Well, we can speculate if he likes it or not. It would be really sad if he wouldn't... especially when Big Mike comes home grumpy after pulling trucks on TV, and orders him to bend over. A skill Obama is quite proficient in - figuratively and literally.
I still haven't seen proof of this. Not being douchy, I just haven't seen the proof. Now, to be clear, I think there's a very good possibility it was, especially given the death of what's her name and the video footage of the plane (or helicopter?) crash in the ocean, but.. just hear me out:
The "proof" everyone always cites, is the PDF document, the layers in it, and that video of the analysis of said PDF and layers (if this isn't the proof you're basing your claim on, then I guess disregard my comment, and let me know what info you were looking at as proof).
So, why don't I view the PDF document, and the layers, as proof? Because I deal with PDF documents, and making scans of paper documents to digitize them daily (both for work, and just for whatever regular situations). Both my work's scanner, and even just my cheap, home, all-in-one canon printer/scanner, would produce the exact same results if I scanned Obama's, or even my own birth certificate. When I scan a document, it produces these exact same layers. There's an option to have it not do that and produce a clean image, but if not selected, it produces the exact results seen with Obama's, where those layers can be removed, showing a kind of "fill in the blank" document. From there, anybody could search for someone else's document to simply find a name that fits into that removed layer.
Doesn't mean I'm right, just that the "pdf layers," argument for proof of a forged document is... silly, and I don't think anybody who uses that argument has ever actually used a scanner to scan a document into their computer and see how it produces layers, and essentially exactly what Obama's birth certificate PDF file looks like.
edit — I offered a sound rationale. If you're going to downvote without giving any evidence, sources, or things that I've missed, than I'm just going to assume you're downvoting because you want to believe so bad and will reject anything that goes against that confirmation bias. I have that confirmation bias, too, and want it to be true — but I also think critically, and am going to verify theories like this, especially when it's so easy to do; so again, if I'm wrong, someone explain to me why... I want to be wrong and would love to hear why I am. I EVEN NOTED it may be true, and maybe I'm missing something (hence asking earlier for evidence beyond what I was speaking to). So, again, kindly engage in discussion instead of downvoting simply because you don't like my conclusion. I don't like my conclusion, either — but based on the argument (PDF layers) and the subsequent video that was posted... I'm simply stating a fact that anyone who's used a scanner to create a pdf file of a document knows. Layers (and deleting them, and finding a document where the same fields, filled with different info, matches into those fields that open when you delete the layers) are not proof of a forged document. They are proof that a document was scanned without deselecting the 'create layers' option
Yeah, that's the video I saw and the analysis I'm talking about. The foundation of the argument is built on the "layers theory," which just doesn't hold up, or at least is far from definitive proof. It doesn't mean that it isn't the case, but it's also definitely not a smoking gun that it was forged. Any and every document, scanned, will produce layers (unless you specifically tell the software not do and to produce it as a single pdf with no layers identified and separated), where it specifically highlights and separates(layers) filled-in fields, like names, etc. So that's normal/ordinary, and not some mistake they made in exporting to cover their tracks. If you have an all-in-one printer/scanner, try it out sometime with any kind of similar document (I just did this recently, by accident/forgetting to uncheck the layer option, when scanning a health insurance document). So now, we have a document with layers (again, not unusual), where they managed to find another birth certificate where the filled-in information fits perfectly into Obama's certificate if those layers were to be removed. So, sure... maybe that happened. But I can do the same with my birth certificate: scan it, export it with the layers, delete the layers so those fields are now blank, and then search for another birth certificate, do the same process, until I find one where the information fits into the blanks/removed layers on my scanned birth certificate.
I upvoted you, pede. I would take issue with the statement of not seeing proof. I think many here are frustrated with that as a general statement, since many have said there is no proof of election fraud, when the old guy confessed on video. You may not believe the proof to be convincing, but to say you haven't seen proof is incorrect.
Also, I would argue that with these kinds of things you should put the burden on the person who holds the evidence. For example, in both the birth certificate case and in the vote counting, they could have had a neutral arbiter examine the original document on video, but chose instead to send a file that you or I could have easily made ourselves and say we are to just believe.
Yup, I get it. My issue isn't with the voter fraud — I've seen enough evidence; some of it I don't have the expertise to say whether or not it's legit, so I look for other's analysis and review and make my decision on that.
