7727
I cant wait to witness the meltdown from the left.. (media.thedonald.win)             MAGA            
posted ago by LucidDreamer +7729 / -2
Comments (754)
sorted by:
362
FuckCuomo 362 points ago +382 / -20 (edited)

Roberts is a liberal.

Alito is based.

Clarence hates Biden.

Kavanaugh hates Kamala.

Barret is a wild card but I think she's fresh with anger over the left's attacks on her nomination.

So we just need Gorsuch. But he worries me.

338
FireannDireach 338 points ago +347 / -9

Barret is a wild card

No, she isn't. She's a Constitutionalist, and an Originalist. We know her whole career has been about supporting the Constitution. Everything about this election is a subversion of that.

196
asdf1234567 196 points ago +200 / -4

add to the fact the that kamala was asking her dumbass questions like "how many bubbles are in soap?"

95
MightyEighth 95 points ago +97 / -2

Tf is this real? I missed this. I bet Kamala knows a lot about blowing bubbles from watching joe tho

119
OVERMENSCH 119 points ago +120 / -1

You should have just stopped at 'I bet Kamala knows a lot about blowing'

46
Reave 46 points ago +47 / -1

She totally should have said, you tell me, you are the expert on blowing.

9
GreatestPresidentEvr 9 points ago +9 / -0

Oh please, everyone knows Hunter is the "blow" expert in the Biden circle.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
14
warringeagle 14 points ago +16 / -2

just look at the stretch marks around her mouth. hoe's a pro

-47
deleted -47 points ago +2 / -49
21
deleted 21 points ago +22 / -1
-4
deleted -4 points ago +5 / -9
8
MightyEighth 8 points ago +8 / -0

Why not both

3
RigorMortis27 3 points ago +4 / -1

She counted the bubbles from my Irish spring on my balls last night with her serpent tongue. Faced fucked a bit of freedom in her Marxist brain cavity.

15
asdf1234567 15 points ago +20 / -5
21
shodingers_trap 21 points ago +24 / -3 (edited)

idk, video cut out all context, she could have ben asking it as an example of a dumb question. must. go. deeper....

Edit> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frk8EI7W5B4

YA, fucking knew it. Kamila is not asking Amy this as a serous question but as part of some rambling bushing about the voting rights act.

21
comooragh 21 points ago +22 / -1

Ironically millions of fraudulent ballots violate the civil rights act.

6
D0NNIE_DARK0 6 points ago +7 / -1

It’s a feature not a bug. Rules for thee and not for me.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
7
TinyKraken 7 points ago +7 / -0

One thousand seven hundred and seventy six

9
thewashambro 9 points ago +9 / -0

I bet Kamala knows a lot about blowing

Should've stopped talking right there.

1
MightyEighth 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why not both?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
16
jdog 16 points ago +16 / -0

Why can't you tell me how long rope is?!

15
SvixGale 15 points ago +16 / -1

Does it matter as long as it's long enough to go around a commie's neck?

5
Megladonald 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well it needs to fit around the neck snuggly and also needs to be extra length of rope to tie/fasten to things, etc

3
plastic_Strawman 3 points ago +4 / -1

And if it's too long the drop won't stop at the correct point.

2
Pau1F01ey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Too tight and you won’t be hanging but decapitating someone

3
UK_Pede 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s twice as long as one end to its middle.

2
litux 2 points ago +2 / -0

Our Literature teacher back in high school ridiculed a student for not knowing the date of the Good Friday. Not the current year's Good Friday, mind you, nor the original Good Friday; just the date of Good Friday, because it happened to be mentioned in a novel we were reading. A novel taking place a hundred years ago.

8
Not_Quite_Savage 8 points ago +8 / -0

Kamala toe will blow anything that gives her more power, including a bubble.

3
AlphaOmaga 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is it sad that I don’t know if you are exaggerating or not. Lol.

1
1
AlphaOmaga 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol. Sounds like a stupid euphemism. But that’s still hilarious.

39
deleted 39 points ago +53 / -14
17
deleted 17 points ago +24 / -7
4
winsome 4 points ago +4 / -0

48 upvotes (above) for dissing ACB, hmmm...

4
SvixGale 4 points ago +4 / -0

Links please...?

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
SvixGale 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks!

-2
thewashambro -2 points ago +6 / -8

I' pretty sure she didn't rule against churches, she sided with them. Also, if she didn't she was just following higher court precedent.

21
Lenguado 21 points ago +22 / -1

Sooooo,

She follows the Constitution - except if there is precedent, even if the precedent is Unconstitutional - and then, Eh.....

Yeah, can someone please point me to the clause that says, "This Constitution applies at all times, except if someone might get sick"? Though, maybe that is why we don't follow the Constitution any more. No matter what - someone somewhere might get sick!

Doesn't sound very Constitutionalist to me....

(The above doesn't mean I don't hope she will be different than Roberts, but the idea that she is a STRICT Constitutionalist was and is DOA.)

5
Random_Aussie 5 points ago +5 / -0

On a lower court, she's literally not allowed to break a higher court's precedent, or she would just be overruled.

1
Lenguado 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think that is completely true. I think that she would have been setting precedent, not breaking it, with an opposite decision.

Yes, previously, we have enforced quarantines for folks who WERE sick and contagious. But the decision could have set precedent that we do NOT quarantine (or keep apart) healthy folks who were NOT contagious.

And precedent is not a hard and fast rule that is inviolate. It is most certainly a very strong guiding principle, but precedent can most certainly be broken for a number of reasons. Breaking precedent is a way of getting rid of bad law. It's not done a lot, but it does happen.

Again, I'm not anti ACB, and very much do hope that she does rule as a Constitutionalist. I am however, disappointed and disagreed with her Church ruling.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
JimmieK 3 points ago +7 / -4

Yeah I’m not buying the Barrett lockdown queen and forced inoculations crap from a “news source that has headlines which are little more copied and paste from patriots comment at sections.

2
STAX 2 points ago +2 / -0

How about from a based constitutional lawyer? https://www.bitchute.com/video/7D4RTu46ZuoD/

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
27
FullMetalMello 27 points ago +30 / -3

Then why didn't she take the PA mail-in case the week before the election? There was an emergency petition for the 4-4 tie. A lot of this election fraud could have been avoid if she stepped in.

39
deleted 39 points ago +44 / -5
16
FullMetalMello 16 points ago +21 / -5

That was a BS excuse. Also, it wasn’t a fringe case. The PA Republicans refiled the case for an emergency injunction after she was confirmed. She is a Supreme Court justice she could have read 80 pages of court filings the few days before and ruled on the case. The truth is she is scared that the press would write mean things about her.

4
Thenung89 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bruh did you see the things they wrote and said about her during, before, and after her confirmation? I don't think she really gives a shit what they write.

