8999
Comments (416)
sorted by:
437
CloakAndDagger 437 points ago +444 / -7

RIGGERS GET THE ROPE

250
SoldierofKek 250 points ago +252 / -2

You can't use that word! Only we can use that word...rigger please!

198
What_password 198 points ago +199 / -1

What about rigga?

380
deleted 380 points ago +382 / -2
139
TrumpsBestFriend 139 points ago +140 / -1

It's really amusing that sites like Buzzfeed & Slate think we're actually referring to black people by making fun of the incidental rhyming 🀣

136
ChelseaHubbell 136 points ago +136 / -0

Only a true racist sees race in everything

103
NomadicKrow 103 points ago +103 / -0

I've always said "If you're hearing the dog whistle, you might be the dog."

30
kazimiera 30 points ago +30 / -0

That's very good. Can I use that phrase?

45
deleted 45 points ago +50 / -5
11
I_Used_to_be_me 11 points ago +15 / -4

Uhh... yeah, that's not true. Many attribute the origins of the word "racist," (though likely incorrectly, at least in some capacity) to Trotsky. He used the word in his writings, dating earliest to 1930, and found in his History of the Russian Revolution. He applied it to Slavophiles, and those who opposed the communist party β€” though it's application and use here was entirely different from how people, especially Americans, would recognize, understand and/or use the word today. This was, however, potentially the first use of the word with it having a negative connotation. It was used in multiple French publications/authors far earlier in the 20th century, and even found in a late 19th century French article ("raciste" and "racisme"), though lacking negative connotations.

While those are the origins, with negative connotations of the word and term likely having its origins in early communist Russia, it can at least be said that it was later further popularized during, and immediately following, WWII and the Holocaust, so you can at least link, in some capacity, the rise of the usage of the specific term, in a negative light, with antisemtism.

But then, if we focus less on semantics, you can spot the use of the concept of racism as far back as the 17th century. While the word "racism," wasn't specifically used, the term "race" was defined, clarified, and used; and discrimination based on ones race was also often addressed, just not with the word "racism." One example of this would be from Jefferson in 1785, writing in Notes on the State of Virginia:

Deep-rooted prejudices entertained by the Whites; ten thousand recollections, by the Blacks, of the injuries they have sustained; new provocations; the real distinctions which nature has made…will divide us into parties, and produce convulsions which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race. To these objections, which are political, may be added others, which are physical and moral. The first difference which strikes us is that of colour.

This above example β€” while predating the specific word "racism" β€” is exactly how we understand the concept of, and use the word, "racism," today β€” and so there's a better argument that "racism" has its origins in enlightenment ideals, traditional western thought, and even the origins and formation of the U.S. To attribute the word solely to one group, however, is disingenuous, historically incorrect, and lacks intellectual integrity; ignoring historical context and the general evolution of concepts and their relationship with language and the formation of words entering the general lexicon β€” as is often the case when attributing any characteristics, ideas, phenomena, and sometimes even actions, to one group, and one group alone; it's akin to, and no better than, when leftists say "all Trump supporters are racist, sexist, fascist, bigots"

5
Carry_Your_Name 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's the equivalent of heretic in the dark age and counter-revolutionary/capitalist dog in Soviet Union. It's the exact same kind of lable in substance. Any dissenter is labeled, silenced and persecuted. It has nothing to do with race.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
20
deleted 20 points ago +22 / -2
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
17
kag-2020- 17 points ago +17 / -0

Hoky triggered Communists batman!

6
Dr0neRec0very 6 points ago +8 / -2

When communism finally gets its throat slit, Buzzfeed propagandists should be permitted to blog live from the gallows, as they each wait for their moment, all the way until the floor drops out. I would love to read those blog posts and "tweets".

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
41
lake-koshkonong 41 points ago +41 / -0

We love our permanently-tanned Americans! But because you are a conservative, Joe Biden has declared you a Caucasian. I'm not sure you can continue to issue N-word passes as a new white man.

5
Kojote 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm not white, I'm a melaninly disadvantaged American.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
36
CornPopsCousin 36 points ago +40 / -4

My nigga!

