for this to work, they NEED to pigeonhole us as nazis. Then all their "antifascist" rhetoric works. After all, how is it "antifascist" to oppose the duly elected president of a republic, or justify stealing the election from someone who demonstrably isn't a fascist? Who funds all of these efforts to paint us as nazis?