1
Carry_Your_Name 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, the corruption is systematic. Even if she interfered in the middle of the case and prevented the steal in PA, it would still not be enough to pass the 270 mark for Trump if Biden gets to steal the other critical swing states which he has stolen. It would only jeopardize her credibility, the left would trash her, they would claim that "the fix is in" like we say about traitor Roberts. We need a bigger SCOTUS ruling to close the loopholes and fix the whole election system, and to do that, the dark Dominion must be exposed and exterminated. That is the bigger picture beyond the struggle in one or two states.

1
WillyP702 1 point ago +1 / -0

Although I 100 agree with you that she should have stepped in. i don't care what the left's reaction is. They already rioted for 3 months. SO fuck'em but the bigger picture is we do need to keep the pressure off the other SCOTUS until it's time to do what they were putt there to do. Plus I have a feeling that President Trump wanted the Dems to feel so comfortable with cheating that they do it in a way that is obvious even to the average American.

5
The5thEstate 5 points ago +6 / -1

She couldn't spend some time reviewing the outlining basis, the arguments, and the reasoning for the previous deadlock? OK, not the best start, but let's see how it will play out this time around.

15
RANDOR0423 15 points ago +17 / -2

She wasn't in the SC then.

12
bjjmike69 12 points ago +13 / -1

Bro it literally was heard on her FIRST DAY. I hate how everyone brings this up. She was probably still figuring out who her assistants were going to be

12
Redwood 12 points ago +16 / -4

I heard she didn't have enough time to review the case.

11
FireannDireach 11 points ago +15 / -4

Because she didn't have time to prepare properly.

4
FullMetalMello 4 points ago +8 / -4

When there was a 4-4 tie she knew that the PA reps. would refile to get an injunction after she was confirmed because it was obviously unconditional and it would lead to the sh*tshow we are seeing in PA, GA, and all these other swing states. She could have read the 80 pages in a day and issued her opinion the next day, but she stabbed Trump in the back. She didn't take up this case because she didn't want to rock the boat.

4
Trumpsabro 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly, there's like three people who actually work with trump in DC

1
BackQuack 1 point ago +2 / -1

They just would have cheated another way to make up the difference. The fact that PA openly defied the ruling on October 28th to set aside votes obtained after the deadline should infuriate all of the justices.

1
WillyP702 1 point ago +1 / -0

/\ Thank you!!! People don't get how desperate the Dems were. They cheated multiple ways this election. The whole mail in voting and extending the vote count were just two of many ways they cheated.

They Trashed President Trump ballots.

They used the Dominions system to move votes from President Trump to Biden.

They paid people to sign ballots and vote for biden.

They had Democrat groups going around picking up votes.

They had someone corrupt POS going around to nursing homes and changing votes for Trump to Biden.

They went all out this election. They cheated every way they thought they could. There is a special place in hell for these people.

21
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 21 points ago +21 / -0

She probably knows that they killed Scalia.

4
SvixGale 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wat? [They] would NEVER do that!

They are the party of peace, love and tolerance!!!

Reeeeeeeee....

0
JimmieK 0 points ago +1 / -1

I thought he slipped and a pillow landed on his face which Unfortunately suffocated him

13
preferredfault 13 points ago +13 / -0

I feel like if things go our way, when she finally speaks on the ruling in this case, it's going to be like an adult splashing cold water on children who have run amuck.

125
donjongun 125 points ago +134 / -9

Can we please stop pretending that SCOTUS operates on emotional outrage and revenge and instead just let the courts operate in the realm of the law the way they were intended to...believing that Clarence Thomas and ACB are just waiting for revenge against Biden is silly. Let the evidence speak for itself when the time comes.

60
Shakakka99 60 points ago +66 / -6

People are human, even Supreme Court Justices. No matter how much you believe they can be strictly impartial, old wounds run deep and the heart remembers.

28
DJT_JR6544 28 points ago +29 / -1

Agreed. It has an impact. The law has a greater impact, and the lawful votes are what Trump is after.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
5
SvixGale 5 points ago +6 / -1

Agree 1,000,000%. I want ALL judges & justices to be totally impartial and abide by the Constitution 1,000%; but they ARE still human.....

2
KekistanPM 2 points ago +2 / -0

As humans I hope they understand what will happen if their ruling clears the path for Biden to be certified.

Tens of millions of free and mostly armed people don't like being told to live with a fraudulent election; or worse, being told it wasn't fraudulent despite the facts being to the contrary. And that the fate of their country would be in the hands of a geriatric Alzheimer's sufferer who hides in their basement day and night.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Shakakka99 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope you're right on Gorsuch, I'm worried he could go either way.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
45
Infidel 45 points ago +46 / -1

The left is screaming that Thomas has to recuse himself exactly because of Biden being such an asshole to him in 1991. I've never gotten a chance for revenge as sweet as Thomas. He better fucking take advantage of that shit. Think of how much this election has cost Joe Biden. If were to be denied the presidency due to fucking over this one dude 30 years ago it would be DELICIOUS. "I bet you regret calling me rape ape now Joseph. Your fate is now in my hands. I have been waiting for this day for 30 years. 30 long years..."

30
Italians_Invented_2A 30 points ago +30 / -0

The whole Demonrats dreams crushed by one black guy would be poetic justice

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
15
MaximoLiberatos 15 points ago +15 / -0

We have the most beautiful irony don't we folks?

10
donjongun 10 points ago +11 / -1

Please tell me Joe Biden didn't actually call Clarence Thomas "rape ape"

9
comooragh 9 points ago +9 / -0

Not in so many words but accusing someone of rape and potentially destroying their career is pretty much the same thing. Same playbook as Kegstand Kav too.

1
SvixGale 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was gonna say exactly this....KEK.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
7
ThePowerOfPrayer 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Washington Post was publishing Op/eds stating Thomas should recuse himself back in September if a case made it to the Supreme Court.

Clarence Thomas should recuse himself if the Supreme Court has to decide the election

https://archive.is/0PwnW

4
ehong 4 points ago +4 / -0

Let them suck dick. Thomas doesn't give any fucks about the fake news press

2
JerryJerryJerry 2 points ago +2 / -0

No backsies!

24
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 24 points ago +24 / -0

Sure. But the attitude is one more of

  • I know absolutely nothing about the legal system past what I learned in high school and from reading the Constitution

  • even I can see that some of these states have blatantly violated the law

  • therefore, SCOTUS has to see it even more, and won’t be inclined to give Biden any flexibility given their history

3
powershellder 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know absolutely nothing about the legal system past ... reading the Constitution

Don’t need much more than that.