19
deleted 19 points ago +22 / -3
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
AndrewLB 2 points ago +2 / -0

Name checks out. Carry on Sir.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
25
GlacialSpeed 25 points ago +25 / -0

Oh damnit don't give them that. These crazy bastards will start doing Chapelle quotes again

30
deleted 30 points ago +30 / -0
12
Friendly_B 12 points ago +12 / -0

I just watched Airplane for the first time like a month ago.

9
jdovejr 9 points ago +9 / -0

I picked a hell of a week to stop sniffing glue.

5
dieseldummy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Make sure you watch "Soul Plane"?

5
AndrewLB 5 points ago +5 / -0

Excuse me... I speak jive.

https://youtu.be/RrZlWw8Di10

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
The_Spicy_Memes_Chef 7 points ago +7 / -0

R-I-G-G-E-R it’s the Rigger family!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
augustinius 12 points ago +12 / -0

thanks mah neighbor

12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
18
CuckerCarlson 18 points ago +19 / -1

Must not be many in Alaska. That's what.

16
TuckerCarlsonsTie 16 points ago +16 / -0

I’m sorry that my owner became cucked. I thought I was on the neck of a man. Just know, I’m not a cuck, I’m still based and redpilled.

11
SpaceForceMAGA 11 points ago +11 / -0

You’re probably just a clip on

10
TuckerCarlsonsTie 10 points ago +10 / -0

I’m not a child, I’m an adult Donald J. Trump Collection tie. Although, my son is a clip-on.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
Tilethewall2 11 points ago +11 / -0

We have riggers here. Our Lt. Governor is doing an audit on the last election due to some concerns over a ballot proposal that was successful.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
Clandestiny 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wish your username was CuckerTarlson - but I like this one too :)

3
matrik 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't wanna disenfranchise all the patriotic Tarlsons out there!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
Redpillgirlfrommars 7 points ago +8 / -1

Semi-related but a few years ago when I was in the dating scene (currently single now but not ready to jump back in), I would use this as a litmus test. I met up with this guy I knew on an acquaintance level just to casually hang out/get to know each other. Idk how it came up in conversation but I asked if he was offended by the "N-word". He became really passionate and almost hyper and answered "Nigg-A is fine but hard R? No way!! No one should be allowed to say that! Nigg-UH is fine! No Hard R!" while kind of flailing his arms around. He wasn't mad I asked, he was just REALLY pumped to answer.

And that was the last time we hung out. Granted, it's not that I say the ~N-word~ on a consistent basis but like...jesus, man. I understand when it's used in an insulting manner but I refuse to have any kind of intimate (not just physically) relationship with anyone who gets offended by a word, no matter the context/intent. There's also something not very manly about a man getting offended by the mere existence of a word, lol.

2
jomcf 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you're ready to get back into the dating pool, this is absolutely the right website to find a based partner.

3
Redpillgirlfrommars 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol I’ve said before there needs to be a some kind of dating ~thing~ on here. It’d be very convenient. You couldn’t pay me to date someone on the left, haha.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
3
Trumpette1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok so what’s this shit about jogga? Joggin is a good thing

5
BecMonTchew 5 points ago +6 / -1

Ahmaud Arbery was "jogging" in boots through construction sites that were having a problem with theft.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a well known fact that the "hard R" is what makes words racist and evil.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lololol

17
Truglow 17 points ago +18 / -1

My rigga!

11
Ogcarvattack 11 points ago +12 / -1

riggas gonna rig

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
SoldierofKek 7 points ago +8 / -1

You my rigga!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
drsowells1fan 4 points ago +5 / -1

Rigga in the woodpile

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
FaddyMcSaddy 2 points ago +3 / -1

New husky chainsaw goes β€œrun rigga rigga rigga rigga”

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 10 points ago +11 / -1

I think you mean rigga, or rigguh?

4
SoldierofKek 4 points ago +5 / -1

Right rigga please!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
loverat 5 points ago +5 / -0

No no - it's RIGOR - as in mortis

3
CloakAndDagger 3 points ago +3 / -0

I cheated in a friendly poker game once, therefore making me a Rigger and granting me a permanent R-word pass. Don't gatekeep me, riggaphobe

16
Lifted71 16 points ago +16 / -0

Despite making up only 13% of the population riggers make up 50% of the rigging.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
MixedBlacknWhite 5 points ago +6 / -1

half of me just grabbed some cord...

i have some splainin to do

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
190
Pistolgrip 190 points ago +192 / -2

Phill Fucking Kline!! Keep up the outstanding work, patriot!!