But my issue w/ the birth certificate is: I've seen the video everyone references, and understand 100% the argument the forensics expert is making — that video isn't "proof," though: it's a proposed theory, hypothesis drawn, evidence presented, and a conclusion drawn based on analysis of said evidence — and as noted in earlier comments, the analysis and thus conclusion is flawed, because the layers are standard. It's simply just... what happens when you scan a document and digitize it in pdf format. I can see how others would view it as proof if they aren't familiar with that process — hell, I thought it was compelling, too, years ago when I first saw the video... and then I had to scan a document one day, and found the scanned file produced the same results. I was immediately reminded of that video, went back to watch, and no longer found it compelling after now understanding it more. It's simply not a sound argument (for the reasons I've mentioned above). There's not much else I can do other than to suggest that others (assuming they have any old all-in-one printer/scanner) find a similarly formatted document of their own, scan it themselves (without deselecting the 'create layers' option), export it to a PDF, and do the same. They can even print Obama's published birth certificate, and do the process with that exactly, and compare it with doing the same to any other birth certificate (their own, a family members, an example one found online, etc). General point is, the layers, and being able to remove them and fill them in w/ info from someone else's who fits perfectly, is not proof. Layers proves nothing :::shrug:::
edit - and again, my bigger issue is with those that downvote but don't comment. It just tells me they're angry, don't like the conclusion, believe their own conclusion to be true, but then offered no reason for why I was wrong. I didn't force it or aggressively tell anyone they were wrong. I simply offered my rationale for why I don't buy it. If someone has info and/or an explanation that I don't... how about share that instead of downvoting (or at least sharing it if you're going to downvote?). The downvote w/ no response to the kind of comment I made is aggravating as hell and feels like every debate I've had with leftists
You mean to tell me that being a gay dude married to a tranny and having fake kids to fool the world you are a loving American family just so you can commit treason by sacrificing the country to the globalist agenda is fraud? Get outta here!!...
That smug face, back in 2008 I wondered how he slept at night knowing he was elected by Black families because they wanted a Black president.
Then I found out, he sleeps well at night with all the money, the fraud, helping his powerful friends. Worst president ever and I hope he is properly judged for his crimes when he passes.
I doubt he won 2012 but I think Obummer won in 2008. Much more enthusiasm than Sleepy McCain. McCain would've been just as bad and probably have started 5 more wars.
I'm actually on the fence. I'm not so sure Obama was the biggest fraud so much as Bush was. Bush gave us the infrastructure that Obama leveraged to carry out the CIA's bidding of endless wars.
What I do know is that evil exists in the world to bring forth the greater good.
The affirmative blacktion President...leftists want us to believe blacks have it hard in America...if you're black, can string two sentences together, and can wear a suit without looking like a ganster, they'll literally make you President with zero qualifications...sounds like blacks have it so difficult.
Meh, he was a puppet with Hillary’s hand so far up his ass he could taste nail polish.
Probably the best front man the Dems will ever have. Bill was another good one and Carter before that. What they all had in common is they weren’t leaders. They were elected based on likability. Carter was a nice guy but horrible. Bill could care less as long he could get fresh meat. Obama was great for the cameras. Reagan was a leader, Bush Sr and establishment CIA plant, Bush Jr was our Obama and affable puppet. Cheney ran that show. Tump is the real deal, better than Reagan even for America First policies. We needed him right after Reagan.
I'm from Chicago. She's not. There are school pictures of her in Chicago and many many people grew up with her.
But the tranny angle is fun and Berry definitely spent a lot of time in the Chicago bath houses. That was the word on the street in the early 90s. Another interesting thing is even when Obama was a US senator he didn't even crack the top 10 in political power in Chicago. In many ways he was a nonentity.
I have lived in Minnesota all my life, I know election fraud, election fraud is a hated enemy of mine, from the first moment I saw Obama, he made my skin crawl, I knew he was a huckster, but I had no idea of the forces behind his rise. Forces that at times, over the years seemed unstoppable - TILL NOW !
And if you look back over my comments from 2008 on, anywhere on the web, you will read that the same fraud detectors that went into overdrive with Obama singled out Kamala Harris.
There are many people who serve the evil that is trying to destroy us and Obama is first among them. Kamala Harris is a servant to that same evil, and since 2008 she has stood shoulder to shoulder with Obama.
