53
Comments (7)
sorted by:
4
Saltflake 4 points ago +4 / -0

Very good article. Thanks for posting that. I think there a lot of people on this site who are realists that are too quickly labeled as doomers. They understand the election was subject to massive, in your face, fraud. They know the Virus and in particular, the response to it, is unconstitutional. They know Biden himself is corrupt beyond compare and his ties to the CCP would destroy the USA. They know local, state and federal politicians are also criminally corrupt and clearly acting against the will of 73 million people who legally voted for Trump. They have already seen the corruption from the lower courts in their decisions against Trump and the Constitution. They have no reason to expect any integrity from the SCOTUS and realize that, due to time constraints, the people are quickly losing the luxury of waiting for the SCOTUS to "do the right thing" and uphold the will of the people. I have often noted that when someone posts something on this site that calls into question the probability of legal success, they are called a Doomer and told to "hold the line". I understand the demoralizing effect of negativity but keep in mind that a lack of faith in the system, at this point, is not necessarily Dooming it is a reasonable and logical response to over four years of corruption and viloence from the Left. Some of those people who are fed up of "holding the line", like the Oath Keepers and Militias, are not interested in backing off. Instead, as I suspect, they are looking for confirmation from others that this is the time to stop holding the line and instead to be pushing the line forward. They realize that waiting for an obviously broken system to finally decide to follow the law is lunacy and could put everyone in a position where it will be too late to take meaningful action against the fraud. If there are people here that would be willing to support President trump in the event that he invokes the Insurrection Act, he needs to know about that support. I think this a valid use for a forum like this.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
NuclearRocks1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pray

-1
Mrs_Fonebone -1 points ago +1 / -2

There were rumors, but never verified, that to avoid crossing the Rubicon, as it were, he would have allowed Dems to "surrender" instead--admit it, face the punishment, which would not be so serious as it will be when he has to demolish them as they resist. He prefers negotiations, but they know their very lives are at stake so yeah, they'll dig in their corrupt heels.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Saltflake 3 points ago +3 / -0

I found this encouraging: Catherine Herridge also published the letter from the GSA to the Biden Campaign which states, for the record, that the funds were released because of credible threats to her life, the lives of her family and even their pets. The letter also states that the GSA does not select or approve the next president and that the release of limited funds is by no way an endorsement of Biden for the next president. She stated that only the legal process laid out in the Constitution can determine who the next president will be.

2
Dogwhistle1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seem weak, strike with fury!