83
Andy2020 83 points ago +84 / -1

PK is an animal. We need more of him on our side. He said yesterday we had confiscated some of the voting machines for "investigation" purposes. Bannon was pushing for more info, but he stated he couldn't say any more than that.

35
brickinthewall 35 points ago +35 / -0

Finally, SOMEONE with balls in a position to do the right thing.

11
nasty_pelosi 11 points ago +11 / -0

Let's hope so, that article is light on details.

Edit: found more info downthread.

https://got-freedom.org/2020/11/24/amistad-project-files-litigation-calling-more-than-150000-wisconsin-ballots-into-question/

4
pizza_lawyer 4 points ago +4 / -0

See here for the petition if you’re interested. 45 pages but worth it I think.

23
ontothefuture 23 points ago +23 / -0

He told Bannon yesterday that law enforcement has taken custody of some voting machines. He said he couldn't provide any other specifics.

12
memtndude 12 points ago +13 / -1

I hope it's not federal law enforcement. It's probably getting "bleached".

7
deadbugdale 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wiped like with a cloth? *Cue death cackle

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
16
VA_MAGApede 16 points ago +16 / -0

Have been posting elsewhere on this board about Phil Kline, he is legitimate and a former state AG, I believe for Kansas. Have listened to him on War Room Pandemic and have been impressed. Not knocking Rudy, but Phil Kline and David Kallman are the silent workhorses, who I think are going to get this done in Wisconsin and Michigan respectively.

7
DirtyName 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes, he's a former prosecutor, too, He's successfully tried murder cases in Kansas City, KS and he knows a thing or two about securing evidence before trial.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
178
orthodoxvirginian 178 points ago +180 / -2

Don't normies see how every time there is voter fraud, it benefits Democrats only?

110
EvanOnTheFly 110 points ago +111 / -1

They don't because our media tells them otherwise.

48
orthodoxvirginian 48 points ago +48 / -0

You are of course ultimately right. However, even in poly sci classes I took 20 years ago, professors mentioned that Kennedy might have stolen the election from Nixon with the help of the Dem machine in big cities. I've also heard it mentioned on programs mentioned on the History [sic] Channel...so I assume there is some knowledge of this among the general population...oh well.

16
dookiebot 16 points ago +16 / -0

People forget easily. Remember, the MSM spent 2015 telling normies elections can't be rigged. Then suddenly when Trump won, spent the next 4 years telling us the 2016 election was rigged by Russia. Then on November 3rd, when Biden was projected the winner, switched back to elections can't be rigged. Fraud doesn't exist.

The "normies" should have immediately been like "Hey.... wait a minute...." but they didn't. They'll not only believe contradictory statements from one day to the next, they believe contradictory statements at the same time.

Hitler once said "What luck for rulers men do not think."

2
Rufus_Shinra 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most people are sheep which will gladly follow whichever authority figures they feel everyone else is following to be part of the herd.

5
LIBS_are_LOSERS 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yo the media is a problem for real.. Is there anything that can be done about these faggots? Can somebody break these fuckers up or what?

5
ProgramNerd 5 points ago +6 / -1

Educate the populace. Fix the messed up primary school systems. Teach problem solving through math and sciences. Force them to be in person so students learn social skills. No more participation awards. Yes, your kid can fail. It will build character.

Kind of unrelated: end federally funded higher education. Let them sort out their costs properly and nix the worthless degrees.

I also do not want to pay for their bullshit research with my tax dollars. They treat it as free money. They can get fucked and learn some business skills.

1
latinolizards4trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

So nothing will be done then, that sucks

0
ProgramNerd 0 points ago +1 / -1

Defund higher education to stop indoctrination first. Then move on primary schools to get rid of common core. Everything should be merit based. Retarded kid? Goes with the other retards. So forth.

1
latinolizards4trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

So once again, nothing will happen. If you actually believe what you said is going to happen, you might be the retarted one here, kid.

0
ProgramNerd 0 points ago +1 / -1

They said the same thing about electing Trump. Get on the train or stfu.