17
deleted 17 points ago +19 / -2
10
DontDoxMeBro1 10 points ago +10 / -0

right, and this is what worries me. we are putting a heavy amount of pressure on 4-5 people to save this country. will it happen? I dont know, I was hoping the states would settle it, but that has not happened. Pinning our last hopes before a revolution on these people solely is asking for pain

4
Luckyladypede 4 points ago +5 / -1

If the Supreme Court does not do their job and follow the constitution this time, then they can have their powers be removed forever with a packed court and they can have themselves to blame for destroying the SC and this country

1
DocHolliday1776 1 point ago +2 / -1

They've got to know that's on the line.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
Mr_Fister 3 points ago +3 / -0

You think trump team was betting on the states that rigged their votes to overturn the election? State courts were never the plan

1
Carry_Your_Name 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump legal team definitely has had inrefutable evidence to prove systematic fraud, and these evidence will be presented on scourt, the only question is how the SCOTUS will rule on it. There are a few possible outcomes: a) fraud is proven and a majority of justices agree, but they see it insufficient to overturn the result; some individuals involved are sentenced to jail, ruling in favor of Biden; b) fraud is proven and sufficient, illegal ballots thrown out, result overturned, ruling in favor of Trump; c) electoral votes of the contested states are discounted, neither Biden nor Trump passes the 270 mark, the congress votes and Trump wins; d) results of the contested states invalidated, a do-over elections in those states without mail-ins and Dominion machines. I think b and d are very unlikely, nearly impossible; a lot of conservatives are betting on a, while c is the most likely pathway for Trump to victory. Such a decision would sufficiently punish the corrupt local officials of those states and kick the ball to the congress to decide who the next president is.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +3 / -6
2
Phil_DeGraves 2 points ago +2 / -0

But the problem is that these things are very very hard to prove.

Not when you have all the intercepted comms of the people who coordinated it all, as they did it.

Muhahahha.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Phil_DeGraves 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sidney said they had people watching and recording the fraud in realtime on election night.... which fits perfectly with that same rumor that was floating around 2 weeks ago.

3
Tokens_Worth 3 points ago +8 / -5

Shut up.
They are people.

59
Clarence_Thomas 59 points ago +62 / -3

Don't ever forget my good friend justice alito

25
UpTrump 25 points ago +26 / -1

Mr Thomas, can you help get Gorsucks on our side?

-37
deleted -37 points ago +1 / -38
9
UpTrump 9 points ago +10 / -1

DEPORT DEPORT

-13
deleted -13 points ago +1 / -14
6
UpTrump 6 points ago +6 / -0

DEPORT DEPORT

-12
deleted -12 points ago +1 / -13
7
Clarence_Thomas 7 points ago +8 / -1

FACT-CHECK : #FALSE

-14
deleted -14 points ago +1 / -15
4
UpTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

You are replying to Justice Thomas himself

1
OwnaLib87 1 point ago +1 / -0

TRUMPED

28
Bigcity157 28 points ago +30 / -2

Gorsuch should def worry you, he’s become a member of the black tie club around here and loves his fundraisers and Kennedy Center events.

3
Italians_Invented_2A 3 points ago +7 / -4

He worries me a lot. I feel he's a Marxist traitor after he legislated from the bench to give special privileges to homos and freaks

7
Dilaudid 7 points ago +13 / -6

Barret worries me more than Gorsuch. Gorsuch will never argue against the constitution.

8
Aoikaze2000 8 points ago +9 / -1

Well considering that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett says this about her:

Described as a protégée of Justice Antonin Scalia, for whom she clerked, Barrett supports an originalist interpretation of the Constitution.

I'm not sure how much we really should be worried here. That said, she's literally got no track record as a SCOTUS justice because she's so new so based off of her past... I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt.

-21
Italians_Invented_2A -21 points ago +9 / -30

The Constitution says that the states do whatever the fuck they want.

So constitutionalist does not mean she'll vote for us.

I also think she's a Marxist, entirely based on the fact that only a Marxist white woman would adopt black children, and foreigners too. She might also be blackmailable by the Clinton Foundation which operated in Haiti.

Finger crossed, but I'm nervous. We're in the hands of a possible SJW woman and a homo activist.

22
ThePowerOfPrayer 22 points ago +23 / -1

entirely based on the fact that only a Marxist white woman would adopt black children

That has got to be one of the dumbest things I've ever read on thedonald.win.

4
I_Keep_Forgetting 4 points ago +4 / -0

I also think she's a Marxist,

He had me going in the first half. I'm open to controversial opinions if they are reasonable,

entirely based on the fact that only a Marxist white woman would adopt black children, and foreigners too.

but this shit was straight out of bat country.

1
prospektor 1 point ago +2 / -1

I wouldn't take that as a sign of marxism, but it is troubling indeed, as it is peak virtue-signaling. If these leftist tactics have an effect on her, even if only subconscious, she's a liability. The right should never ever make such nonsense a factor, and I've seen way too many people praising her nomination based on "leftists can't claim she's racist, she has black kids, haha, their heads will explode". This IS bowing to their narrative, and it is enabling them to make US put people into power who bow to their narrative as well. There is basically not a shred of opposition to what they are forcing upon society with this bullshit.

That said, it remains to be seen if and how true this perception is. I might be wrong. By God, I hope I'm wrong. But people NEED to stop making leftist narratives a factor in their decisions.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
SaintPablo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seriously..::wtf. Lol

-3
Italians_Invented_2A -3 points ago +5 / -8

You think it's dumb because the communists successfully convinced you that having a racial identity or racial pride is bad.

Ask a black woman if she'd like to adopt white babies.

5
ThePowerOfPrayer 5 points ago +6 / -1

Christianity can also convince one to adopt children who are having a hard time finding adoptive parents, regardless of their skin color.

0
SWORDofLIBERTY 0 points ago +2 / -2

It's almost like the majority of christian nations are socialist or something.

-3
Italians_Invented_2A -3 points ago +1 / -4

Christianity? Oh, you mean that cucked religion that is headed by a full blown Marxist in the Vatican?

2
WillyP702 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

That is not enough for me to call her a Marxist. I'm black and I care about humanity as a whole. I've met good and bad in all races. So it would be insane for me to automatically feel comfortable with someone just because they match my skin color. .My identity comes from my personality and my actions not my skin color but that's just my world view. I think a majority of black people believe if they adopted a white kid then someone would call the police and claim that there has been a kidnapping.. 😂 I doubt it's because they wouldn't want to adopt a white kid but you know how nosey and insane some people can be.

0
Italians_Invented_2A 0 points ago +1 / -1

So be honest.

If you wanted to adopt a child, and you could choose, would you not want to have a child who looks like you?

0
SniffMyNeckSweetlyJo 0 points ago +2 / -2

Sounds like you blame race for everything wrong in your life.

This is America , this is a melting pot. Who gives a flying fuck if the kids are black.

Don’t you understand we are a melting pot?

Back in the day no one wanted Italians here, you are doing the exact same thing .

1
WillyP702 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amen!!

italians were discriminated against. but I believe the Irish had it worse though. They were really mistreated

0
Italians_Invented_2A 0 points ago +2 / -2

The ad hominem does not give any strength to your argument.

