Why do I need to explain any representation at all? Do you have a problem with them just because they are Jews? Or do you have an issue with an ideology? If its ideology of some of these people that bothers you, then I am on your side, however , Ideology crosses all races and nationalities, it is not particular to only one, not is it an intrinsic quality of a single group.
When anyone is excluded or accepted because of their immutable qualities ?
Ya ,thats bad.
Are you ok with 'white' and Asian people being excluded or deemed over represented while Jewish people are left to dominate those very same institutions numbers wise ?
I have no problem with individual Jews because they're Jewish ,but you're being extremely disingenuous if you're saying they're not getting preferential treatment back by pretty well all 'authoritative ' powers in the west .
First off, I am against any affirmative actions, I am for meritocracy. I do not know of any laws that are structured to have Jews hired as a given percentage, I may be completely ignorant of such laws, just do not know of any exist, feel free to correct on that fact.
I mistook you for being serious .
Crazy how when people try to argue for the over-representation of Jews they always seem to ignore questions or points that show Jewish privilege , extreme Nepotism and visible bias by Jews for Jews (look at the data)...and demand you instead answer their questions based off things you never said to steer away from the blatantly obvious.
Well I suppose I may say the same about you, I mistook you for an intelligent person. Its funny how people who argue about Jews overrepresenting something, will lie about an actuality of them having issues with Jews and with a straight face will tell you that "no no issues with Jews," yet as soon as they are pressed for facts such as laws, they fall back on "oh come on dont you just see it, trust me its there, trust me dont deny it." Yeah, well excuse me for not trusting your assertions, and not blindly going with them. Are you too blind to see that the most of the government is nothing BUT nepotism? So what are you doing pointing at one nationality only? You dont have a problem with Jews, sure buddy, thanks for showing your true colors. Those who rule will surely be pleased with people like you, keep dividing, it will be much easier to rule over us.
It seems that you believe that the over-representation of Jews in these fields (e.g. the list we're discussing) just happened randomly, or because more Jews are interested in pursuing such fields, e.g. bank, politics, cinema and so on.
Have you ever thought that many Goyim would happily pursue similar fields but there's a hidden barrier to entry that would make Jews much more likely to be accepted at equal level of skills and perseverance?
Could it be a possibility that when 100 Goyim and 2 Jews (all equally skilled) independently apply for a given high-profile position in banking or media, then 9 times out of 10 it will be one of the two Jews that are selected, instead of one of the 100 Goyim?
Why do I need to explain any representation at all? Do you have a problem with them just because they are Jews? Or do you have an issue with an ideology? If its ideology of some of these people that bothers you, then I am on your side, however , Ideology crosses all races and nationalities, it is not particular to only one, not is it an intrinsic quality of a single group.
When anyone is excluded or accepted because of their immutable qualities ? Ya ,thats bad. Are you ok with 'white' and Asian people being excluded or deemed over represented while Jewish people are left to dominate those very same institutions numbers wise ? I have no problem with individual Jews because they're Jewish ,but you're being extremely disingenuous if you're saying they're not getting preferential treatment back by pretty well all 'authoritative ' powers in the west .
First off, I am against any affirmative actions, I am for meritocracy. I do not know of any laws that are structured to have Jews hired as a given percentage, I may be completely ignorant of such laws, just do not know of any exist, feel free to correct on that fact.
I mistook you for being serious . Crazy how when people try to argue for the over-representation of Jews they always seem to ignore questions or points that show Jewish privilege , extreme Nepotism and visible bias by Jews for Jews (look at the data)...and demand you instead answer their questions based off things you never said to steer away from the blatantly obvious.
Well I suppose I may say the same about you, I mistook you for an intelligent person. Its funny how people who argue about Jews overrepresenting something, will lie about an actuality of them having issues with Jews and with a straight face will tell you that "no no issues with Jews," yet as soon as they are pressed for facts such as laws, they fall back on "oh come on dont you just see it, trust me its there, trust me dont deny it." Yeah, well excuse me for not trusting your assertions, and not blindly going with them. Are you too blind to see that the most of the government is nothing BUT nepotism? So what are you doing pointing at one nationality only? You dont have a problem with Jews, sure buddy, thanks for showing your true colors. Those who rule will surely be pleased with people like you, keep dividing, it will be much easier to rule over us.
It seems that you believe that the over-representation of Jews in these fields (e.g. the list we're discussing) just happened randomly, or because more Jews are interested in pursuing such fields, e.g. bank, politics, cinema and so on.
Have you ever thought that many Goyim would happily pursue similar fields but there's a hidden barrier to entry that would make Jews much more likely to be accepted at equal level of skills and perseverance?
Could it be a possibility that when 100 Goyim and 2 Jews (all equally skilled) independently apply for a given high-profile position in banking or media, then 9 times out of 10 it will be one of the two Jews that are selected, instead of one of the 100 Goyim?