I posted this on here days ago. 289,000 more ballots counted than could possibly be processed through the machines. How much more evidence do you need? It’s not even mechanically possible for them to have counted that many votes.
Is that number based on the correct data? I hope dearly that it is. This guy botched the townships list as heard in the wrong state. (Go look- Minn not Mich). Not a doomer, not new here. Just pointing out a flaw that doesn’t pass one min of investigation and I hope it doesn’t invalidate the other points in the document!
I posted this on here days ago. 289,000 more ballots counted than could possibly be processed through the machines. How much more evidence do you need? It’s not even mechanically possible for them to have counted that many votes.
Is that number based on the correct data? I hope dearly that it is. This guy botched the townships list as heard in the wrong state. (Go look- Minn not Mich). Not a doomer, not new here. Just pointing out a flaw that doesn’t pass one min of investigation and I hope it doesn’t invalidate the other points in the document!
Same although a part of me known that lawyers can use this small but significant slip-up to discredit the whole content :(