Perhaps you just woke up from a coma, but the most powerful political movement in America today is a black supremacist movement.

Biden has almost 90% support among blacks. The majority of blacks also support reparations, which is literally them wanting to take money away from white people.

You might not care about their race, but they care about yours.

1
BackQuack 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

The Constitution does not say that states can do whatever they want regarding poll watchers. This provision was specifically put in place to prevent fraud and when poll watchers are denied access (defying a court order) or are not allowed to be close to ballot counters (even when the election committee says otherwise), there should be no question that these violations are egregious. SCOTUS letting states get away with this basically means no poll watchers in the future which they cannot and will not permit. This is going to go to the state legislatures for choosing electors is my guess.

1
SniffMyNeckSweetlyJo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uh dude who cares she adopted black kids, what’s Marxist about that? Are you going to say blacks are inferior and some other racist shit?

We have plenty of black pedes here.

Also Hillary Clinton doesn’t oversee every single adoption in Haiti.

You have the worst logic ever man.

0
Italians_Invented_2A 0 points ago +2 / -2

Uh dude who cares she adopted black kids, what’s Marxist about that?

The "not seeing color" is a product of Marxist indoctrination. A normal parent would want his or her children to look like him or her.

Are you going to say blacks are inferior and some other racist shit?

No, I did not imply that at all.

Also Hillary Clinton doesn’t oversee every single adoption in Haiti.

International adoptions are sketchy on their own. In a third world country nothing happens without corruption. Corruption is endemic in shitholes.

So there is definitely the risk that they can blackmail ACB.

You have the worst logic ever man

Half this forum is convinced that Roberts flipped because they have some dirt on his international adoption.

1
SniffMyNeckSweetlyJo 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’ve got quite the string board setup in your closet huh?

0
Italians_Invented_2A 0 points ago +1 / -1

What's a string board setup?

-1
nikoniko -1 points ago +1 / -2

DEPORT

192
Infidel 192 points ago +197 / -5

He's already won. He doesn't even need to flip NV, AZ, GA, MI, WI, and PA through audits and recounts. The democrats were not prepared for two events; Ginsberg's death and Trump being the most popular candidate ever. The freezing of the vote count and robbery/deletion of votes was not their attempt to steal their election, that plan was dead in the water. Many of their votes up to that point were already fraudulent just to keep pace with Trump, they thought that'd be enough but by the end of the night they realized they'd need to make the fraud blatantly obvious to get Biden to win. They knew the fraud would inevitably be overturned. It wasn't a steal, it was the democrats flipping the table and beginning to gaslight the American people into causing chaos when Trump took the election back.

68
deadbugdale 68 points ago +69 / -1

Bingo Bango bongo

6
don_piledrive_hilary 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm from the Congo.

-Barry Hussein Soetoro

5
Johnfox13 5 points ago +6 / -1

Obungo

2
GreatestPresidentEvr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bish Bash Bosh

65
deleted 65 points ago +65 / -0
21
JoinTheDiscussion 21 points ago +21 / -0

Damn right! If it comes to it lead will silence chaos fast

6
PremiumPatriotPepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Every time!

4
hunterhiden 4 points ago +4 / -0

Amen

2
WillyP702 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be honest i agree. I know this one guy was claiming doing this way is taking the deepstate down without having to start World War3. I would be fine with World war 3 and be happy to fight it if it meant President Trump being declared the winner now instead of having to sit through this fake Biden shit show.

13
Omahusker 13 points ago +15 / -2

I predict the violence will be worse if Trump loses. Soros won't support the rioting as much if Trump wins because the election is over. Just a thought.

7
Lovepede 7 points ago +9 / -2

The loony left might just join the right and take out the swamp. They're not happy with the regular corrupt establishment administration Biden is putting together. He pretended to work with the extreme left and took Bernie's and AOC's eventual endorsement and voters, but now turn his back on them.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
EndHumanTrafficking2 3 points ago +3 / -0

President Trump won in a landslide. He won't lose.

The question isn't 'Did Pedo Joe cheat?'. The question is 'How much did Pedo Joe cheat?'

2
WillyP702 2 points ago +2 / -0

Facts!!!

3
CactusCactus 3 points ago +3 / -0

+1. I think they Dems are simply setting it up for as much organic chaos as possible, which we certainly shouldn't underestimate.

But there's nothing left for the elites to fund/fight for, if Trump serves a second term. They'll probably regroup and figure out a plan to reinvent themselves, for the future. Second time wasn't a charm, using the same strategy.

Both the parties will have undergone so much change, at the end of this. The question of who will be the Trump-ublican candidate in 2024 is equally as intriguing, as who will be the Dems'.

2
WillyP702 2 points ago +2 / -0

The real 46th President is running in 2024. President Don Trump jr!!!

12
BSnatch 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yep, its outlined in their "election integrity" plan. Bongino has been talking about this since this time last year. Fraud->litigation->civil unrest->claim we need to move on and declare Biden the winner. NOT GONNA HAPPEN FOLKS!

10
Dang 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is exactly what I think is going on as well.

77
shadypollster 77 points ago +80 / -3

Marked Not Safe for Libs!

17
deleted 17 points ago +23 / -6
4
InRevelation12now 4 points ago +7 / -3

I agree, but to be clear, I don't mean the 'traditional' liberal. A true traditional liberal would not try to steal an election - that would be against their values.

What's not okay are the lefty marxists, socialists, or communists or whatever the hell they are calling themselves. That is not okay. Send them to China. Give them a week or 2 to learn mandarin first, then off you go!

2
Wallypip3 2 points ago +4 / -2

True traditional liberals are stealing the election. They were always communists too.

1
DocHolliday1776 1 point ago +2 / -1

not in the true sense of "classical liberalism" which are basic western values.

-1
Wallypip3 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Nah. They were always commies

0
DocHolliday1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well I suppose call it whatever you like a failure is a failure

1
InRevelation12now 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't matter, true liberals are pretty much an extinct political species.

12
deleted 12 points ago +14 / -2
5
Doomguy1994 5 points ago +6 / -1

There's a good number of helicopters we could use: The CH-47 Chinook, the CH-53 Stallion, The MV-22 Osprey, and if you want to go big or go home, the Mil Mi-26.

7
Italians_Invented_2A 7 points ago +7 / -0

the Mil Mi-26

Please let's buy some of these from Russia and leave the red star on them as we take the commies for a ride

6
GastonP1000 6 points ago +6 / -0

Perfect! You could fit 90 people in one, or 30 Chris Christies.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Doomguy1994 2 points ago +2 / -0

"You want free healthcare? Here's a free flight to North Korea!"

Commie gets launched.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
5
Doomguy1994 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's a meme about Pinochet killing commies in Chile by throwing them out of helicopters.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
0
-7
deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
3
shadypollster 3 points ago +4 / -1

Username checks out.

