46
Comments (38)
sorted by:
5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
5
jason73ug 5 points ago +6 / -1

the DOJ wouldnt seize it if he told them to

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
jason73ug 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeah well fuck dude how has that worked out so far. we are on attorney general number 2 and still nothing has happened from the 2016 election .

2
Dilis 2 points ago +3 / -1

This all has to go through legal processes, i.e., courts. There's an undercurrent, too, about which we need to be patient -- and SUPPORTIVE.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Anon331717 1 point ago +3 / -2

Yes. He isn't the DOJ.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
Anon331717 1 point ago +2 / -1

How do you know he hadn’t done shit? Can you show us your entitlement credentials?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Anon331717 1 point ago +2 / -1

How do you know they haven’t been? Do you think that the msm is going to tell you? Come on man...

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
Anon331717 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can’t argue with that. Problem is, POTUS seems to have had zero non swamp choices for an AG during his presidency. He is literally at the mercy of swamp lawmakers.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Cavemantrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can Spy .Frame Slander Impeach Leak His Taxes Send Poison Attacks His Supporter Throw His Staff in Prison And Bankrupted Them. . lie About Gas Attacks To Get Into War. Say He Did His Daughter say He Dont Believe In GOD. Tear up His Speeches Call him A Fake A Fraud Side with China Against 🇺🇸 Help Spread A Fake Flu Fix The Numbers . Blame him For the Dead. Sue Him Boycott his Buildings . shoot Up His Hotels Fly Plane into His Rallies. air Space . Hold Up Checks to 🇺🇸 Hold Up Other Medical cures . Other Than The Shot . And then Hold the Shot Up . as he Fights his Own Republican Party.

And Rigg A election .... As His DOJ/FBI does Nothing.

1
Isaiah53 1 point ago +2 / -1

If they are prematurely destroyed, and most states, even screamingly corrupt NY, require that all ballots/envelopes be held for a minimum of 90 days.

If they are destroyed, they cannot be counted as part of the voter tallies.

The dems are burning everything right now, prefering to lose by lack of voter evidence, rather than being jailed for proof of voting fraud.

I think Trump is letting them burn it down at a local level, knowing that will force a win for him, while it also allows him to go after ALL the international and domestic conspirators for digitally election rigging, which is an act of war for foreigners and treason for US participants.

Edit: Getting downvoted for citing state laws? And how Trump will force his win in court?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Isaiah53 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is state law, in each of the disputed swing states.

All Trump has to do in SCOTUS is to hold each state to their own laws.

That's it.

Then he wins.

He doesn't have to do anything else.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Isaiah53 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what the Constitution is for.

Someone has power over you only when YOU allow it. Stand up or die on your knees as a coward.

0
Michael032817 0 points ago +1 / -1

States rights. Not federal property. They control the vote so the evidence is theirs and by law cannot destroy it in turn he cannot seize it. It’s just something the federal government doesn’t do. We can only fight the case on a constitutional basis the way Giuliani is handling it. Besides that it’s up to the states to handle the rest. This is why federal elections and local... I believe should be separated. For now though it’s handled by the states.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Steven4385 0 points ago +1 / -1

Separation of Powers. It's in the Constitution. States autonomy

2
Michael032817 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny how both of us explain the answer of the states being the ones controlling the vote and we both get downvoted.

1
Steven4385 1 point ago +1 / -0

some touchy people on here. The truth is the truth.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Steven4385 1 point ago +1 / -0

There would have to be an investigation, warrants. Barr? Wray? Where are you? States are subject to their state laws as far as elections, the Federal Government can't just start seizing STATE property (Ballots etc.)

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3