Why do I need to explain any representation at all? Do you have a problem with them just because they are Jews? Or do you have an issue with an ideology? If its ideology of some of these people that bothers you, then I am on your side, however , Ideology crosses all races and nationalities, it is not particular to only one, not is it an intrinsic quality of a single group.
When anyone is excluded or accepted because of their immutable qualities ?
Ya ,thats bad.
Are you ok with 'white' and Asian people being excluded or deemed over represented while Jewish people are left to dominate those very same institutions numbers wise ?
I have no problem with individual Jews because they're Jewish ,but you're being extremely disingenuous if you're saying they're not getting preferential treatment back by pretty well all 'authoritative ' powers in the west .
First off, I am against any affirmative actions, I am for meritocracy. I do not know of any laws that are structured to have Jews hired as a given percentage, I may be completely ignorant of such laws, just do not know of any exist, feel free to correct on that fact.
I mistook you for being serious .
Crazy how when people try to argue for the over-representation of Jews they always seem to ignore questions or points that show Jewish privilege , extreme Nepotism and visible bias by Jews for Jews (look at the data)...and demand you instead answer their questions based off things you never said to steer away from the blatantly obvious.
It seems that you believe that the over-representation of Jews in these fields (e.g. the list we're discussing) just happened randomly, or because more Jews are interested in pursuing such fields, e.g. bank, politics, cinema and so on.
Have you ever thought that many Goyim would happily pursue similar fields but there's a hidden barrier to entry that would make Jews much more likely to be accepted at equal level of skills and perseverance?
Could it be a possibility that when 100 Goyim and 2 Jews (all equally skilled) independently apply for a given high-profile position in banking or media, then 9 times out of 10 it will be one of the two Jews that are selected, instead of one of the 100 Goyim?
Explain the over representation that never gets called out. In Media , Academia , Politics and Finance ...
Why do I need to explain any representation at all? Do you have a problem with them just because they are Jews? Or do you have an issue with an ideology? If its ideology of some of these people that bothers you, then I am on your side, however , Ideology crosses all races and nationalities, it is not particular to only one, not is it an intrinsic quality of a single group.
When anyone is excluded or accepted because of their immutable qualities ? Ya ,thats bad. Are you ok with 'white' and Asian people being excluded or deemed over represented while Jewish people are left to dominate those very same institutions numbers wise ? I have no problem with individual Jews because they're Jewish ,but you're being extremely disingenuous if you're saying they're not getting preferential treatment back by pretty well all 'authoritative ' powers in the west .
First off, I am against any affirmative actions, I am for meritocracy. I do not know of any laws that are structured to have Jews hired as a given percentage, I may be completely ignorant of such laws, just do not know of any exist, feel free to correct on that fact.
I mistook you for being serious . Crazy how when people try to argue for the over-representation of Jews they always seem to ignore questions or points that show Jewish privilege , extreme Nepotism and visible bias by Jews for Jews (look at the data)...and demand you instead answer their questions based off things you never said to steer away from the blatantly obvious.
It seems that you believe that the over-representation of Jews in these fields (e.g. the list we're discussing) just happened randomly, or because more Jews are interested in pursuing such fields, e.g. bank, politics, cinema and so on.
Have you ever thought that many Goyim would happily pursue similar fields but there's a hidden barrier to entry that would make Jews much more likely to be accepted at equal level of skills and perseverance?
Could it be a possibility that when 100 Goyim and 2 Jews (all equally skilled) independently apply for a given high-profile position in banking or media, then 9 times out of 10 it will be one of the two Jews that are selected, instead of one of the 100 Goyim?