3
rubberkidney 3 points ago +3 / -0

idk man cost per kg for launching shit directly into space is way down. maybe we shouldnt risk having their commyonic matter infecting the planet at all.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
McFatty7 2 points ago +2 / -0

Top-right is how the Left sees President Trump everyday and in their dreams nightmares lol

-7
deleted -7 points ago +2 / -9
7
shadypollster 7 points ago +7 / -0

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE COPE TROLL IS COOOOOOOPING REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

67
deleted 67 points ago +71 / -4
27
Bgjhgub 27 points ago +27 / -0

Here's hoping the worst we have to go through is another pussy hat march

3
deleted 3 points ago +8 / -5
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
humble_kekistani 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t want to shoot anyone

Then I'm not sure you're paying close enough attention, because the democrat controlled Southern District of New York let the most prolific child rapist of our time slip through the cracks before he could testify

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Wallypip3 1 point ago +4 / -3

Pussy. You don't deserve freedom. You deserve social credit score dystopia.

1
Hail_Milo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same, but I made sure I can bounce a tennis ball around with my AK47 iron sights at 100 feet still.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Dirtbuggy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Get on the Minecraft server and join in.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
softhack 1 point ago +1 / -0

They've even got extra backup coming home.

62
deleted 62 points ago +65 / -3
23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
16
deleted 16 points ago +18 / -2
6
PremiumPatriotPepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

We're living in the sequel.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
Hamiltonfai 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Art of the Steal

58
Dilaudid 58 points ago +60 / -2

Don't forget Alito.

47
deleted 47 points ago +47 / -0
9
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 9 points ago +9 / -0

Then should be a slam dunk?

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
2
Chuckythepirate 2 points ago +2 / -0

Always a good idea.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
42
RighttheWrong 42 points ago +54 / -12

So...am I the only person that frequents this website who is not 100% certain that this is going to play out the way we all want it to?

30
The_Spicy_Memes_Chef 30 points ago +38 / -8

Nope, I’m right there with you.

My thinking is this...the deep state probably already has agents threatening and intimidating the judges and their families to do their bidding.

Thats exactly what the Mexican drug cartel does to judges and it works 100% of the time

-4
Doomguy1994 -4 points ago +5 / -9

I myself won't be surprised if one of the judges suffer an "untimely death." It'll be some sort of wacky accident that won't hold up under scrutiny, but the media will brainwash the public into thinking it was just an unfortunate event.

4
ThePowerOfPrayer 4 points ago +5 / -1

Shot in the back of the head? Another Covid-19 death, Johnson.

9
D0NNIE_DARK0 9 points ago +10 / -1

Or dead in bed with a pillow over your head at a ranch in West Texas...oh wait

1
Hail_Milo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aaaah yes the old Gary Webb.

14
MuadDon 14 points ago +15 / -1

There's a lot of hubris here in regards to SCOTUS (and the military). I don't think anyone doubts what SCOTUS should do, more about what they will do. The weight of the global elite is on 9 people.

11
deleted 11 points ago +19 / -8
12
RighttheWrong 12 points ago +14 / -2

Unfortunately, I don’t see this worldwide fraud being overturned using the US “legal system.” I don’t want this to happen, but long-sustained physical resistance is probably going to be the only way. My hope is that Trump refuses to leave the White House, absolutely refuses, and then we will have to see how this all works out. I am not advocating for an internal, national war, but the courts are not conservative’s allies.

10
Doomguy1994 10 points ago +12 / -2

What really sucks is when you bring up these very valid concerns, you get told to "fuck off DoOmER!" It creates an echo chamber.

6
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 6 points ago +8 / -2

It’s so fucking annoying.

I’ve been told to kill my self and called a cuck dOOMER for simply showing concern lol.

Yet these losers who are all “MUH dOoMeR!” Can never answer any of your questions or slight concerns. Never.

-2
tinkesquire -2 points ago +4 / -6

What do you concerns do for the board? Hurt morale only, that's why you get called a doomer.

8
Doomguy1994 8 points ago +10 / -2

I don't want to hurt morale. I just don't want people to become complacent.

4
tinkesquire 4 points ago +4 / -0

Most people can't really do much here but cheerlead and boost the morale of the wavering black pillers.

5
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 5 points ago +6 / -1

Wrong. It’s not like that.

It’s when other American loving trump supporters ask questions or act concerned about all that’s going on. When a dialogue and just a dissuasion is attempting to take place.

Are you saying we all should just be like “everything is going to work out no matter what and Trump will be inaugurated!”

We can’t be concerned about a color revolution and coup being attempted? Or discuss the fact that the courts are very well compromised?

I’ll ask you respectfully- truly. How specifically do you see all of this playing out in the next few weeks and how do you see trump officially starting his 2nd term?

2
RighttheWrong 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for asking that oh so obvious question.

6
Trumpette1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yep. It’s really gonna come down to Trump invoking the Insurrection Act. Very few real men/women/Patriots left.

We are on our own and all we got basically is our President who is on our side. I fucking hate saying this but it’s what I believe

-13
Italians_Invented_2A -13 points ago +5 / -18

She adopted foreign black children.

She might be a Marxist and vote against us just because Kamala is black and she feels the White House needs more diversity.

4
Hardcouer 4 points ago +4 / -0

She adopted them after having 5 of her own and being a church leader and a judge. How many left wing career women have 5 kids?

-8
deleted -8 points ago +5 / -13
5
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 5 points ago +7 / -2

You sound incredibly ignorant.

3
deleted 3 points ago +7 / -4
3
Trumpette1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not necessarily. Isn’t she a devout Catholic?

I too am a Catholic and there’s this serious thing called “corporal works of mercy”. If she is not a fake Catholic then she takes this obligation of the faith very seriously. Chill out pedes

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
1
don_piledrive_hilary 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think she's one of the people who does that shit, but actually means it. Like, does it so she can be a parent to children in need, to raise them to be great people. Not just lefty virtue points.

0
Italians_Invented_2A 0 points ago +1 / -1

And you sound like a libtard. What exactly does u/CasualJogger ignore?

If you have a different opinion that must mean you're not educated is the war cry of the Marxists

-2
Doomguy1994 -2 points ago +2 / -4

He probably thought that the Dems wouldn't be able to accuse ACB of being racist.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +5 / -7
5
Light_HIV_Effect 5 points ago +7 / -2

How to get the toothpaste back in the tube? One would hope all these mail in's get disqualified, but I would be shocked if they take that drastic an action.

4
LainDietrich 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nope.

27
ChinaVirusBigly 27 points ago +29 / -2

I know fake news has lied and spread propaganda and vicious hate speech all the past 4 years so I know I shouldn't be surprised, but I'm actually a little shocked at how badly they've crossed the line now

Fake News is basically guaranteeing mass riots once we win again, normies minds will shatter more than 2016 they are trying to say OUR side is staging a coup, even non antifa liberals just regular retards will think they should protest and get violent. We have a civil war on our hands win or lose, this is going to get insane.

