Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
Uhh... yeah, that's not true. Many attribute the origins of the word "racist," (though likely incorrectly, at least in some capacity) to Trotsky. He used the word in his writings, dating earliest to 1930, and found in his History of the Russian Revolution. He applied it to Slavophiles, and those who opposed the communist party β though it's application and use here was entirely different from how people, especially Americans, would recognize, understand and/or use the word today. This was, however, potentially the first use of the word with it having a negative connotation. It was used in multiple French publications/authors far earlier in the 20th century, and even found in a late 19th century French article ("raciste" and "racisme"), though lacking negative connotations.
While those are the origins, with negative connotations of the word and term likely having its origins in early communist Russia, it can at least be said that it was later further popularized during, and immediately following, WWII and the Holocaust, so you can at least link, in some capacity, the rise of the usage of the specific term, in a negative light, with antisemtism.
But then, if we focus less on semantics, you can spot the use of the concept of racism as far back as the 17th century. While the word "racism," wasn't specifically used, the term "race" was defined, clarified, and used; and discrimination based on ones race was also often addressed, just not with the word "racism." One example of this would be from Jefferson in 1785, writing in Notes on the State of Virginia:
Deep-rooted prejudices entertained by the Whites; ten thousand recollections, by the Blacks, of the injuries they have sustained; new provocations; the real distinctions which nature has madeβ¦will divide us into parties, and produce convulsions which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race. To these objections, which are political, may be added others, which are physical and moral. The first difference which strikes us is that of colour.
This above example β while predating the specific word "racism" β is exactly how we understand the concept of, and use the word, "racism," today β and so there's a better argument that "racism" has its origins in enlightenment ideals, traditional western thought, and even the origins and formation of the U.S. To attribute the word solely to one group, however, is disingenuous, historically incorrect, and lacks intellectual integrity; ignoring historical context and the general evolution of concepts and their relationship with language and the formation of words entering the general lexicon β as is often the case when attributing any characteristics, ideas, phenomena, and sometimes even actions, to one group, and one group alone; it's akin to, and no better than, when leftists say "all Trump supporters are racist, sexist, fascist, bigots"
It's the equivalent of heretic in the dark age and counter-revolutionary/capitalist dog in Soviet Union. It's the exact same kind of lable in substance. Any dissenter is labeled, silenced and persecuted. It has nothing to do with race.
When communism finally gets its throat slit, Buzzfeed propagandists should be permitted to blog live from the gallows, as they each wait for their moment, all the way until the floor drops out. I would love to read those blog posts and "tweets".
We love our permanently-tanned Americans! But because you are a conservative, Joe Biden has declared you a Caucasian. I'm not sure you can continue to issue N-word passes as a new white man.
Semi-related but a few years ago when I was in the dating scene (currently single now but not ready to jump back in), I would use this as a litmus test. I met up with this guy I knew on an acquaintance level just to casually hang out/get to know each other. Idk how it came up in conversation but I asked if he was offended by the "N-word". He became really passionate and almost hyper and answered "Nigg-A is fine but hard R? No way!! No one should be allowed to say that! Nigg-UH is fine! No Hard R!" while kind of flailing his arms around. He wasn't mad I asked, he was just REALLY pumped to answer.
And that was the last time we hung out. Granted, it's not that I say the ~N-word~ on a consistent basis but like...jesus, man. I understand when it's used in an insulting manner but I refuse to have any kind of intimate (not just physically) relationship with anyone who gets offended by a word, no matter the context/intent. There's also something not very manly about a man getting offended by the mere existence of a word, lol.
Lol Iβve said before there needs to be a some kind of dating ~thing~ on here. Itβd be very convenient. You couldnβt pay me to date someone on the left, haha.
PK is an animal. We need more of him on our side. He said yesterday we had confiscated some of the voting machines for "investigation" purposes. Bannon was pushing for more info, but he stated he couldn't say any more than that.
Have been posting elsewhere on this board about Phil Kline, he is legitimate and a former state AG, I believe for Kansas. Have listened to him on War Room Pandemic and have been impressed. Not knocking Rudy, but Phil Kline and David Kallman are the silent workhorses, who I think are going to get this done in Wisconsin and Michigan respectively.
Yes, he's a former prosecutor, too, He's successfully tried murder cases in Kansas City, KS and he knows a thing or two about securing evidence before trial.