We don't you need this new influx of do nothing losers. Go back to the RINOs, they're calling.

1
abetterreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Our media has snowed them so long into believing that it doesn't actually occur, or that it doesn't change the numbers "more than a percent" when it does.

1
veryundude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Normies don't see it because they are lied to, but they are also getting pressure from radical Leftests who straight up don't care about fraud.

To the Lefties, its "no matter the cost" and so the destruction of liberty is a fair price for them to win. Its evil.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
pmurTJdlanoD 12 points ago +12 / -0

Made a 100$ bet with a buddy that more fraudulent votes would be uncovered for Biden than for POTUS. That’s how far gone they are.

2
Kholland65 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should have bet more

5
pmurTJdlanoD 5 points ago +5 / -0

That was on top of $500 that POTUS would be inaugurated Jan 20 and not Biden. Sort of the same bet, that’s how mushbrained they are.

3
deadbugdale 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shit I bet an Independent buddy of mine $40 Trump will be inaugurated. Lotta people sleeping. He thinks it is easy money for him haha

2
LIBS_are_LOSERS 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have democrats claimed there have been any fraudulent ballots for Trump? Wouldn’t that go against their whole narrative of there was no cheating?

Seems like it’s hundreds of thousands, if not multiple millions, to zero. Lmaoooo

10
kag-2020- 10 points ago +10 / -0

RINO's do it too so they point at them to say both sides do it.

3
DongSquad420 3 points ago +3 / -0

They don't care as long as they win because orange man bad is a threat to their democracy.

1
Friendly_B 1 point ago +1 / -0

Says the people who want to end democracy!

104
UpTrump 104 points ago +105 / -1

Hopefully no cuck judge

57
NoahGav 57 points ago +58 / -1

If there is wouldn't it go to SCOTUS?

77
DeplorableWeWin 77 points ago +77 / -0

They filed with State Supreme Court first, but can appealed to federal courts if need be.

This is NOT a trump campaign lawsuit btw.

56
EaglesFanInPhx 56 points ago +56 / -0

Can we stop calling it state scotus please? The 'us' in scotus stands for united states. This is not the Wisconsin Supreme Court of the United States, its simply the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Sorry, pet peeve!

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
A_Discord_Moderator 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, I think for once during his presidency, his team that has his back is being honest with him and asking him to keep pretty quiet/hush and let them do their job. I love'em to death, but it is true (imo) that in some instances might be best he let someone else do some work and chill out, before he says something that might make it harder for them to win. He's smart, he knows leashing himself in this instance is best for the People.

1
CEO_of_Muslims 1 point ago +1 / -0

The other aspect of this is that the media is chomping at the bit to lay all of the voter fraud theories directly at his feet and rely on their audience’s personal animus toward Trump. The more he lets his legal team handle it, the harder it is to chalk it all up to Orange Man Bad

9
DeplorableWeWin 9 points ago +9 / -0

You’re right. I messed up. I mean state Supreme Court

4
SevenThunders 4 points ago +4 / -0

So it's ScotWis then or is Wiscot better?

6
shaven_llama 6 points ago +6 / -0

SCOW.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
sociopathix 1 point ago +1 / -0

SCOWI

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
UpTrump 6 points ago +6 / -0

Scotus can't take every case, you know. They only take a couple hundred per year

14
g00se2k 14 points ago +14 / -0

TBH all other cases should be shoved aside until at MINIMUM Dec. 14th, ideally until Jan 20th.

2
Texas_Rangers 2 points ago +2 / -0

They will likely consolidate the election cases.

This isn’t some case on some obscure regulation. It’s a Presidential election. They know they have to weigh in

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 1 point ago +1 / -0

But I mean can’t/ shouldn’t the make an exception considering this involves our Presidential election?

24
SoldierofKek 24 points ago +24 / -0

It's hard to tell. Wisconsin has appointed judges and then they're ratified in a non-partisan election. However, Scott Walker did appoint a lot of then and they appear based. As a barometer for whether a judge is on the side of liberty or tyranny, I look at how they've ruled on coronachan, because the lockdowns, like the election fraud, are attempts to violate the civil rights of American citizens. In the case of the Wisconsin supreme court, they ordered all of Gov. Tony Evers communist lockdown orders lifted. Of course the left fags are all blaming them for coronachan in Wisconsin. And giving them 1 star google reviews. Let's show them some love pedes!

