6822
Comments (797)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
Burrito_Bandito 9 points ago +10 / -1

you are also wrong and Alito has already shown SCOTUS intentions.

The case going to SCOTUS from PA will invalidate all ballots received after 8pm election night and even Dershowitz thinks its a shoe-in.

The other states have similar issues.

If SCOTUS rules that these rules imposed by these states were unconstitutional (they were) then you are suggesting that these legislatures will knowingly certify ballots deemed ILLEGAL by SCOTUS. i dont think so.

3
iamherefortheluls 3 points ago +3 / -0

i've read Alito's court orders and I also watched his speech to that judicial society. I am 99.999% sure he will side with Trump.

Can't help but notice though that he seems to be the only SCOTUS judge that opened his mouth on the matter over last month.

But you are right, one thing we have going for us that's very different from 2000 is that we are likely to get a SCOTUS ruling before legislature certifies the state votes. That really does make this upcoming case a whole other ball game in terms of ramifications.

Hope endures.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Stukov 2 points ago +2 / -0

It isn't siding with Trump though, it is siding with the law, the Constitution, and the god damn Republic.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +3 / -9