I always wondered back in 08 why people voted for him just because of his skin color. dude was the furthest thing away from pro America and literally harvested votes for dems in the future by giving so many illegals drivers licenses etc
The *BIGGEST *fraud? How about the "pandemic" perpetuated on 7 billion of us? How about "climate change" perpetuated on the WHOLE PLANET for half a century? Hard to pick the biggest lie we are living under.
Exhibit a little restraint. This is just as hyperbolic as the left calling Trump "literally Hitler." Obama was a boring corporate moderate Dem. There have been far more corrupt politicians.
At least unlike Biden he actually won an election. Twice, in fact.
Hey it's that guy that likes sucking his wife's dick
Well, we can speculate if he likes it or not. It would be really sad if he wouldn't... especially when Big Mike comes home grumpy after pulling trucks on TV, and orders him to bend over. A skill Obama is quite proficient in - figuratively and literally.
He's frowning bc Big Mike didn't get his other eye too
I saw that mug on a bumper sticker - "Does this ASS make my truck look big?"
Hey dont forget about me either!
Terrorist
That is a strange way to spell "Traitor".
That is a strange way to spell “treasonous pile of excrement”.
To be a traitor he had to be one of us to begin with. I think in time Trump questioning the validity of his birth certificate will age well.
Obongo’s birth certificate was a proven forgery.
I still haven't seen proof of this. Not being douchy, I just haven't seen the proof. Now, to be clear, I think there's a very good possibility it was, especially given the death of what's her name and the video footage of the plane (or helicopter?) crash in the ocean, but.. just hear me out:
The "proof" everyone always cites, is the PDF document, the layers in it, and that video of the analysis of said PDF and layers (if this isn't the proof you're basing your claim on, then I guess disregard my comment, and let me know what info you were looking at as proof).
So, why don't I view the PDF document, and the layers, as proof? Because I deal with PDF documents, and making scans of paper documents to digitize them daily (both for work, and just for whatever regular situations). Both my work's scanner, and even just my cheap, home, all-in-one canon printer/scanner, would produce the exact same results if I scanned Obama's, or even my own birth certificate. When I scan a document, it produces these exact same layers. There's an option to have it not do that and produce a clean image, but if not selected, it produces the exact results seen with Obama's, where those layers can be removed, showing a kind of "fill in the blank" document. From there, anybody could search for someone else's document to simply find a name that fits into that removed layer.
Doesn't mean I'm right, just that the "pdf layers," argument for proof of a forged document is... silly, and I don't think anybody who uses that argument has ever actually used a scanner to scan a document into their computer and see how it produces layers, and essentially exactly what Obama's birth certificate PDF file looks like.
edit — I offered a sound rationale. If you're going to downvote without giving any evidence, sources, or things that I've missed, than I'm just going to assume you're downvoting because you want to believe so bad and will reject anything that goes against that confirmation bias. I have that confirmation bias, too, and want it to be true — but I also think critically, and am going to verify theories like this, especially when it's so easy to do; so again, if I'm wrong, someone explain to me why... I want to be wrong and would love to hear why I am. I EVEN NOTED it may be true, and maybe I'm missing something (hence asking earlier for evidence beyond what I was speaking to). So, again, kindly engage in discussion instead of downvoting simply because you don't like my conclusion. I don't like my conclusion, either — but based on the argument (PDF layers) and the subsequent video that was posted... I'm simply stating a fact that anyone who's used a scanner to create a pdf file of a document knows. Layers (and deleting them, and finding a document where the same fields, filled with different info, matches into those fields that open when you delete the layers) are not proof of a forged document. They are proof that a document was scanned without deselecting the 'create layers' option
YouTube scrubbed the original video so forgive me if this ain’t the right one but it appears to be.
https://youtu.be/LszXAgGcTP8
Yeah, that's the video I saw and the analysis I'm talking about. The foundation of the argument is built on the "layers theory," which just doesn't hold up, or at least is far from definitive proof. It doesn't mean that it isn't the case, but it's also definitely not a smoking gun that it was forged. Any and every document, scanned, will produce layers (unless you specifically tell the software not do and to produce it as a single pdf with no layers identified and separated), where it specifically highlights and separates(layers) filled-in fields, like names, etc. So that's normal/ordinary, and not some mistake they made in exporting to cover their tracks. If you have an all-in-one printer/scanner, try it out sometime with any kind of similar document (I just did this recently, by accident/forgetting to uncheck the layer option, when scanning a health insurance document). So now, we have a document with layers (again, not unusual), where they managed to find another birth certificate where the filled-in information fits perfectly into Obama's certificate if those layers were to be removed. So, sure... maybe that happened. But I can do the same with my birth certificate: scan it, export it with the layers, delete the layers so those fields are now blank, and then search for another birth certificate, do the same process, until I find one where the information fits into the blanks/removed layers on my scanned birth certificate.
