7836
Comments (249)
sorted by:
231
Gmama2 231 points ago +232 / -1

Matt is a rockstar.

I would really like to see evidence of vote switching via the recounts.

164
Doc_Liberty [S] 164 points ago +165 / -1 (edited)

That would be incredible.

Matt is doing the needed, heavy statistical lift that proving faud will take. I wish this was the Trump team's strategy from the start, it's too easy to dismiss witnesses for these activist judges. Not that they are unimportant, but I like when numbers are the backbone of a case myself.

EDIT:

He's going to get all these ballots tossed out! GA law does NOT allow using PO box addresses to request absentee ballots.

https://twitter.com/MattBraynard/status/1331323676474617857?s=20

71
redhot_alex 71 points ago +71 / -0

THIS IS GOING TO HELP US A LOT!!

BUT CONCEDE! (says the cucks)

51
Trump-Train 51 points ago +51 / -0

don't you take your marching orders from Chris Christie and Mittens Romney?

33
lockxirup 33 points ago +33 / -0

I wouldn’t even take advice from them on where to get dinner or how to marry multiple wives

24
ThePowerOfPrayer 24 points ago +24 / -0

I'd trust Chris Christie to find a restaurant unless I was on a diet.

14
FergieJR 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yeah he's a cuck but he's the first dude I'd ask where to eat in NJ 😂😂

10
Dessert4TWO69 10 points ago +10 / -0

the cuck would eat anything, are you really sure?

4
GutturalCorn 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why would you want to go to NJ though?

3
Pirate_Lafitte 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wouldn't trust Chris christie to be able to get out of his bathtub without assistance

13
Trump-Train 13 points ago +13 / -0

Dude they are experts at that.

You know Chris Christie has the hook-up on the real deal Italian places in Jersey

Mitt doesn't look like he could fuck his way out of a wet paper sack tho....so it's hard to imagine him even wanting multiple wives haha

10
Pederella 10 points ago +10 / -0

I dunno....multiple wives would give Pierre access to all of their boyfriends.....or them access to him....🤔

7
Lingerlonger 7 points ago +7 / -0

I heard a few years back on Rogans podcast that the Romney family has compounds in Mexico to skirt polygamy laws, they need armed Security to protect them from cartel kidnappings. All that to fuck more than one wife at a time.

4
FergieJR 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah he's the last guy I'd look for to save America but the first to find me some good take out!

25
GlacialSpeed 25 points ago +25 / -0

Every day there's more evidence.

Every. Day.

We've got them.

For anyone that needs to hear it: You're not alone or crazy. You are part of 80+ million pissed off voters who will not be cheated out of their country.

3
MAGAHatPepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck yeah, I'm with you!

2
lanman 2 points ago +2 / -0

[tear in eye] ...Thank you. I really needed that tonight.

[sniff]

7
ProfessorRomendev 7 points ago +7 / -0

I’m not even sure Chris Christie knows how to march

6
FergieJR 6 points ago +6 / -0

"It's like that month that isn't summer but is not winter" - Chris Christie

6
redhot_alex 6 points ago +6 / -0

mitt romney lost his fucking mind lol

more like baseball mitt romney lol x2>

3
Varangian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, maybe not them, but Paul Ryan, well that’s a horse of another color....

10
Rreidy8286 10 points ago +10 / -0

No one is listening to them. Fuck em

21
John_Smallberries 21 points ago +22 / -1

"More baseless accusations by the Trump team."

--Washington Post

3
FergieJR 3 points ago +3 / -0

Disoooopted

16
ShittRomney 16 points ago +16 / -0

Oh look, another new account providing immediate benefit to this glorious community.

17
Doc_Liberty [S] 17 points ago +17 / -0

Just a fellow patriot trying to hold the line

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
14
I_Love_45-70_Gov 14 points ago +14 / -0

Team Trump is going the tried and true 14th Amendment: Equal Protection Clause. It is the fastest route to the SCOTUS, and is difficult to argue against.