You are of course ultimately right. However, even in poly sci classes I took 20 years ago, professors mentioned that Kennedy might have stolen the election from Nixon with the help of the Dem machine in big cities. I've also heard it mentioned on programs mentioned on the History [sic] Channel...so I assume there is some knowledge of this among the general population...oh well.
People forget easily.
Remember, the MSM spent 2015 telling normies elections can't be rigged. Then suddenly when Trump won, spent the next 4 years telling us the 2016 election was rigged by Russia. Then on November 3rd, when Biden was projected the winner, switched back to elections can't be rigged. Fraud doesn't exist.
The "normies" should have immediately been like "Hey.... wait a minute...." but they didn't. They'll not only believe contradictory statements from one day to the next, they believe contradictory statements at the same time.
Hitler once said "What luck for rulers men do not think."
Educate the populace. Fix the messed up primary school systems. Teach problem solving through math and sciences. Force them to be in person so students learn social skills. No more participation awards. Yes, your kid can fail. It will build character.
Kind of unrelated: end federally funded higher education. Let them sort out their costs properly and nix the worthless degrees.
I also do not want to pay for their bullshit research with my tax dollars. They treat it as free money. They can get fucked and learn some business skills.
Defund higher education to stop indoctrination first. Then move on primary schools to get rid of common core. Everything should be merit based. Retarded kid? Goes with the other retards. So forth.
Our media has snowed them so long into believing that it doesn't actually occur, or that it doesn't change the numbers "more than a percent" when it does.
Can we stop calling it state scotus please? The 'us' in scotus stands for united states. This is not the Wisconsin Supreme Court of the United States, its simply the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Sorry, pet peeve!
Yeah, I think for once during his presidency, his team that has his back is being honest with him and asking him to keep pretty quiet/hush and let them do their job. I love'em to death, but it is true (imo) that in some instances might be best he let someone else do some work and chill out, before he says something that might make it harder for them to win. He's smart, he knows leashing himself in this instance is best for the People.
The other aspect of this is that the media is chomping at the bit to lay all of the voter fraud theories directly at his feet and rely on their audienceβs personal animus toward Trump. The more he lets his legal team handle it, the harder it is to chalk it all up to Orange Man Bad
It's hard to tell. Wisconsin has appointed judges and then they're ratified in a non-partisan election. However, Scott Walker did appoint a lot of then and they appear based. As a barometer for whether a judge is on the side of liberty or tyranny, I look at how they've ruled on coronachan, because the lockdowns, like the election fraud, are attempts to violate the civil rights of American citizens. In the case of the Wisconsin supreme court, they ordered all of Gov. Tony Evers communist lockdown orders lifted. Of course the left fags are all blaming them for coronachan in Wisconsin. And giving them 1 star google reviews. Let's show them some love pedes!
Bingo, that video that lady took, will alone probably impact the election more than that entire Hunter laptop shit, unless there's some mega fucking bombshell I missed.
Next it will be, "Trump cheated too. We have two affidavits from known liars that say the voted for Biden and they weren't counted. So since both sides cheated we should just accept the results as is."
The whole point of the fraud is that it's not widespread. If you spread it out across the nation it wouldn't be enough to flip any states. If you spread it out across the states it would be too hard to manage. You concentrate it in a few key counties that you have under very strong control.
They used blitzkreig tactics. Concentration of force rather than spreading yourself thin.
I believe any absentee that had discrepancies such as the signature not matching the envelope or the envelope info clearly filled in by a clerk rather than the voter
There has been a recount going for about a week now. There's actually a few people on this site that are participating in it, and they reported they are objecting to tons of ballots because of these discrepancies. They said the ballots they object to are being segregated and the lawyers will build a case on these illegal ballots
I've been following the recount, but that would imply that they've contested 150k ballots and that this group is filing something in response. I'm more than willing to leap for joy if that's true, but it doesn't seem to be correlated with the recount.
Just heard on the radio this morning they have only found a "few" votes during the recount. This was conservative radio. Always saying no signs of fraud. I am in Green Bay WI
Statistical analysis indicates that nearly 100,000 persons who exploited this exemption to cast absentee ballots were not actually indefinitely confined on Election Day, meaning they should not have been eligible to vote.
