4017
Comments (101)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
8
pithys 8 points ago +9 / -1

If he had the ability to see it, he should have instantly leaked it online

22
DJ_NeckFace 22 points ago +22 / -0

Never interrupt your enemy while they are making a mistake.

  • Sun Tzu - Art of War

Donald Trump - Art of The Deal

-1
ObjectiveReality -1 points ago +1 / -2

This can not be won in the courts until it is won in the court of public opinion.

These people should be leaking EVERYTHING.

There's no jury pool to tamper, these cases are going before judges.

14
Awakened 14 points ago +14 / -0

I totally agree. Problem is, he’s super professional and does everything by the book and according to the law. That’s how he saved Richard Jewel and handed the CIA their evil corrupt ass.

10
pithys 10 points ago +10 / -0

well hopefully he has a copy in case they delete it

8
Shakakka99 8 points ago +8 / -0

No. You let them all certify first, so they're knowingly complicit in election fraud. Then you drop the hammer, and roll them over on each other.

2
usuck911 2 points ago +2 / -0

those cowards who certified the election result will claim plausible deniability. it works all the time to save your ass!

1
Nes61 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what doomers need to read, reread, and then read again

5
TonyTreehouse 5 points ago +5 / -0

Unless there are clearly people doing some fraud like bubbling in blank ballots, then it would be better to hold off.

You take it, id people in the tape, then question them without them seeing the tape. If they see what's on tape ahead of time, they can try to make up excuses for what can be seen on the tape. But ask them what they were doing on that day and time and it is much harder to lie when they don't know what you know.