I think the OP was careless in explaining his interpretation, which is; coincidence does not determine causality.
This document is not meant or intended to be a silver bullet. What this affadavit provides is character and standing as credible attestation of an expert cybersecurity professional.
"here are my credentials, here is what I have witnessed (vulnerable systems), and here is how it applied to the election in Michigan with irrefutable data points"
It is a quality story that tells a narrative of potential fraud (which we all know to be true) that bolsters the case for fraud.
March forward pedes, it's drop in the bucket of a monumental amount of evidence that will push MAGA to the winner's circle.
I think the OP was careless in explaining his interpretation, which is; coincidence does not determine causality.
This document is not meant or intended to be a silver bullet. What this affadavit provides is character and standing as credible attestation of an expert cybersecurity professional.
"here are my credentials, here is what I have witnessed (vulnerable systems), and here is how it applied to the election in Michigan with irrefutable data points"
It is a quality story that tells a narrative of potential fraud (which we all know to be true) that bolsters the case for fraud.
March forward pedes, it's drop in the bucket of a monumental amount of evidence that will push MAGA to the winner's circle.