5
acasper 5 points ago +6 / -1

ReviewYourJudge.com

2
TheTrooper424 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Coronachan" lmfao

2
LordScatmanJohn 2 points ago +2 / -0

State Supreme Court in Wisconsin is decently based. I'd say 60/40 - 70/30 they don't cuck out.

75
twoscoopspatriot 75 points ago +76 / -1

Props to the mods for sticking important stuff. Rudy, Sidney, Lin and Co. need our autistic help.

19
Doc_Liberty 19 points ago +20 / -1

Yep. This is that high-energy shit I need

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
Anon_Army 5 points ago +5 / -0

Bingo, that video that lady took, will alone probably impact the election more than that entire Hunter laptop shit, unless there's some mega fucking bombshell I missed.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
73
Mrsattorney 73 points ago +75 / -2

πŸ‘πŸ‘

8
Jimmy_Russler 8 points ago +9 / -1

πŸΈπŸ‘Œ

41
Doc_Liberty 41 points ago +42 / -1

150K? Holy....

29
deleted 29 points ago +30 / -1
21
2Fangz 21 points ago +21 / -0

"Not widespread fraud." has been the mantra pushed by all networks since the day after the election.

10
FaddyMcSaddy 10 points ago +10 / -0

Why am I not 150,000 ahead!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
pepe_patriot_1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bringing back the old memes. Memeception!

3
S2Slayer 3 points ago +3 / -0

They were right it wasn't widespread. It was targeted and deep.

2
CornandSoybeans 2 points ago +2 / -0

Next it will be, "Trump cheated too. We have two affidavits from known liars that say the voted for Biden and they weren't counted. So since both sides cheated we should just accept the results as is."

1
fusreedah 1 point ago +1 / -0

The whole point of the fraud is that it's not widespread. If you spread it out across the nation it wouldn't be enough to flip any states. If you spread it out across the states it would be too hard to manage. You concentrate it in a few key counties that you have under very strong control.

They used blitzkreig tactics. Concentration of force rather than spreading yourself thin.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Danny1878 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hi Jim.

1
ConfiscateTheCoats 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tbh that’s a fair bit. Good for a 3-5% win

2
josiborg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biden's lead is 20,000

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
spread_em 1 point ago +1 / -0

150,000? Um this is considered widespread fraud? No it’s not -Libs

36
Strike_Eagle784 36 points ago +37 / -1

Was this found during the recount in WI?

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
2
Rychus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Better info than op

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
25
MakeAmericaLegendary 25 points ago +26 / -1

How were these identified? How are they classifying them, and what are the legal steps being taken?

22
pithys 22 points ago +22 / -0

I believe any absentee that had discrepancies such as the signature not matching the envelope or the envelope info clearly filled in by a clerk rather than the voter

10
MakeAmericaLegendary 10 points ago +10 / -0

How did they have access to these?

28
pithys 28 points ago +29 / -1

There has been a recount going for about a week now. There's actually a few people on this site that are participating in it, and they reported they are objecting to tons of ballots because of these discrepancies. They said the ballots they object to are being segregated and the lawyers will build a case on these illegal ballots

8
MakeAmericaLegendary 8 points ago +10 / -2

I've been following the recount, but that would imply that they've contested 150k ballots and that this group is filing something in response. I'm more than willing to leap for joy if that's true, but it doesn't seem to be correlated with the recount.

5
datboiforever 5 points ago +5 / -0

It could very well be extrapolation. If we assume the votes are reasonably shuffled, this is a reasonable thing to do.

2
pithys 2 points ago +3 / -1

indeed 150k is a lot. But think about it... how many ppl never practice their signatures? I for sure don't

3
itsnotaboutme 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just heard on the radio this morning they have only found a "few" votes during the recount. This was conservative radio. Always saying no signs of fraud. I am in Green Bay WI

5
pithys 5 points ago +5 / -0

fraud is one thing, but disqualified votes is another

2
USAF4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh wow so they’re actually allowed to do their job of challenging the ballots! Color me surprised

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
6
bear__aware 6 points ago +6 / -0

Statistical analysis indicates that nearly 100,000 persons who exploited this exemption to cast absentee ballots were not actually indefinitely confined on Election Day, meaning they should not have been eligible to vote.

