Ah, his wording implied he had seen the tape.. as in it was someone else's, and he wanted to see what they would provide, and bait them into destroying it....
Bro did he do this for Nick though? I didn't follow his Twitter then. It makes me nervous. Like, bro, my dick can only get so hard thinking about what he's going to do to them in court
He may have seen it, but has subpoenaed the footage so he can use in court. I would be surprised if he was tweeting without seeing it first. He is the guy that whipped the CIA after all.
I totally agree. Problem is, he’s super professional and does everything by the book and according to the law. That’s how he saved Richard Jewel and handed the CIA their evil corrupt ass.
Unless there are clearly people doing some fraud like bubbling in blank ballots, then it would be better to hold off.
You take it, id people in the tape, then question them without them seeing the tape. If they see what's on tape ahead of time, they can try to make up excuses for what can be seen on the tape. But ask them what they were doing on that day and time and it is much harder to lie when they don't know what you know.
He has subpoenaed the surveillance video of State Farm Arena.
I wonder if the Dems will call in Hillary to smash the devices that hold the video data, because it's totally okay for her to deliberately destroy up to 33,000 files under federal subpoena, that's already been established, "no reasonable prosecutor would file charges"!
He has subpoenaed the surveillance video of State Farm Arena. In US District Court. (Feds)
Ah, his wording implied he had seen the tape.. as in it was someone else's, and he wanted to see what they would provide, and bait them into destroying it....
Aka veritas style...he’s beginning to shitpost like GEOTUS.
Bro did he do this for Nick though? I didn't follow his Twitter then. It makes me nervous. Like, bro, my dick can only get so hard thinking about what he's going to do to them in court
They're going to review thousands of hours of video footage in 2-3 weeks?
Better crowd source. I'll volunteer!
Crowd source before they get crowd strike involved.
He may have seen it, but has subpoenaed the footage so he can use in court. I would be surprised if he was tweeting without seeing it first. He is the guy that whipped the CIA after all.
If he had the ability to see it, he should have instantly leaked it online
Donald Trump - Art of The Deal
https://youtu.be/5WvfZuuaUkE
This can not be won in the courts until it is won in the court of public opinion.
These people should be leaking EVERYTHING.
There's no jury pool to tamper, these cases are going before judges.
I totally agree. Problem is, he’s super professional and does everything by the book and according to the law. That’s how he saved Richard Jewel and handed the CIA their evil corrupt ass.
well hopefully he has a copy in case they delete it
No. You let them all certify first, so they're knowingly complicit in election fraud. Then you drop the hammer, and roll them over on each other.
those cowards who certified the election result will claim plausible deniability. it works all the time to save your ass!
This is what doomers need to read, reread, and then read again
Unless there are clearly people doing some fraud like bubbling in blank ballots, then it would be better to hold off.
You take it, id people in the tape, then question them without them seeing the tape. If they see what's on tape ahead of time, they can try to make up excuses for what can be seen on the tape. But ask them what they were doing on that day and time and it is much harder to lie when they don't know what you know.
Don't ask for the tapes if you ain't got the tapes already.
I wonder if the Dems will call in Hillary to smash the devices that hold the video data, because it's totally okay for her to deliberately destroy up to 33,000 files under federal subpoena, that's already been established, "no reasonable prosecutor would file charges"!