8
Joesf23 8 points ago +9 / -1

Amazing if we could get the federal government to guard against fuckery in our elections and investigate said fuckery once it is done. Maybe even a couple of agencies to do this so we dont have to, while maybe our elected reps see to it that it is looked into? Wouldn't that be great for our constitutional republic? Maybe one day this will happen so we dont turn into a banana republic..../s

10
Doc_Liberty [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

I know, it's sad what has happened to my country. This guy's work was literally crowd-funded by a bunch of real patriot, while the DOJ are nowhere to be seen

7
Joesf23 7 points ago +8 / -1

Why do we even pay taxes?? What do we get out of it at this point?

4
dizzle_izzle 4 points ago +4 / -0

Roads? I mean the only thing I can think of is roads....

1
Joesf23 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lol highways, border walls and a nation defense of OUR country. Not police for shithole countries or a military built on SJW principles

1
dizzle_izzle 1 point ago +1 / -0

There ya go. That's it.

14
SayItAintJoe 14 points ago +14 / -0

This looks promising to me - I'd like to see this stickied so people can dig into it.

https://thedonald.win/p/11QRyMwTvb/the-kraken-is-getting-coached-up/c/

14
NZ_needs_a_Trump 14 points ago +14 / -0

I just want to hijack top comment. Just because you check votes against postal facilities and so on doesn't mean there isn't a ton more out there. There are virtual addresses and so on people can use to fake a residential address. It's likely that there would be other instances of fake addresses and so on. When you lie cheat and steal you spread it out as much as possible so it's less obvious and harder to get caught.

13
Doc_Liberty [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

Yes, he only took a sample of the population. Matt is literally crowd-funded (go fund me took his original fund down) and decided to do this pretty much after everyone saw the election-night vote drop.

He has limited resources, and we have limited time.

5
Gmama2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agreed, it was very smart because it is harder to prove 20 different cheat methods than one, and if the case is weak for one it starts to look like grasping for straws.

2
Frumplmeist311 2 points ago +2 / -0

It coming.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
90
Doc_Liberty [S] 90 points ago +91 / -1

Not sure about anyone else, but I've thought from the begining it was going to have to be this kind of stuff that really gets the courts to take a hard look at whats going on in the states. Time to start peeling back the layers of the onion now.

By the way, 1400 voters doesn't sound like much, but from what I understand, that is just from his sample, not the entire voting population.

50
FireannDireach 50 points ago +50 / -0

This is the kind of analysis that would never have been done in elections past. Nobody ever thought to/wanted to take too close a look at numbers like this. "Go along, to get along", that kind of thing.

Makes you wonder if they took a close, long, hard look at the numbers in CA or NY, what they would find.

We know the answer.

4
Pirate_Lafitte 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's why that rep in NY files a complaint with the bar against rudy - he's terrified of rudy exposing to the world how big city politics actually operates

18
NotoriousCIC 18 points ago +18 / -0

This is stuff that needed to be addressed years ago. Voter ID is an absolute must and the left can GFT at their "voter suppression" nonsense. The right wants as much transparency as possible while the left wants to operate in the shadows. That could not be clearer.

13
zooty 13 points ago +13 / -0

The courts deal with hard facts though. This is important in the court of public opinion but the courts need to see facts which invalidate ballots.

8
Paveto 8 points ago +8 / -0

It proves significant fraud. Most fraudulent ballots are hard to prove and probably 20-50 x 1400

5
swanzinator 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'd love to know the denominator that goes with that 1400 number. 1400 out of how many samples?

67
Usefulmoron 67 points ago +67 / -0

Soldiers step aside for a moment, it's the nerds' time to save the USA!

28
Doc_Liberty [S] 28 points ago +28 / -0

We need as many nerds as possible right now!

15
darthmatt005 15 points ago +15 / -0

We have the best nerds and number crunchers!!

13
esheki808 13 points ago +13 / -0

Tfw your brain explodes because your both.