Have they shared their methodology anywhere? I'm not doubting because I think Braynard et al are very thorough but this just doesn't spell anything out. I think they are saying "statistical analysis" to just mean that they derived an estimate from a small sample of raw evidence. In some of these cases the raw evidence is clear what it would be ; e.g. they called a registered Republican who according to the rolls voted as Indefinitely Confined, but on the phone absolutely denies that they did such a thing. Then extrapolate the frequency of such cases to the whole state or whole districts. But-- what about this "not actually indefinitely confined" case? Is the raw evidence consisting of supposedly Indefinitely Confined voters on the rolls, whose public social media profiles were tracked down and seen to demonstrate that the person was clearly not confined? I know there have been a few such cases reported. But it is labor intensive to find these. So how many base raw/proven examples do they have, and to how large a population did they statistically extrapolate to? Braynard said he was coming out with a whitepaper, hopefully he spells it out.
Court will rule every fraudulent vote must be counted otherwise it disenfranchises those who are dead, donβt live in the state or who are not citizens.
Father in Heaven please bless all the people who have brought this petition that these 150,000 fraudulent votes are taken away from Joe Biden in the name of Jesus Christ Amen. Thank you Father.
I hoping these cheating bastards have more than they can handle in trying to defeat these lawsuits and they should just keep coming until the system is fixed.
So when, eventually, we get proven right about all this and Joepedo isn't crowned king of the world in January, how do we think the normies are going to handle it coming completely out of left field for them?
Think about it, unless you're engaged with this site or a relative handful of others, you have no idea this fight is even happening. What a shocker.
Was some of that money earmarked for corrupted poll workers / teachers? The NEA and teachers union endorsed Biden. Also Democrat Gov Tony Evers previously served as the Wisconsin Superintendent of Public Instruction. Did they rig it in Wisconsin through the education bureaucracy?
Wisconsin was the first state to swing in Bidens favor after the counting freeze and that is not a coincidence. Pelosi had just stated a few weeks prior that the entire election was "riding on Wisconsin" while earlier in the year Joe Biden shilled for a blatantly rigged referendum in Wisconsin? And the person in control of the money allocated by that referendum is Bill Clintons Wisconsin Campaign manager??
...Then Wisconsin is the first state in a series of "miraculous" comebacks for Biden??? Fishy.
The same technology that Bill Gates wants to use to track everyone's vaccination history (see ID2020) can now be used to "secure" our elections by tracking everyone's vote with an "anonymous" digital ID tied to their person. This election crisis was perpetrated to implement an agenda that is starting to look an awful lot like the Mark of the Beast.
Not one state not one county not one city not one precinct not one small town not ONE PLACE has voter fraud in favor of Trump. Not a single one. They all favor Joe Biden. And not ONE person is locked away in a jail cell.
You can't use that word! Only we can use that word...rigger please!
What about rigga?
It's really amusing that sites like Buzzfeed & Slate think we're actually referring to black people by making fun of the incidental rhyming π€£
Only a true racist sees race in everything
I've always said "If you're hearing the dog whistle, you might be the dog."
That's very good. Can I use that phrase?
Uhh... yeah, that's not true. Many attribute the origins of the word "racist," (though likely incorrectly, at least in some capacity) to Trotsky. He used the word in his writings, dating earliest to 1930, and found in his History of the Russian Revolution. He applied it to Slavophiles, and those who opposed the communist party β though it's application and use here was entirely different from how people, especially Americans, would recognize, understand and/or use the word today. This was, however, potentially the first use of the word with it having a negative connotation. It was used in multiple French publications/authors far earlier in the 20th century, and even found in a late 19th century French article ("raciste" and "racisme"), though lacking negative connotations.
While those are the origins, with negative connotations of the word and term likely having its origins in early communist Russia, it can at least be said that it was later further popularized during, and immediately following, WWII and the Holocaust, so you can at least link, in some capacity, the rise of the usage of the specific term, in a negative light, with antisemtism.
