122
Comments (26)
sorted by:
15
Anti_Immigration 15 points ago +15 / -0

So they can do nothing with it like on Zimbabwe and South Africa.

9
RememberKosciuszko 9 points ago +9 / -0

Bring back Rhodesia

9
Anti_Immigration 9 points ago +9 / -0

Fun fact, people weren't starving or waging constant War when it was Rhodesia

3
RememberKosciuszko 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even more, it was nicknamed a "breadbasket of Africa", so...

But hey - look at the amount of trillionaires in Zimbabwe! Sure as hell they were doing better than Rhodesia! /obvious s

2
Anti_Immigration 2 points ago +2 / -0

I always like to show them my 100 trillion Zimbabwe note I got off ebay. It actually helps drive the point for some people.

1
RememberKosciuszko 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, I always thought that no one really argued that Zimbabwe was quite weak sequel to Rhodesia

Btw how much did it cost? Didn't have to buy 10 bills for 1 cent?

1
Anti_Immigration 1 point ago +1 / -0

The super high bills are usually around 20 bucks or more for a really good condition ones oh, but you can get like five packs of 50 billion dollar notes for like $9 cash it. I like to get them and hand them out to people

10
slaphappy2 10 points ago +10 / -0

The government buys land and gives it to black people because of skin color.

That's a direct violation of the Civil Rights act of 1964,

Hello AG Barr ? Yoohoo ? Where are you ?

Title VI—nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs Prevents discrimination by programs and activities that receive federal funds. If a recipient of federal funds is found in violation of Title VI, that recipient may lose its federal funding.

General

This title declares it to be the policy of the United States that discrimination on the ground of race, color, or national origin shall not occur in connection with programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance and authorizes and directs the appropriate Federal departments and agencies to take action to carry out this policy.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
FireannDireach 6 points ago +6 / -0

This will never make it out of committee. Big Ag will never let this pass. They own most of the farmland, they're not giving it up willingly.

As much as I'm all for small farmers, this is just socialism, and pandering to blacks they lost this election.

Booker, Warren, Gillibrand

Yeah, this isn't going anywhere. This is grandstanding. That is not a team of Senators who get legislation passed.

2
MaximusDecimusMeridi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Long term....big ag would love to snatch this up piece by piece for Penny's on the dollar

5
LirukDatan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lol, yeah, get them joggers back into the fields!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
somedickinohio 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pocahontas would suddenly reveal her black heritage(and that of her extensive family) to take control of thousands of acres.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Zude 2 points ago +2 / -0

Black people don’t want to farm.

1
jts1 1 point ago +1 / -0

They might be successful with all those "white guilt" folks working for them! Stupid is, stupid does!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
mortymbg13 1 point ago +1 / -0

About 150 years too late on that one Democrats, guess they were having buyers remorse and battle fatigue back then

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
AnointedVisions 1 point ago +1 / -0

South Africa?