11
Fantastic-person 11 points ago +12 / -1

...and the meek shall inherit the earth...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
46
stealthboy 46 points ago +46 / -0

"Sure, you can show us all the proof of fraud you want, but there still is no proof of fraud." - the talking heads, probably

14
Doc_Liberty [S] 14 points ago +14 / -0

Spot on

14
GlacialSpeed 14 points ago +14 / -0

LMAO, this is exactly it. No matter what you show them they'll say "No proof though"

Propoganda will never change, we just gotta keep going around/through them.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
7
lolpaladins 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yea, sure, thousands of illegal ballots, but that isn’t “widespread”

3
populist_nationalist 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is why they always use the "widespread" weasel word. The scope of "widespread" could be anything.

29
Vla1ne 29 points ago +29 / -0

These kinds of things take time, and have to fly under the radar till done, in order to work at their best. This is the kind of work powell ic currently pushing against dominion. One step at a time pedes, the fight has yet to end.

18
Doc_Liberty [S] 18 points ago +18 / -0

No doubt. I can't imagine what it would be like to try and synthesize all this evidence that is coming in from so many places and get it ready to present in a court.

I don't think everyone understands how important this is to get right. I know nothing about Dominion but I hope Sidney can deliver.

Jenna was right when she said this is moving at lightspeed compared to most court proceedings.

16
Vla1ne 16 points ago +16 / -0

Folks don't get that. They expect a court case to be drafred in undee two weeks despite new evidence popping up every day or two, they want immediate irrefutable allegations and evidence, despite that usually coming after the allegations are investigated.

Doomers and critics alike are failing to see how hard the fight is, and how much has to be done day by day.

9
ThreeHeadedEagle 9 points ago +9 / -0

I completely agree. If you look at the big picture. This type of fraud has been going on for years and there is a lot of power and money behind it. It's woven into our election process. Trump winning the election is just the beginning. They have a very strong case proving voter fraud occurred but we still gotta get to the bottom of this. It's going to take a lot work from all us to drain the swamp. MAGA FOREVER!

1
HumanSomewhere 1 point ago +1 / -0

the fight goes on, but it has a pretty hard end date. whatever is going to happen is going to happen soon.

28
Ieggo 28 points ago +29 / -1

it makes me furious that the corrupt DOJ and FBI are absent and only chasing after non existent white supremacists.

13
Doc_Liberty [S] 13 points ago +14 / -1

Right, we literally crowdfunded this guy so he could buy the offical ballot data and the DOJ is nowhere to be found

8
DrunkenChewbacca 8 points ago +9 / -1

Imagine the greatness that could be accomplished if the FBI and DOJ investigated this!!

1
joebidet 1 point ago +4 / -3

It’s Trumps fault for not putting maga people in these places

1
Pirate_Lafitte 1 point ago +1 / -0

Appointing wray was a terrible mistake.

28
H_Guderian 28 points ago +30 / -2

This is how they got us. Let's say Biden won by 12,000 votes.

One scheme steals 4,000. A second Scheme swaps 4,000. A third scheme forged the other 4,000.

The court looks at each and says "yes, the scheme is corrupt, but it won't change the outcome so we won't hear it. Then they look at the second scheme and go, 'hmm, these 4,000 votes also cannot overturn the election on their own, so no need to weigh in. And on the third case they say, "We have said twice already that irregularities this small will not be heard, no matter the evidence, as it won't change the outcome.

Republican Democracy died this year by a bunch of smaller schemes that each by themselves couldn't have done it.

10
Doc_Liberty [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yep. Don't get me wrong, I'd love it if we found a massive smoking gun, but this feels much more tangible to me. We just need to get enough statistical evidence for the courts to allow more time...

10
swanzinator 10 points ago +10 / -0

I think we're going to find they manufactured waaaaay more than 12,000 votes. Probably at least an order or magnitude more than that. Which is why they're gonna get caught. There's no way GA is such an extreme outlier from every adjoining state.

5
FreedomFighter87 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly right. GA did not go blue. There is fraud everywhere. Up against the clock. I bet they would be able to find north of 100,000 fraudulent ballots in quick order given the resources.

2
RexCollumSilvarum 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wouldn't be surprised if the total number of manufactured votes is seven figures if everything comes to light. That includes millions in solid "blue" states like California and New York.