I upvoted you, pede. I would take issue with the statement of not seeing proof. I think many here are frustrated with that as a general statement, since many have said there is no proof of election fraud, when the old guy confessed on video. You may not believe the proof to be convincing, but to say you haven't seen proof is incorrect.
Also, I would argue that with these kinds of things you should put the burden on the person who holds the evidence. For example, in both the birth certificate case and in the vote counting, they could have had a neutral arbiter examine the original document on video, but chose instead to send a file that you or I could have easily made ourselves and say we are to just believe.
Yup, I get it. My issue isn't with the voter fraud — I've seen enough evidence; some of it I don't have the expertise to say whether or not it's legit, so I look for other's analysis and review and make my decision on that.
But my issue w/ the birth certificate is: I've seen the video everyone references, and understand 100% the argument the forensics expert is making — that video isn't "proof," though: it's a proposed theory, hypothesis drawn, evidence presented, and a conclusion drawn based on analysis of said evidence — and as noted in earlier comments, the analysis and thus conclusion is flawed, because the layers are standard. It's simply just... what happens when you scan a document and digitize it in pdf format. I can see how others would view it as proof if they aren't familiar with that process — hell, I thought it was compelling, too, years ago when I first saw the video... and then I had to scan a document one day, and found the scanned file produced the same results. I was immediately reminded of that video, went back to watch, and no longer found it compelling after now understanding it more. It's simply not a sound argument (for the reasons I've mentioned above). There's not much else I can do other than to suggest that others (assuming they have any old all-in-one printer/scanner) find a similarly formatted document of their own, scan it themselves (without deselecting the 'create layers' option), export it to a PDF, and do the same. They can even print Obama's published birth certificate, and do the process with that exactly, and compare it with doing the same to any other birth certificate (their own, a family members, an example one found online, etc). General point is, the layers, and being able to remove them and fill them in w/ info from someone else's who fits perfectly, is not proof. Layers proves nothing :::shrug:::
edit - and again, my bigger issue is with those that downvote but don't comment. It just tells me they're angry, don't like the conclusion, believe their own conclusion to be true, but then offered no reason for why I was wrong. I didn't force it or aggressively tell anyone they were wrong. I simply offered my rationale for why I don't buy it. If someone has info and/or an explanation that I don't... how about share that instead of downvoting (or at least sharing it if you're going to downvote?). The downvote w/ no response to the kind of comment I made is aggravating as hell and feels like every debate I've had with leftists
0bummer certainly aged like spoiled milk.
Guess evil does rot you from the inside out.
Well when you're getting dicked in the ass by a cross-dressing tranny who does demon shit...
Do us all a huge favor and don't put this traitors face on this Web site. Yuk.
Ok, just need to get everyone motivated this morning.
fucking salvador dali painting lookin ass nigga
Golf clap.
Screwed That Up
He is the single reason why there will never be a "legitimate" BLACK United States President.
Like Kamala, we can’t be sure the guy is part black.
Obunga, likes to suck big Mike’s cock.
That Flint Water Crisis thing should have been enough of an eye-opener.
But noooo..... lets ignore that.
Obama the Great Divider!
And, yes, he is a Pole Smoker!
Obamagate DWARFS Watergate....disappears it!
You mean to tell me that being a gay dude married to a tranny and having fake kids to fool the world you are a loving American family just so you can commit treason by sacrificing the country to the globalist agenda is fraud? Get outta here!!...
That smug face, back in 2008 I wondered how he slept at night knowing he was elected by Black families because they wanted a Black president.
Then I found out, he sleeps well at night with all the money, the fraud, helping his powerful friends. Worst president ever and I hope he is properly judged for his crimes when he passes.
Actually, he did deeper & more lasting damage to our America than Pearl Harbor & 9/11 combined...