But then, if we focus less on semantics, you can spot the use of the concept of racism as far back as the 17th century. While the word "racism," wasn't specifically used, the term "race" was defined, clarified, and used; and discrimination based on ones race was also often addressed, just not with the word "racism." One example of this would be from Jefferson in 1785, writing in Notes on the State of Virginia:
This above example β while predating the specific word "racism" β is exactly how we understand the concept of, and use the word, "racism," today β and so there's a better argument that "racism" has its origins in enlightenment ideals, traditional western thought, and even the origins and formation of the U.S. To attribute the word solely to one group, however, is disingenuous, historically incorrect, and lacks intellectual integrity; ignoring historical context and the general evolution of concepts and their relationship with language and the formation of words entering the general lexicon β as is often the case when attributing any characteristics, ideas, phenomena, and sometimes even actions, to one group, and one group alone; it's akin to, and no better than, when leftists say "all Trump supporters are racist, sexist, fascist, bigots"
It's the equivalent of heretic in the dark age and counter-revolutionary/capitalist dog in Soviet Union. It's the exact same kind of lable in substance. Any dissenter is labeled, silenced and persecuted. It has nothing to do with race.
Hoky triggered Communists batman!
When communism finally gets its throat slit, Buzzfeed propagandists should be permitted to blog live from the gallows, as they each wait for their moment, all the way until the floor drops out. I would love to read those blog posts and "tweets".
We love our permanently-tanned Americans! But because you are a conservative, Joe Biden has declared you a Caucasian. I'm not sure you can continue to issue N-word passes as a new white man.
I'm not white, I'm a melaninly disadvantaged American.
My nigga!
Name checks out. Carry on Sir.
Oh damnit don't give them that. These crazy bastards will start doing Chapelle quotes again
I just watched Airplane for the first time like a month ago.
I picked a hell of a week to stop sniffing glue.
Make sure you watch "Soul Plane"?
Excuse me... I speak jive.
https://youtu.be/RrZlWw8Di10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrZlWw8Di10
R-I-G-G-E-R itβs the Rigger family!
https://youtu.be/utrvNbTpHSA
thanks mah neighbor
Must not be many in Alaska. That's what.
Iβm sorry that my owner became cucked. I thought I was on the neck of a man. Just know, Iβm not a cuck, Iβm still based and redpilled.
Youβre probably just a clip on
Iβm not a child, Iβm an adult Donald J. Trump Collection tie. Although, my son is a clip-on.
We have riggers here. Our Lt. Governor is doing an audit on the last election due to some concerns over a ballot proposal that was successful.
I wish your username was CuckerTarlson - but I like this one too :)
Don't wanna disenfranchise all the patriotic Tarlsons out there!
Semi-related but a few years ago when I was in the dating scene (currently single now but not ready to jump back in), I would use this as a litmus test. I met up with this guy I knew on an acquaintance level just to casually hang out/get to know each other. Idk how it came up in conversation but I asked if he was offended by the "N-word". He became really passionate and almost hyper and answered "Nigg-A is fine but hard R? No way!! No one should be allowed to say that! Nigg-UH is fine! No Hard R!" while kind of flailing his arms around. He wasn't mad I asked, he was just REALLY pumped to answer.
And that was the last time we hung out. Granted, it's not that I say the ~N-word~ on a consistent basis but like...jesus, man. I understand when it's used in an insulting manner but I refuse to have any kind of intimate (not just physically) relationship with anyone who gets offended by a word, no matter the context/intent. There's also something not very manly about a man getting offended by the mere existence of a word, lol.
If you're ready to get back into the dating pool, this is absolutely the right website to find a based partner.
Lol Iβve said before there needs to be a some kind of dating ~thing~ on here. Itβd be very convenient. You couldnβt pay me to date someone on the left, haha.
Ok so whatβs this shit about jogga? Joggin is a good thing
Ahmaud Arbery was "jogging" in boots through construction sites that were having a problem with theft.
It's a well known fact that the "hard R" is what makes words racist and evil.
Lololol
My rigga!
riggas gonna rig
You my rigga!
Rigga in the woodpile
New husky chainsaw goes βrun rigga rigga rigga riggaβ
I think you mean rigga, or rigguh?
Right rigga please!
No no - it's RIGOR - as in mortis
I cheated in a friendly poker game once, therefore making me a Rigger and granting me a permanent R-word pass. Don't gatekeep me, riggaphobe
Despite making up only 13% of the population riggers make up 50% of the rigging.
half of me just grabbed some cord...
i have some splainin to do
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8I16Xk7YQyw
Phill Fucking Kline!! Keep up the outstanding work, patriot!!