Have they shared their methodology anywhere? I'm not doubting because I think Braynard et al are very thorough but this just doesn't spell anything out. I think they are saying "statistical analysis" to just mean that they derived an estimate from a small sample of raw evidence. In some of these cases the raw evidence is clear what it would be ; e.g. they called a registered Republican who according to the rolls voted as Indefinitely Confined, but on the phone absolutely denies that they did such a thing. Then extrapolate the frequency of such cases to the whole state or whole districts. But-- what about this "not actually indefinitely confined" case? Is the raw evidence consisting of supposedly Indefinitely Confined voters on the rolls, whose public social media profiles were tracked down and seen to demonstrate that the person was clearly not confined? I know there have been a few such cases reported. But it is labor intensive to find these. So how many base raw/proven examples do they have, and to how large a population did they statistically extrapolate to? Braynard said he was coming out with a whitepaper, hopefully he spells it out.

3
MakeAmericaLegendary 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly what I was looking for; thank you!

Any idea whether there's litigation coming from this or whether they'll wait until after the recount?

1
memtndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

The comment above from the got-freedom.org site is a pretty good summary.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
17
Hagrid 17 points ago +17 / -0

Relevant interview yesterday, Phil Kline on Bannon discussing the evidence:

https://youtu.be/FmbTwFhS6Rk?t=4798

1
TendiesRee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey thanks for that it's very appreciated.

14
Salacious_B_Trump [S] 14 points ago +14 / -0

Here is more specific info on the fraudulent ballots from the Amistad Project themselves https://got-freedom.org/2020/11/24/amistad-project-files-litigation-calling-more-than-150000-wisconsin-ballots-into-question/

4
HSTiberius 4 points ago +5 / -1

Should have submitted this as the link directly, way better than the JTN summary

5
Salacious_B_Trump [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah I know it is a better one. I found it after I submitted the first one already. Oh well.

13
yanksali 13 points ago +13 / -0

Court will rule every fraudulent vote must be counted otherwise it disenfranchises those who are dead, don’t live in the state or who are not citizens.

13
DavidB3333 13 points ago +13 / -0

Father in Heaven please bless all the people who have brought this petition that these 150,000 fraudulent votes are taken away from Joe Biden in the name of Jesus Christ Amen. Thank you Father.

12
Rainman 12 points ago +12 / -0

AWESOME!

I hoping these cheating bastards have more than they can handle in trying to defeat these lawsuits and they should just keep coming until the system is fixed.

7
Sendnudes 7 points ago +9 / -2

I fucking hate it when "news" sites throw out big issues like this with zero detail.

There is nothi g here more than a headline.

Where/how did they find the ballots!?

I have no doubt the fraud is there but I would like to have some bit of detail to decide if this worth getting excited over or not.

13
7
Sendnudes 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thank you for this.

THIS is the link that should have been stickied for us to get amped up about!

4
Salacious_B_Trump [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sorry. I found this link after I already created the first post.

6
TheTuckerDiaries 6 points ago +6 / -0

Day of the Rope is coming for riggers.

☁️☁️☁️πŸŒ₯☁️☁️☁️

🚁 <β€”β€” MAGA πŸ—³ 🀸 <β€”β€” Riggers and RINOs

πŸ—»πŸ—»πŸ—»πŸ”πŸŒ‹πŸ”πŸ—»

6
KELPERZ 6 points ago +7 / -1

Is anyone shocked at this point? All those that commit voter fraud are traitors to the republic and should be treated as such.

6
BarbaraStreisand 6 points ago +6 / -0

They cheated during the recount of a rigged referendum in Wisconsin that "passed" by 5 votes. Joe Biden personally endorsed this referendum in April of 2020! Then they used the corrupt Wisconsin courts to rubber stamp the fraudulent recount results.

This was a test for the much more serious rigging they were planning for the presidential election in Wisconsin later in the year. The same exact series of events is likely to unfold in Wisconsin during the recount and Trumps court cases.