The only way there's no violence and uproar is if Trump concedes and tells us to stand down, which we all know 100% will not happen. If we lose and he calls upon us shit is going down. Once we win though the other side will go insane and all get checked into mental institutions due to this fake news propaganda

17
CJBarnacle 17 points ago +21 / -4

They've already lit the fuse that Trump is disenfranchising black voters by challenging this fraudulent election. Expect a massive chimp out if he wins.

4
loverat 4 points ago +5 / -1

I wish I could upvote you twice for the phrase "chimp out".

1
Wallypip3 1 point ago +1 / -0

...have you never heard that before?

2
Sv215 2 points ago +2 / -0

If????

1
Dirtbuggy 1 point ago +2 / -1

Very big chimp out incoming no doubt.

7
OVERMENSCH 7 points ago +7 / -0

But consider that Trump's untethered response to the riots is going to set a precedent. And we get to watch it happen.

6
Italians_Invented_2A 6 points ago +6 / -0

No, no. If Trump wins, they won't do shit.

Starting a civil war would give us the opportunity to wipe out communism once and for all.

I sometimes feel that civil war is the only scenario where MAGA wins.

5
JoinTheDiscussion 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not if MSM coup and treason participants are also sent to Gitmo, then lefties might come around

3
Bramage 3 points ago +3 / -0

And this where POTUS declares insurrection and crushes the Left with the military, hence the recent change of SECDEF and elevating SPECOPS to under his control. MSM will have to be held to account at that point.

20
DanCreek 20 points ago +21 / -1

I love how Clarence is the most intense, the dude has been waiting for almost 30 years for this moment

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
19
deleted 19 points ago +20 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
17
Aeropro 17 points ago +18 / -1

Where's John Roberts? /s

22
Rreidy8286 22 points ago +24 / -2

Taking over payments of a certain persons island.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
15
The_Mighty_Don 15 points ago +16 / -1

Mourning ginsberg

11
HillarysStrapOn 11 points ago +11 / -0

Hiding under his desk

12
yellow_iron 12 points ago +12 / -0

He's under a desk alright, but it ain't his.

1
Wallypip3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perhaps not being blackmailed any more. Inversely, might be being blackmailed by the good guys now.

15
Stoya9186 15 points ago +15 / -0

Something Rudy said recently really resonated with me: "Going forward, the national security implications of this are going to move to the forefront."

This leads me to believe the legal maneuvering is just a smokescreen. The SOCCOM reshuffling and cutting Haspell and Wray out of the loop effectively (if that's actually happened) seems much more telling.

I accept that there's the possibility of some confirmation bias or wishful thinking here, but as of Friday's press conference, I got the sense that Powell and Guiliani were very much on the same page about the external threats at play here.

If all of the Trump campaign eggs were in the SCOTUS basket, I'd expect there would be a much more strident push for time. There isn't.

To my mind, this can only mean one of two things: Trump has already won, and the rest of the world is just waiting to learn how so it can catch up, or this is all a petulant display of sore losership. Until I receive evidence to the contrary (or arrive at Jan 20 without solid evidence for the former) my money is on Trump already having won.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Stoya9186 2 points ago +2 / -0

That doesn't make sense at all for me. IF that is true, the SCOTUS is his last recourse. Why would time not be of the essence here? He'd be lashing out at any delay to a SCOTUS hearing.

3
Italians_Invented_2A 3 points ago +3 / -0

First of all, we don't know if Trump is losing his shit right now. Clearly it's best for him to appear calm.

Second, Trump doesn't have the power to speed up or influence the SCOTUS process. "Lashing out" would not help.

Thirdly, I pray that Trump has a plan B in case SCOTUS doesn't go his way. And this plan B should be to use the military to remain in power, assuming the military is loyal to him.

5
RighttheWrong 5 points ago +5 / -0

Your third point is my sincere hope as well. I am praying that he refuses this crap and deploys the military. Yes, this could be seen as the act of a dictator and yes, I would be sickened if the roles were reversed. However, this is beyond obvious what took place. He has already survived numerous coups. It is his turn to use the full force of the government/ military upon these actual domestic enemies.

4
Stoya9186 4 points ago +4 / -0

Remaining in power via military fiat would be the end of the Republic.

I guess allowing Biden to ascend to the presidency via fraud and utter failure of the Constitutional checks and balances to prevent would be the same.

Grim days.

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, Trump remaining in power would save the Republic because the founding principles would be maintained.

Harris president means that the Republic is transformed into a communist country where white people are going to be persecuted in the name of "equality".

It's two completely different outcomes

14
TheyEatTheirOwnLies 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'm feeling second-hand fear for liberals here.

14
MajorTom 14 points ago +15 / -1

The liberals in my household will seethe hard. Will be a glorious sight to behold.

Nothin personal kid.

4
Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +5 / -1

How the hell does one live with libtards?

This pede is behind enemy lines

6
MajorTom 6 points ago +7 / -1

They're my family. They know my political affiliation and they surprisingly dont care. Thats all im gonna say, dont feel like doxxing my self.

14
H_Guderian 14 points ago +15 / -1

I hope it does get up to them soon and they can save the Republic. After the ballot box and the jury box, what comes next?

16
uzi5v2 16 points ago +16 / -0

Ammo box.

0
RANDOR0423 0 points ago +1 / -1

Soap box?

1
HunterBidenCokeMirro 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is the first box.

13
CT_MAGA 13 points ago +13 / -0

I've been thinking about this. The meme cannons need to be heavily manned. We need shitposting like never before seen. I will create a new reddit account. Hopefully my twitter ban isn't perm. I stay away from Facebook, never liked it from the beginning. Make them cry! Our roads will be snow free this winter pedes.

13
Jjfoshoyo 13 points ago +15 / -2

When though? I’ve been seeing the word “soon” for weeks

14
OVERMENSCH 14 points ago +14 / -0

"Weeks" is a pretty short timeframe in the context of national-scale litigation

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
1
hisnamewasjeff 1 point ago +2 / -1

If we're being honest, SCOTUS comes to play around January...probably

3
CommieCucker 3 points ago +3 / -0

And that's too late.

1
Eric-CIA-ramella 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah no shit, why the fuck do people keep spamming this meme when it's not even on track?

11
Omahusker 11 points ago +11 / -0

We aren't going to lose. Be confident. Be full of hope. Be ready to win.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
Strike_Eagle784 9 points ago +9 / -0

DUDES, THE HIGH ENERGY IS BEGINNING TO FLOW IN ME!

8
Serioush 8 points ago +8 / -0

This should not be about "Having enough justices on your side"

If there is fraud, or just improper elections it should be brought to light.