PK is an animal. We need more of him on our side. He said yesterday we had confiscated some of the voting machines for "investigation" purposes. Bannon was pushing for more info, but he stated he couldn't say any more than that.
Finally, SOMEONE with balls in a position to do the right thing.
Let's hope so, that article is light on details.
Edit: found more info downthread.
https://got-freedom.org/2020/11/24/amistad-project-files-litigation-calling-more-than-150000-wisconsin-ballots-into-question/
See here for the petition if youβre interested. 45 pages but worth it I think.
He told Bannon yesterday that law enforcement has taken custody of some voting machines. He said he couldn't provide any other specifics.
I hope it's not federal law enforcement. It's probably getting "bleached".
Wiped like with a cloth? *Cue death cackle
Have been posting elsewhere on this board about Phil Kline, he is legitimate and a former state AG, I believe for Kansas. Have listened to him on War Room Pandemic and have been impressed. Not knocking Rudy, but Phil Kline and David Kallman are the silent workhorses, who I think are going to get this done in Wisconsin and Michigan respectively.
Yes, he's a former prosecutor, too, He's successfully tried murder cases in Kansas City, KS and he knows a thing or two about securing evidence before trial.
Don't normies see how every time there is voter fraud, it benefits Democrats only?
They don't because our media tells them otherwise.
You are of course ultimately right. However, even in poly sci classes I took 20 years ago, professors mentioned that Kennedy might have stolen the election from Nixon with the help of the Dem machine in big cities. I've also heard it mentioned on programs mentioned on the History [sic] Channel...so I assume there is some knowledge of this among the general population...oh well.
People forget easily. Remember, the MSM spent 2015 telling normies elections can't be rigged. Then suddenly when Trump won, spent the next 4 years telling us the 2016 election was rigged by Russia. Then on November 3rd, when Biden was projected the winner, switched back to elections can't be rigged. Fraud doesn't exist.
The "normies" should have immediately been like "Hey.... wait a minute...." but they didn't. They'll not only believe contradictory statements from one day to the next, they believe contradictory statements at the same time.
Hitler once said "What luck for rulers men do not think."
Most people are sheep which will gladly follow whichever authority figures they feel everyone else is following to be part of the herd.
Yo the media is a problem for real.. Is there anything that can be done about these faggots? Can somebody break these fuckers up or what?
Educate the populace. Fix the messed up primary school systems. Teach problem solving through math and sciences. Force them to be in person so students learn social skills. No more participation awards. Yes, your kid can fail. It will build character.
Kind of unrelated: end federally funded higher education. Let them sort out their costs properly and nix the worthless degrees.
I also do not want to pay for their bullshit research with my tax dollars. They treat it as free money. They can get fucked and learn some business skills.
So nothing will be done then, that sucks
Defund higher education to stop indoctrination first. Then move on primary schools to get rid of common core. Everything should be merit based. Retarded kid? Goes with the other retards. So forth.
So once again, nothing will happen. If you actually believe what you said is going to happen, you might be the retarted one here, kid.
They said the same thing about electing Trump. Get on the train or stfu.
We don't you need this new influx of do nothing losers. Go back to the RINOs, they're calling.
Our media has snowed them so long into believing that it doesn't actually occur, or that it doesn't change the numbers "more than a percent" when it does.
Normies don't see it because they are lied to, but they are also getting pressure from radical Leftests who straight up don't care about fraud.
To the Lefties, its "no matter the cost" and so the destruction of liberty is a fair price for them to win. Its evil.
Made a 100$ bet with a buddy that more fraudulent votes would be uncovered for Biden than for POTUS. Thatβs how far gone they are.
Should have bet more
That was on top of $500 that POTUS would be inaugurated Jan 20 and not Biden. Sort of the same bet, thatβs how mushbrained they are.
Shit I bet an Independent buddy of mine $40 Trump will be inaugurated. Lotta people sleeping. He thinks it is easy money for him haha
Have democrats claimed there have been any fraudulent ballots for Trump? Wouldnβt that go against their whole narrative of there was no cheating?
Seems like itβs hundreds of thousands, if not multiple millions, to zero. Lmaoooo
RINO's do it too so they point at them to say both sides do it.
They don't care as long as they win because orange man bad is a threat to their democracy.
Says the people who want to end democracy!