8
Chodefish 8 points ago +8 / -0

good analysis. Shapiro kept parroting this line the past week. that it's not enough to change any outcomes

5
MuadDon 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don’t think it died so much as the nation finally saw its corpse.

1
reformedhippie 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn't need to cover the spread. Mass voting fraud overturns elections.

22
BSnatch 22 points ago +22 / -0

STOP RAPING ME WITH YOUR STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
20
deleted 20 points ago +21 / -1
7
MakeAmericaLegendary 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm hearing rumors about their strategy in GA. They haven't filed there yet, correct? This will most likely all go into securing Georgia.

7
Doc_Liberty [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yep, he has done a lot. Apparently the lawyers are taking on the phone bank part though

14
TowerLake 14 points ago +17 / -3 (edited)

What we really need is less memes and more efforts to organize.

It’s our lack of organizing that’s allowing the suppression and silencing of conservatives, especially those who vocally support our president.

It’s our lack of organizing that’s allows organizations that support our president Suddenly having thier bank account and payment processor shut down.

It’s our lack of organizing that’s allowing the MSM slandering our president.

It’s our lack of organizing that’s allowing companies like mailchimp,facebook,eventbrite to attempt to cancel trump rallies.

Think of how many people didn’t show up because the believe the fake email that the MAGA MILLION MARCH was canceled

It pisses me off to no end that instead, people focus on upvoting memes

Edit: I’m not worried about Trump winning. He’s gonna win.

What I’m worried about is when he wins, everyone who voted for him will pat themselves in the back and disappear, leaving Trump to fix everything, all alone. Literally what happened his entire first 4 years.

7
deleted 7 points ago +9 / -2
2
grunt2pog 2 points ago +2 / -0

60 days? Try 20 days (Dec 14)

6
EnemiesDestroyed 6 points ago +8 / -2

Absolutely. Then they get offended we don’t care for their dead horse boating accident or tranny memes.

3
TowerLake 3 points ago +6 / -3

It’s even worse because the mods are ones stickying the memes.

Do they no realize that 90% of the sticky’s are memes and the remaining 10% are filled with top level comments that are basically meme statements.

1
Pirate_Lafitte 1 point ago +1 / -0

A million people did show up. No president in my lifetime has ever had the people come out and support him like that, and this was after the first term when the luster usually wears off

0
TowerLake 0 points ago +1 / -1

No. A million didn’t show up. There were a lot but it was at best 100 thousand.

1
Pirate_Lafitte 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure the capitol police estimated the total crowd at one million

1
TowerLake 1 point ago +1 / -0

No the capital police did not do that.

12
Strike_Eagle784 12 points ago +12 / -0

Would anyone be able to tell me who this patriot, Matt Braynard is? Keep seeing his name come up around here, is he some sort of statistician?

12
Doc_Liberty [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

From his Twitter:

"Executive Director of Look Ahead America. Former Data Chief and Strategist for Trump for President"

7
Strike_Eagle784 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thank you! So he has a good connection the President, which is great.

10
Iranhasnukes 10 points ago +10 / -0

He data genius that got trump elected the first time - worked with trump/Bannon in 2016

5
Strike_Eagle784 5 points ago +5 / -0

Cool stuff, thank you for the info!

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
5
f_bastiat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Im not sure about the legality of using a PO Box but I had an address at a UPS store for a short time in-between apartments because I didn't want to keep changing my address. There or lots of situations where companies won't accept a PO Box and UPS offers their physical address and the box number is kind of like an apartment number. I would assume it's legal tbh so I'm interested why he thinks all these are nefarious.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
1
grunt2pog 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what I'm most curious about. On the registrations, there's two sections involving address: 2 and 3.