FAGGOOTTTT!!!!
At this point we can firmly say he never actually got voted into office, also.
I doubt he won 2012 but I think Obummer won in 2008. Much more enthusiasm than Sleepy McCain. McCain would've been just as bad and probably have started 5 more wars.
Dominion, agreed.
I pray for this man’s destruction. All of you should too.
Im sure he's on some patriots list some where.
I wonder if we will ever know who, or what, occupied the White House from 2009 through 2016? I'm thinking we will never know. Rather amazing....
If if if if if if if if if if if if if if if if
Second biggest
I'm actually on the fence. I'm not so sure Obama was the biggest fraud so much as Bush was. Bush gave us the infrastructure that Obama leveraged to carry out the CIA's bidding of endless wars.
What I do know is that evil exists in the world to bring forth the greater good.
Thus:
MAGA
I misread fraud as faggot.
I detest this gosh darn rigger!
The affirmative blacktion President...leftists want us to believe blacks have it hard in America...if you're black, can string two sentences together, and can wear a suit without looking like a ganster, they'll literally make you President with zero qualifications...sounds like blacks have it so difficult.
Winky frown? What does that even mean?!
Nah that’s not central banking combined with income tax. Terrible dude though.
Meh, he was a puppet with Hillary’s hand so far up his ass he could taste nail polish.
Probably the best front man the Dems will ever have. Bill was another good one and Carter before that. What they all had in common is they weren’t leaders. They were elected based on likability. Carter was a nice guy but horrible. Bill could care less as long he could get fresh meat. Obama was great for the cameras. Reagan was a leader, Bush Sr and establishment CIA plant, Bush Jr was our Obama and affable puppet. Cheney ran that show. Tump is the real deal, better than Reagan even for America First policies. We needed him right after Reagan.
Honest question with jokes aside: is his wife really a tranny? Is that beyond doubt now?
I'm from Chicago. She's not. There are school pictures of her in Chicago and many many people grew up with her. But the tranny angle is fun and Berry definitely spent a lot of time in the Chicago bath houses. That was the word on the street in the early 90s. Another interesting thing is even when Obama was a US senator he didn't even crack the top 10 in political power in Chicago. In many ways he was a nonentity.
How do you explain the dick then?
President Chauncy Gardener.
You mean Big Mike. Sssshhhhhhhh, remember what happened to Joan Rivers.
Thomas Sowell has entered the chat.
The BiG GUY. ?? That’s my take. Joe and hunter were splitting that cut of 20% The BiG GUY was in for 10%.
He served eight years too long.
He’s like the 3rd biggest at this point.
Yeah. Article II Sec I Clause 5 (natural born citizen) being defied was the Constitutional Crisis that initially rocked the foundation of our Country.
Everything else is just a result of............
Fuck face Hussein.
Did Mitt Romney get a tan?
as my buddy used to say about some: "he's a real piece of shit"
Looks like Obama not covid.
I have lived in Minnesota all my life, I know election fraud, election fraud is a hated enemy of mine, from the first moment I saw Obama, he made my skin crawl, I knew he was a huckster, but I had no idea of the forces behind his rise. Forces that at times, over the years seemed unstoppable - TILL NOW !
And if you look back over my comments from 2008 on, anywhere on the web, you will read that the same fraud detectors that went into overdrive with Obama singled out Kamala Harris.
There are many people who serve the evil that is trying to destroy us and Obama is first among them. Kamala Harris is a servant to that same evil, and since 2008 she has stood shoulder to shoulder with Obama.
I always wondered back in 08 why people voted for him just because of his skin color. dude was the furthest thing away from pro America and literally harvested votes for dems in the future by giving so many illegals drivers licenses etc
Big Mike shot a load in his eye.
The *BIGGEST *fraud? How about the "pandemic" perpetuated on 7 billion of us? How about "climate change" perpetuated on the WHOLE PLANET for half a century? Hard to pick the biggest lie we are living under.
Who do you think is part of a parallel deepstate government now?
Updoots for everyone!
This puppet doesnt look like Henry Kissinger
Probably same look he as when getting hammered by his "wife".
Exhibit a little restraint. This is just as hyperbolic as the left calling Trump "literally Hitler." Obama was a boring corporate moderate Dem. There have been far more corrupt politicians.
At least unlike Biden he actually won an election. Twice, in fact.