Hopefully no cuck judge
If there is wouldn't it go to SCOTUS?
They filed with State Supreme Court first, but can appealed to federal courts if need be.
This is NOT a trump campaign lawsuit btw.
Can we stop calling it state scotus please? The 'us' in scotus stands for united states. This is not the Wisconsin Supreme Court of the United States, its simply the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Sorry, pet peeve!
Yeah, I think for once during his presidency, his team that has his back is being honest with him and asking him to keep pretty quiet/hush and let them do their job. I love'em to death, but it is true (imo) that in some instances might be best he let someone else do some work and chill out, before he says something that might make it harder for them to win. He's smart, he knows leashing himself in this instance is best for the People.
The other aspect of this is that the media is chomping at the bit to lay all of the voter fraud theories directly at his feet and rely on their audienceβs personal animus toward Trump. The more he lets his legal team handle it, the harder it is to chalk it all up to Orange Man Bad
Youβre right. I messed up. I mean state Supreme Court
So it's ScotWis then or is Wiscot better?
SCOW.
SCOWI
this is a good clarification
Scotus can't take every case, you know. They only take a couple hundred per year
TBH all other cases should be shoved aside until at MINIMUM Dec. 14th, ideally until Jan 20th.
They will likely consolidate the election cases.
This isnβt some case on some obscure regulation. Itβs a Presidential election. They know they have to weigh in
But I mean canβt/ shouldnβt the make an exception considering this involves our Presidential election?
It's hard to tell. Wisconsin has appointed judges and then they're ratified in a non-partisan election. However, Scott Walker did appoint a lot of then and they appear based. As a barometer for whether a judge is on the side of liberty or tyranny, I look at how they've ruled on coronachan, because the lockdowns, like the election fraud, are attempts to violate the civil rights of American citizens. In the case of the Wisconsin supreme court, they ordered all of Gov. Tony Evers communist lockdown orders lifted. Of course the left fags are all blaming them for coronachan in Wisconsin. And giving them 1 star google reviews. Let's show them some love pedes!
ReviewYourJudge.com
"Coronachan" lmfao
State Supreme Court in Wisconsin is decently based. I'd say 60/40 - 70/30 they don't cuck out.
Props to the mods for sticking important stuff. Rudy, Sidney, Lin and Co. need our autistic help.
Yep. This is that high-energy shit I need
Bingo, that video that lady took, will alone probably impact the election more than that entire Hunter laptop shit, unless there's some mega fucking bombshell I missed.
ππ
πΈπ
150K? Holy....
"Not widespread fraud." has been the mantra pushed by all networks since the day after the election.
Why am I not 150,000 ahead!
Bringing back the old memes. Memeception!
They were right it wasn't widespread. It was targeted and deep.
Next it will be, "Trump cheated too. We have two affidavits from known liars that say the voted for Biden and they weren't counted. So since both sides cheated we should just accept the results as is."
The whole point of the fraud is that it's not widespread. If you spread it out across the nation it wouldn't be enough to flip any states. If you spread it out across the states it would be too hard to manage. You concentrate it in a few key counties that you have under very strong control.
They used blitzkreig tactics. Concentration of force rather than spreading yourself thin.
Hi Jim.
Tbh thatβs a fair bit. Good for a 3-5% win
Biden's lead is 20,000
150,000? Um this is considered widespread fraud? No itβs not -Libs
Was this found during the recount in WI?
Better info than op
How were these identified? How are they classifying them, and what are the legal steps being taken?
I believe any absentee that had discrepancies such as the signature not matching the envelope or the envelope info clearly filled in by a clerk rather than the voter
How did they have access to these?
There has been a recount going for about a week now. There's actually a few people on this site that are participating in it, and they reported they are objecting to tons of ballots because of these discrepancies. They said the ballots they object to are being segregated and the lawyers will build a case on these illegal ballots
I've been following the recount, but that would imply that they've contested 150k ballots and that this group is filing something in response. I'm more than willing to leap for joy if that's true, but it doesn't seem to be correlated with the recount.
