You've got to wonder if enforcing the deadline in PA and old rules in Wisconsin and Georgia is the more tame 'Plan A' whereas this is the nuclear option in 'Plan B' where the it works spectacularly, but causes the most Fallout.
I understand their caution and not wanting so much civil unrest, but the country is at stake. If things get too dire, I would definitely pull the trigger on Plan B.
U.S. v Throckmorton, 1878, "Fraud vitiates everything".
This is the ultimate solution
You've got to wonder if enforcing the deadline in PA and old rules in Wisconsin and Georgia is the more tame 'Plan A' whereas this is the nuclear option in 'Plan B' where the it works spectacularly, but causes the most Fallout.
I understand their caution and not wanting so much civil unrest, but the country is at stake. If things get too dire, I would definitely pull the trigger on Plan B.
Why can't states like TX sue to the effect that the voting rights of Texans were violated by fraud in other states?
There is an amicus brief by 10 AGs from other states. Not sure what is going on with it.