If there is not, that should be cleared up.

It's fucked up that courts would be tribal.

8
OrngeManBad 8 points ago +8 / -0

SCOTUS is going to save the USA from the commies

8
GoldwaterVoter 8 points ago +9 / -1

Thomas: Revenge is a dish best served cold. Freezing cold.

8
Ikikaera 8 points ago +8 / -0

2016 was already wild, once this shit is over and done with the inevitable meltdown will quite literally flood the entire world.
I can't wait.

7
Anticen 7 points ago +9 / -2

I pray this doesn't end with a black pill.

7
1776ThereIsaidIt 7 points ago +9 / -2

Kavanaugh is not a given. Also one may cuck out because nominated by Trump probably.

12
CJBarnacle 12 points ago +12 / -0

If Kavanaugh sides with the people who tried to destroy him, then we might as well consider him a liberal judge.

9
MuadDon 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's not about who is liberal or conservative. It's about who is with the laws of our land and who is with the the elite oligarchy that controls our country and other western nations.

6
TheRoyalRob 6 points ago +6 / -0

I mean, if they follow law, the constitution and precedent set in 2000, it's clear cut.

But I guess we will see, the first ruling out of them I believe will tell us everything we need to know.

5
SixteenBeatsAOne 5 points ago +5 / -0

Add Alito and Gorsuch. That is the five we need. Chief Justice Roberts is a closeted Never-Trumper. You just know that Justice Thomas is going to eat up this opportunity to hammer down on Dementia Joe.

1
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 1 point ago +1 / -0

How exactly is Justice Thomas going to “hammer down” on Biden? What do you mean by that exactly?

4
SixteenBeatsAOne 4 points ago +4 / -0

In a few weeks, SCOTUS will rule for Pres. Trump's legal team. And by doing so, Justice Thomas will hammer down his vote for Pres. Trump, giving him a Second Term. And with that same vote, it'll send Dementia Joe back to his Wilmington basement.

1
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay. Do you mind to elaborate? When you say “SCOTUS will rule for Pres” what do you mean? Rule what for Trump? Thomas will “hammer down js coge for Trump giving him a 2nd term”. What do you mean by that? The Justices aren’t able to just pick either trump or Biden to be president.

Can you explain what you mean?

1
SixteenBeatsAOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have asked the same question of other participants to this post. So here is my take. SCOTUS will rule to negate the hundreds of thousands of votes that mysteriously were counted in the early morning of November 4th -- based on the the two facts that there was (1)no corresponding signature envelope for any of these Biden votes and (2)the impossible math associated with these 'found' votes. I will even be more specific and go so far as to forecast that the negated votes will occur in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan and Pennsylvania -- leading to a President Trump Second Term.

-1
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz -1 points ago +1 / -2

So the SCOTUS is literally going to overturn the “results” and certifications in all those states thus flipping them all to Trump?

5
obviouslytom 5 points ago +5 / -0

You better hope that they come thru and that they haven't been compromised by anyone on the left with threats to them or their families. You can bet that they are already trying to do it

1
Bramage 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's long time the Left was rounded and either interned or shot over open pits, Im thoroughly sick of their commie GARBAGE, they cannot be reasoned with.

5
AshenDemon 5 points ago +5 / -0

We shouldn't need the Supreme Court. The REPUBLICAN State Assembly members need to grow a spine in all of these battleground states and demand a recount or refuse to certify the election. It's that simple. Otherwise there will be blood on the streets and in the neighborhoods and it will be on their hands, it's THAT bad at this point!

3
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Michigan just certified.

3
Eric-CIA-ramella 3 points ago +3 / -0

I really find it mind boggling that pedes would legitimately think Republican legislatures in 5+ states would just NOT certify votes because of fraud, miscounted ballots, more votes than voters, or the best "they want Trump to win" etc. The GOP are absolute pussies and you're borderline retarded if you think Republicans on a local state level would just throw a wrench in the machine and not certify votes, regardless of whether or not 10 or 10 million are fraudulent. Even the most based of politicians know they only make it another term if you have a pool of voters who aren't fucking pissed at you and want to vote for you. Throwing out states votes in an election like that by not certifying instantly pisses off half that pool, if not more. They simply will not ever take that risk, especially if they can pacify and concede and maybe get it next time.

It is not something to put all your memes and hope on, not by a long shot. I know a lot of pedes here think there is a mass voice of revolution in the air and millions of people do wan to see Trump stay - but the other 110 million apathetic people in this country could literally care less. You need half of them on board and as amped as your movement in order for anything "Rubicon" like to happen.

5
trockr 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not gonna lie, while I’m extremely pumped for this, I’m legit worried that multiple people I know will kill themselves. I’m not really sure how to prepare them for what’s about to happen.

2
CactusCactus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same here.

At absolute best, I'm worried that people will try to kill me/other trump supporters.

5
disgruntled_patriot 5 points ago +7 / -2

I can't wait to see them dangling at the ends of ropes.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
0
disgruntled_patriot 0 points ago +1 / -1

If you really want something done. Do it yourself.

1
drdespinz 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't have a 2A tool or a plan, membership or anything except machoman promises that read like the back of a t-shirt. I'm just done. There are like a hundred keyboard warriors I see every day vowing to defend the country but always deferring to someone else to do it first. If there are still court cases and people dealing with the legal shit then all this talk about a diy reckoning is cringe as hell. Doomers like you went real quiet when Hillary got off and Obama got off, so if Trump lets Biden get inaugurated no reason to expect you'd suddenly log off and get up in arms

1
disgruntled_patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL Doomers like me. You're a funny thing. Can you at least TRY to hide the fact that you're a shill?

Hey, fwiw chum, I'm with you on the keyboard warrior thing and everyone just sitting around with their thumbs up their butts waiting for someone else to do their dirty work for them.

I, myself, often wonder if any one of us really would finally get up off our asses and do what must be done if it finally came to that.

I've been surprised and disappointed before. So I guess we'll wait and see.

You, on the other hand, need to log off before you get your shill ass deported.

1
drdespinz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plenty of people would get up off their asses. We have sunday gun day, and statements from militia and veterans as proof of that saying they would defend in a heartbeat if the law broke down. So you'd be surprised. But only keyboard warriors bark about it. So yea thats dooming, because relenting to a fight means all decorum and law has been lost. So you are either overly eager to fight, or enjoy barking about it more than doing about it.

5
TheCat 5 points ago +7 / -2

It's kind of disappointing that Chris Christie called Trump's legal team an "embarrassment" and says he should just cede the election. I really hope this supposed "Kraken" is not just hype. i would rather have Trump lose fairly and fix the election system so this never happens again. If the most powerful country in the world cannot have a rock solid election process then there's no hope.