It could very well be extrapolation. If we assume the votes are reasonably shuffled, this is a reasonable thing to do.
indeed 150k is a lot. But think about it... how many ppl never practice their signatures? I for sure don't
Just heard on the radio this morning they have only found a "few" votes during the recount. This was conservative radio. Always saying no signs of fraud. I am in Green Bay WI
fraud is one thing, but disqualified votes is another
Oh wow so theyβre actually allowed to do their job of challenging the ballots! Color me surprised
More info here https://got-freedom.org/2020/11/24/amistad-project-files-litigation-calling-more-than-150000-wisconsin-ballots-into-question/
Have they shared their methodology anywhere? I'm not doubting because I think Braynard et al are very thorough but this just doesn't spell anything out. I think they are saying "statistical analysis" to just mean that they derived an estimate from a small sample of raw evidence. In some of these cases the raw evidence is clear what it would be ; e.g. they called a registered Republican who according to the rolls voted as Indefinitely Confined, but on the phone absolutely denies that they did such a thing. Then extrapolate the frequency of such cases to the whole state or whole districts. But-- what about this "not actually indefinitely confined" case? Is the raw evidence consisting of supposedly Indefinitely Confined voters on the rolls, whose public social media profiles were tracked down and seen to demonstrate that the person was clearly not confined? I know there have been a few such cases reported. But it is labor intensive to find these. So how many base raw/proven examples do they have, and to how large a population did they statistically extrapolate to? Braynard said he was coming out with a whitepaper, hopefully he spells it out.
Exactly what I was looking for; thank you!
Any idea whether there's litigation coming from this or whether they'll wait until after the recount?
The comment above from the got-freedom.org site is a pretty good summary.
Relevant interview yesterday, Phil Kline on Bannon discussing the evidence:
https://youtu.be/FmbTwFhS6Rk?t=4798
Hey thanks for that it's very appreciated.
Here is more specific info on the fraudulent ballots from the Amistad Project themselves https://got-freedom.org/2020/11/24/amistad-project-files-litigation-calling-more-than-150000-wisconsin-ballots-into-question/
Should have submitted this as the link directly, way better than the JTN summary
Yeah I know it is a better one. I found it after I submitted the first one already. Oh well.
Court will rule every fraudulent vote must be counted otherwise it disenfranchises those who are dead, donβt live in the state or who are not citizens.
Father in Heaven please bless all the people who have brought this petition that these 150,000 fraudulent votes are taken away from Joe Biden in the name of Jesus Christ Amen. Thank you Father.
AWESOME!
I hoping these cheating bastards have more than they can handle in trying to defeat these lawsuits and they should just keep coming until the system is fixed.
I fucking hate it when "news" sites throw out big issues like this with zero detail.
There is nothi g here more than a headline.
Where/how did they find the ballots!?
I have no doubt the fraud is there but I would like to have some bit of detail to decide if this worth getting excited over or not.
More info here https://got-freedom.org/2020/11/24/amistad-project-files-litigation-calling-more-than-150000-wisconsin-ballots-into-question/
Thank you for this.
THIS is the link that should have been stickied for us to get amped up about!
Sorry. I found this link after I already created the first post.
Day of the Rope is coming for riggers.
βοΈβοΈβοΈπ₯βοΈβοΈβοΈ
π <ββ MAGA π³ π€Έ <ββ Riggers and RINOs
π»π»π»ππππ»
Is anyone shocked at this point? All those that commit voter fraud are traitors to the republic and should be treated as such.
They cheated during the recount of a rigged referendum in Wisconsin that "passed" by 5 votes. Joe Biden personally endorsed this referendum in April of 2020! Then they used the corrupt Wisconsin courts to rubber stamp the fraudulent recount results.
This was a test for the much more serious rigging they were planning for the presidential election in Wisconsin later in the year. The same exact series of events is likely to unfold in Wisconsin during the recount and Trumps court cases.
Is it just a coincidence that the President of Microsoft, who is working on "election security" software called ElectionGuard, grew up in the exact same town where this rigged referendum took place? Is it just a coincidence that they tested the ElectionGuard software in Wisconsin only two months before they rigged the referendum to pass by 5 votes?
That is what we need
More here https://got-freedom.org/2020/11/24/amistad-project-files-litigation-calling-more-than-150000-wisconsin-ballots-into-question/
Biden's alleged lead was only 20,600. Oops!
Wisconsin judge will absolutely toss this out and the SCOTUS will over turn it.
