I've been deeply considering this idea, and while it makes me iII to think about, perhaps it's a necessary eviI. If people who have dirt on them are given the chance for reprieve should greater criminaIities be unearthed from their testimony? Only speaking specifically on very specific stuff like anything considered potential espion age or sedition, not just anything. Done around, not through, the doj, of course, perhaps through a separate entity linked to the house.
While the prospect of letting one of these freaks walk disgusting to think about, the idea of these freaks banding together is even more harrowing a scenario.
"Hey Elon, I have a lot of 'voluntolds' for you..."
It's going to be tangled. The Rachel Chandler/Virginia/etc ... "Well, I was a minor brainwashed into recruiting more girlfriends and then continued..."
Victim ... and ... superpredator. Hum.
Similar stuff from all angles going to be going on.
When they have someone dead-to-rights on something, the "Plea Bargain" portion tends to be something like "Spill absolutely everything you know, right this second, and we'll at least consider thinking about reducing things. Maybe. But. If there's a single wrong thing - void."
Since memory imperfect - - always at the total mercy of the prosecution (assuming the prosecution isn't aiming to let them off the hook.)