7
JoinTheDiscussion 7 points ago +7 / -0

There is no FIXING it if Trump loses.. Its is the exact reasonbDems have had any power at all for well over a decade

4
Eric-CIA-ramella 4 points ago +4 / -0

and fix the election system so this never happens again

How do I say this simply.

Even IF Trump wins and "fixes" anything with the voting system, the pure existence of Democrats will guarantee that such a thing WILL happen again. If you haven't figured it out by now, this country is at a cross roads after 60 years where the only way forward is REAL PHYSICAL CONFRONTATION. I'm not even trying to glow but I am anyways because this is reality and truth - nothing comes out of this different or better unless the opposition is dealt with. For years the Left has known and acted on this and only now are people on the Right starting to realize the end has come.

4
Bramage 4 points ago +5 / -1

Fucking deep state swamp dweller revealing his true colors.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 4 points ago +4 / -0

"You didn't think I'd let you steal the election, did you, Joe?"

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Biden is out here selecting cabinet members.

3
Bramage 3 points ago +3 / -0

What a delusional LOSER.

4
massivehairycleaner 4 points ago +4 / -0

I see there are exactly 18 lurking cucks downvoting everything they see.

4
SoldierofKek 4 points ago +5 / -1

I really hope Barnes is wrong about Barrett. He's not a fan. It hinges on her. She did fuck us. She could have prevented all the covid bs rules in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia. Instead she sat it out. If she doesn't rule correctly that's fucking unforgivable.

4
Duckanddodge 4 points ago +4 / -0

BIG MAGA ENERGY

4
Flammenwerfer 4 points ago +5 / -1

Trump is not using enough of his power. He needs to use 100% of his power to win.

1
weallscreamforMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like AG power

4
Trumpmaga4eva 4 points ago +6 / -2

I am not convinced. I think Scotus are a bunch of pussies and will end up bitching out

4
TheRoyalRob 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep. The only thing is the democrats did screw these people over.... and it's very hard for me to imagine a world where you would vote in favor of people you know are going to make your jobs meaningless by packing the court.

3
Eric-CIA-ramella 3 points ago +3 / -0

and it's very hard for me to imagine a world where you would vote in favor of people you know are going to make your jobs meaningless by packing the court

The world you are referring to is the world of conservatives. I'm not being edgy, it just really is exactly that. I've never seen any political force in this country concede and capitulate as often as conservatives or Republicans for that matter either.

I can help you imagine that world, which is current reality basically:

Conservatives are cursed buy morals, ethics, and overall selflessness. Amy is as obviously stated very Catholic, so right away one of the core tenets of Christianity is turning the other cheek to your enemy. While we seek to take the high road and keep our honor and dignity, Eric Holder already laid it out simply years ago that the Democrats "take the low road, and kick em while they're down". Your dignity means nothing to your enemy, and they will easily take the opportunity to kill you should weakness present itself.

So in turn do not be surprised when Alito, Kavanaugh, Barret, Alito, and Roberts either dismiss the case or rule against Trump - if in their legal education the Constitution requires them to do so, they'll do it, EVEN IF by all means it is the wrong move for America and obviously fraudulent, they will adhere to their appointed duty instead of catering to their personal vendettas against years of abuse from Democrats. It is, again, turning the other cheek for the "greater good" of the nation.

Now conversely if they somehow DO fulfill the meme and tell the Democrats to go fuck themselves, it will be the greatest kek heard 'round the world. There's no problem in hoping for that - but do not delude yourself into finding the obvious hard to image.

2
TheRoyalRob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, well I've already made peace with the swamp swamping... Trump always said they want to come after you, I'm just in the way, well I moved my ass over to South Korea in 2019 because I knew how bad it was going to get. I feel like Japan and Korea will be one of the last places to fall to globalism and the massive movement of refugees. The problem with being over here is once the USA falls, then China has free reign to do whatever they want, I'm pretty positive the Korean government will cuck out, Japan will stand strong, but considering we have kept their military in check since ww2 China will over take them easily with out America backing them up.

My ONLY hope with a DT loss to the swamp is, the swamp has basically been in control for my whole life, I've lived under the swamp more then not, so my guess is we will just go back to a slow burn of eroding away rights and anything too drastic will get shut down by the courts, before they pack them.

And as much as I know it's the wrong thing to do, I'm just going to go back to were I was in 2015, not planning on voting and black pilled on all things government, because ultimately it doesn't matter... republicans are the reason we are in this mess, maybe once they start coming after people's guns, then they will wake up, but by then it will mostly be too late.

idk, I don't have to care, at least until N. Korea starts firing missiles over my head again.

2
Eric-CIA-ramella 2 points ago +2 / -0

Korea culture is nice and far better than the ghetto shit world Dems have created in American cities, but they won't be far behind in degeneracy unfortunately. That and South Korea is already pretty cucked to leftists motives anyways, but good for you. My only hope here if the Dems and swamp manage to forcibly keep the U.S. from balkanizing or splitting will be to go to the most redneck conservative part of Canada possible.

I'd love nothing more than to surround myself with like minded people in the woods with family and live a life of cold struggle and physical labor with my morals keeping me warm. The rest of the world can go to hell.

1
don_piledrive_hilary 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wouldn't the constitution favor Trump in these cases anyways?

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
neosin 3 points ago +3 / -0

I will need a bigger bucket to capture all the tears

3
TrumpsBestFriend 3 points ago +4 / -1

If Biden tries to enter January as president, ARE YOU READY FOR CIVIL WAR

-2
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz -2 points ago +1 / -3

This sounds larpy

3
Pepeboy1 3 points ago +3 / -0

I can't wait for something...we need to unite, patriots, organize and plan...don't wait until it's too late

3
thatsnotminesir 3 points ago +4 / -1

I wouldn't be surprised if we saw a 6 - 3. Roberts is certainly a turn coat, you usually only shows those colors if his vote flips the decision.

If he can't stop it, I would not be surprised if he jumped over to the winning side. Just like Aesop's bat. He'll never be able to win over trust again, But don't put it past him to pretend to care about the rule of law If he can't stop the right decision.

3
aqua27 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't count your chickens before they are hatched I doubt any of them have the balls to do the right thing

-2
tinkesquire -2 points ago +1 / -3

DOOM!

3
tr3k 3 points ago +3 / -0

No love for Neil Gorsuch?

2
HKFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

"It's been a long time, Joe"

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
1
Muh_Wailing_MXbabies 1 point ago +2 / -1

What’s your favourite cock flavour?

im guessing you’ll vote for your moms meat 👍

Bye 😘

-9
deleted -9 points ago +9 / -18
2
errydaktal 2 points ago +2 / -0

You idiot. It's not about trump. It's about the hard evidence of the fraud vs whether they've been bribed or not. The fraud absolutely happened go look at Edward Solomon's videos

2
JohnMcCainsTumors 2 points ago +3 / -1

Ya any day now