Section 2 requires the address you use is your actual residence. Section 3 is the address you want your ballot mailed to. I'd like to know if:

  1. Section 3 allows for PO Boxes (it appears it does, but not clear that it doesn't)
  2. Which section is his data using? Section 2 or section 3?
1
f_bastiat 1 point ago +2 / -1

I definitely agree it opens up for more fraud, and my personal experience was with UPS not USPS. Playing devils advocate though I'm wondering if using a UPS for FEDEX store is a loophole because it is a physical street address, and its been a while but if I'm not mistaken I had to give a home address when I signed up for it, and I think I just gave the address I had before I moved out.

Something else that could have been done in nursing homes is they could have given them a fake ballot to fill out, got their signature, and then just filled out the real one and copied over the signature. Would only be detectable if they asked the people who they voted for and it was different than who their vote was cast for, though I don't know what level of detail those databases go into.

3
Violet 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s not a loophole. The GA voting rules specifically disallow use of PO Boxes.

What’s more, the majority of the examples Braynard found willfully misrepresented “PO BOX” as “APT #” or “UNIT.”

Which is obvious fraud.

6
MakeAmericaLegendary 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think for voting you have to have a permanent address.

2
f_bastiat 2 points ago +3 / -1

I would think that would be unconstitutional because if someone is homeless for any reason, it would disenfranchise them. He must know something we don't know, maybe multiple people using the same boxes. I remember this year there was a mayoral candidate in Texas that got arrested for requesting around100 ballots to one of these boxes.

https://www.newsweek.com/texas-dem-mayoral-candidate-charged-voter-fraud-after-allegedly-applying-84-mail-ballots-1538644

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
1
f_bastiat 1 point ago +2 / -1

I wasn't saying disallowing PO Box disenfranchises people, I was saying not allowing someone to vote because they don't have an address does, if the form gives instructions for homeless people than that settles it. Again, I am just trying to understand what Matt is arguing and what the rebuttals are going to be. If the form in these states clear says no PO Boxes, and people used PO Boxes, then those votes should be disqualified.

1
ThePantsParty 1 point ago +1 / -0

The bigger problem here is that even though that's clearly true, the ballots are not attached to the registration now. The whole point of secret ballots is that no one can know how you voted.

So the ONLY recourse would be the throw out the entire election because of the people that registered with a PO Box. Judging by the stances the courts have taken up to this point, that seems like an extraordinarily unlikely outcome to achieve, whether we think it should or not.

2
ThePowerOfPrayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, it is illegal in Georgia.

If you're homeless, you can list a P.O. Box as the address you'd like your ballot mailed to (so no reason to try disguising the P.O. Box as an apartment number either), but you need to list a shelter as your primary address.

2
MakeAmericaLegendary 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't have an answer for the constitutionality of it. I'm not sure what the remedy would be.

3
HumbleMemeFarmer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Homeless folks with a PO Box?

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
ENVYNITAZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
5
Doc_Liberty [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good lord, I know. Don't get me started, let's stay focused!

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
FreedomFighter87 3 points ago +3 / -0

BINGO!!!! Over the past decade, I was becoming concerned "could this really be happening" LMAO. nope. not happening. Just a MASSIVE amount of fraud. All the talk about TX going blue from the democrats. Even without dominion, I bet there is a shit ton of fraud over that huge state.

1
RexCollumSilvarum 1 point ago +1 / -0

The media started that narrative years ago so that the fraud they were planning would look more plausible.

6
Judgemccoy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Listen to math and science!! (Unless it benefits trump, Christians, or anything good and pure)

5
MAGAPig 5 points ago +5 / -0

Anybody have a link to data allowing search of GA 2020 voters by address? Without getting into details, I know a guy who owns and manages a number of apartment complexes in GA and let’s just say there was a huge uptick in election related mail to former tenants who are long gone to other states and more alarming, election related mail to people who never lived in the complexes. A patriot with such knowledge would love to cross reference voter data with current rent roster. There’s a huge opening for shenanigans with apartment complexes in big cities.

2
Doc_Liberty [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

No sure, but I think Lin Wood sent out a tweet looking for GA voting issues just yesterday... He might be worth getting in contact with.

4
Maskhole 4 points ago +4 / -0

The world is made up of 1>Finders 2>Minders3>Grinders. We need a shit ton of grinders to explain this excel mindblower to regular folks - and the Supremes.

