I thought they took it back and signed an affidavit saying they were bullied and threated into signing it...which in a court of law no signature signed under threat or duress would hold up. And I understand that libtards are trying to say..oh no you already signed it so no taking back...well if they are saying no changing your mind then why wouldn't their first choice of 'not certifying' hold up. you could make the same argument stating oh no libs our first choice was not to certify so no taking it back.
I thought they took it back and signed an affidavit saying they were bullied and threated into signing it...which in a court of law no signature signed under threat or duress would hold up. And I understand that libtards are trying to say..oh no you already signed it so no taking back...well if they are saying no changing your mind then why wouldn't their first choice of 'not certifying' hold up. you could make the same argument stating oh no libs our first choice was not to certify so no taking it back.