Over turning a good thing?
yes
So when, eventually, we get proven right about all this and Joepedo isn't crowned king of the world in January, how do we think the normies are going to handle it coming completely out of left field for them?
Think about it, unless you're engaged with this site or a relative handful of others, you have no idea this fight is even happening. What a shocker.
My reddit acc is chock full of messages from gloating commiecucks . I want them to eat their words.
They are going to freak out, AntiFa will hit the streets and burn down Dem controlled shitholes.
LOL corruption judge will just toss it out.
Seriously, Dims are probably offering a lot of money to the judge right now. LMAO
I bet these riggas got paid a lot of money to perpetrate this fraud. Now they rigga rich!
Was the election in Wisconsin rigged through the education bureaucracy using money from a rigged referendum that JOE BIDEN shilled for earlier in the year? The referendum, which passed by 5 votes, gave one billion dollars to the Racine school district, but the money is controlled by a private organization run by BILL CLINTONS WISCONSIN CAMPAIGN MANAGER.
Was some of that money earmarked for corrupted poll workers / teachers? The NEA and teachers union endorsed Biden. Also Democrat Gov Tony Evers previously served as the Wisconsin Superintendent of Public Instruction. Did they rig it in Wisconsin through the education bureaucracy?
Wisconsin schools are rife with corruption and pedophilia scandals. By February of 2020 there had already been three WI educators charged with federal sex crimes in 2020 alone, including the superintendent of Altoona. The Wisconsin Public Education Network uses a pedophile logo. Some school districts in Wisconsin even allow incarcerated criminals to teach at school WHILE THEY ARE IN JAIL using work release programs similar to the one Jeffrey Epstein got. It would be extremely easy to use blackmail to control what happens to money allocated to school districts in WI
Wisconsin was the first state to swing in Bidens favor after the counting freeze and that is not a coincidence. Pelosi had just stated a few weeks prior that the entire election was "riding on Wisconsin" while earlier in the year Joe Biden shilled for a blatantly rigged referendum in Wisconsin? And the person in control of the money allocated by that referendum is Bill Clintons Wisconsin Campaign manager??
...Then Wisconsin is the first state in a series of "miraculous" comebacks for Biden??? Fishy.
Even more fishy is the fact that the President of Microsoft, who is working on "election security" software called ElectionGuard, grew up in the exact same town where this rigged referendum took place. Is it just a coincidence that they tested the ElectionGuard software in Wisconsin only two months before they rigged the referendum to pass by 5 votes?
The same technology that Bill Gates wants to use to track everyone's vaccination history (see ID2020) can now be used to "secure" our elections by tracking everyone's vote with an "anonymous" digital ID tied to their person. This election crisis was perpetrated to implement an agenda that is starting to look an awful lot like the Mark of the Beast.
It's absurd that this will kicked on standing. It's amazing that judge created rules like standing only apply to Republican challenges.
Mods are going for the high score on whack-a-shill. Must be over the target!
on Steve Bannon's show, they discussed the fact 8 full tables full of ballots are being disputed just in Milwaukee
Need something to drop, swing, or change so everyone talks about it over thanksgiving.
there's no details. what was fraudulent about these votes and how did they find them?
Not one state not one county not one city not one precinct not one small town not ONE PLACE has voter fraud in favor of Trump. Not a single one. They all favor Joe Biden. And not ONE person is locked away in a jail cell.
Is there another source on this? They don't link the petition in the article.
Try this https://got-freedom.org/2020/11/24/amistad-project-files-litigation-calling-more-than-150000-wisconsin-ballots-into-question/
Thanks I'll use it, this does have more information but still no link to the petition.
most likely voters who did not submit absentee ballot application right? I know that is WI law
A statistical look at likely voter turnout says at least 450K fraudulent ballots were counted in Wisconsin.
1 nice sized win in 3 or 4 states...all we need
this is why they are rushing...they know we have them dead to rights
Yep.
I'm sure there are more than that.
π§ STABLE GENIUS π§
willful violation
woot woot
Any links to documents? I'm archiving.
https://got-freedom.org/2020/11/24/amistad-project-files-litigation-calling-more-than-150000-wisconsin-ballots-into-question/
This is helpful, thank you .
And the MSM coverage of this will be.... zero:
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS2vdJih/no-evidence-nope--none-at-all-ho/c/
πππππ I hope a judge takes this seriously.