4
fjobb 4 points ago +4 / -0

"1400 isn't enough to change the election, and everyone knows if you find some fraud, you've found it all. So lets just pretend this is fine" - Leftists who think everyone else is stupid, much like small children who lie to you while you are watching them do something they are not supposed to.

4
GEOTUSMAGA 4 points ago +5 / -1

MATT BRAIN NERD

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
bluetrench 3 points ago +3 / -0 (edited)

If you can go to UPS to pick up your ballot, why can't you go to the polls to cast your ballot in-person?

3
OhWellian 3 points ago +3 / -0

And the talking heads will still say there's no evidence. Imagine the chagrin when the election is overturned. And by chagrin, I mean never-ending violence.

3
brian4r 3 points ago +4 / -1

Everything else is hearsay, a lot it together 'may' hold some water. But, this, THIS is 100% PROOF. Matt is/was on Trumps team so I know they'll be celebrating tonight!

2
Doc_Liberty [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

COLD, HARD NUMBERS YA COMMIE BASTARDS.

1
brian4r 1 point ago +2 / -1

Fuckin A right.

3
Catfacehorsecivilian 3 points ago +3 / -0

No brakes baby! Numbers don't lie, no matter how much the left wants you to believe 2+2=5.

3
pxmose 3 points ago +3 / -0

what a friggn' shit show...

3
brainphreeze 3 points ago +3 / -0

Awesome, so this will be the total of his findings (so far)?

3
OhShnigums 3 points ago +3 / -0

Need to see this asap

2
Doc_Liberty [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm very interested in reading the white paper... this is what we need. Cold, hard numbers and capable people presenting it to the public (and the courts very soon)

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
remember1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

They literally made up some random shit to mass produce ballots. Pet names, obituaries, you name it.

3
Doc_Liberty [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's going to get all these ballots tossed out! GA law does NOT allow using PO box addresses to request absentee ballots.

https://twitter.com/MattBraynard/status/1331323676474617857?s=20

3
4moreyears 3 points ago +3 / -0

Everyone who committed voter fraud needs to be charged, prosecuted, fined, and jailed.

2
Danny1878 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not all heroes wear capes.

2
Scumbag-reddit 2 points ago +4 / -2

You drumpfsters really can't let go of a coup attempt on a duly elected president. Cope is hard, you should just let the commies take over like normal people.

2
Virtigo31 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
pray4peace4 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amazing.... simply amazing. You know the Democrats are either going to say it's a nothingburger, or a crooked judge is going to say it won't change the election. No matter the outcome, somebody has to pay a price for this & it's not conservatives.

2
Billygoat65 2 points ago +2 / -0

Evidence of fraud.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
herder 2 points ago +2 / -0

Matt is bringing the SAUCE.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
democrats_r_pedos 2 points ago +2 / -0

Edward Soloman has great mathematical analysis also. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIxc8YMkny2KBaD5TQsSbpg

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

Democrats cheated bigely. SAD!

1
KyrosQF 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember, if any statistical findings are nearly impossible, they should be as strong as DNA evidence...because DNA evidence has a higher chance of failure than the statistical probability of some of these situations.

1
Rookie_2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh no! Not his STATISTICAL ANALysis!

Wake up you freaking people!!! There is no loyal Q , tweets change nothing, judges will cower if not straight lefty activist. Never, in history, more heavily armed population was so gullible into inaction.

1
DrunkenChewbacca 1 point ago +1 / -0

What can be done with GA and PA? I know PA certified the votes. Will this be for SCOTUS?

3
MakeAmericaLegendary 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't worry. We have three weeks to convince courts (any court) that the vote was tainted enough to make the winner unclear. The constitutional remedy is to bring it to the House, which is a win condition for us. It may feel like endgame for us, but Thanksgiving is fittingly only half time.

1
DrunkenChewbacca 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes very true. I shall eat my Turkey and toast to Trump!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Factsnlogic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hopefully their names are released and criminal charges are filed

1
Tantalus4200 1 point ago +1 / -0

Getting the goods