Is it just a coincidence that the President of Microsoft, who is working on "election security" software called ElectionGuard, grew up in the exact same town where this rigged referendum took place? Is it just a coincidence that they tested the ElectionGuard software in Wisconsin only two months before they rigged the referendum to pass by 5 votes?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
thegermanone 5 points ago +5 / -0

That is what we need

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
smartass 5 points ago +6 / -1

Biden's alleged lead was only 20,600. Oops!

5
Bedminster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wisconsin judge will absolutely toss this out and the SCOTUS will over turn it.

3
RPD2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Over turning a good thing?

2
Greg-2012 2 points ago +2 / -0

yes

4
HSTiberius 4 points ago +4 / -0

So when, eventually, we get proven right about all this and Joepedo isn't crowned king of the world in January, how do we think the normies are going to handle it coming completely out of left field for them?

Think about it, unless you're engaged with this site or a relative handful of others, you have no idea this fight is even happening. What a shocker.

4
SupremeDearLeader2 4 points ago +4 / -0

My reddit acc is chock full of messages from gloating commiecucks . I want them to eat their words.

1
Greg-2012 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are going to freak out, AntiFa will hit the streets and burn down Dem controlled shitholes.

4
Supersaiyanbroly737 4 points ago +4 / -0

LOL corruption judge will just toss it out.

Seriously, Dims are probably offering a lot of money to the judge right now. LMAO

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
MakeLiberalsCryAgain 3 points ago +4 / -1

I bet these riggas got paid a lot of money to perpetrate this fraud. Now they rigga rich!

1
BarbaraStreisand 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was the election in Wisconsin rigged through the education bureaucracy using money from a rigged referendum that JOE BIDEN shilled for earlier in the year? The referendum, which passed by 5 votes, gave one billion dollars to the Racine school district, but the money is controlled by a private organization run by BILL CLINTONS WISCONSIN CAMPAIGN MANAGER.

Was some of that money earmarked for corrupted poll workers / teachers? The NEA and teachers union endorsed Biden. Also Democrat Gov Tony Evers previously served as the Wisconsin Superintendent of Public Instruction. Did they rig it in Wisconsin through the education bureaucracy?

Wisconsin schools are rife with corruption and pedophilia scandals. By February of 2020 there had already been three WI educators charged with federal sex crimes in 2020 alone, including the superintendent of Altoona. The Wisconsin Public Education Network uses a pedophile logo. Some school districts in Wisconsin even allow incarcerated criminals to teach at school WHILE THEY ARE IN JAIL using work release programs similar to the one Jeffrey Epstein got. It would be extremely easy to use blackmail to control what happens to money allocated to school districts in WI

Wisconsin was the first state to swing in Bidens favor after the counting freeze and that is not a coincidence. Pelosi had just stated a few weeks prior that the entire election was "riding on Wisconsin" while earlier in the year Joe Biden shilled for a blatantly rigged referendum in Wisconsin? And the person in control of the money allocated by that referendum is Bill Clintons Wisconsin Campaign manager??

...Then Wisconsin is the first state in a series of "miraculous" comebacks for Biden??? Fishy.

Even more fishy is the fact that the President of Microsoft, who is working on "election security" software called ElectionGuard, grew up in the exact same town where this rigged referendum took place. Is it just a coincidence that they tested the ElectionGuard software in Wisconsin only two months before they rigged the referendum to pass by 5 votes?

The same technology that Bill Gates wants to use to track everyone's vaccination history (see ID2020) can now be used to "secure" our elections by tracking everyone's vote with an "anonymous" digital ID tied to their person. This election crisis was perpetrated to implement an agenda that is starting to look an awful lot like the Mark of the Beast.

3
Throwingway22 3 points ago +4 / -1

It's absurd that this will kicked on standing. It's amazing that judge created rules like standing only apply to Republican challenges.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
kag-2020- 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mods are going for the high score on whack-a-shill. Must be over the target!

3
TrumpsBestFriend 3 points ago +3 / -0

on Steve Bannon's show, they discussed the fact 8 full tables full of ballots are being disputed just in Milwaukee

3
letrain 3 points ago +3 / -0

Need something to drop, swing, or change so everyone talks about it over thanksgiving.

2
HistoryInvestigator 2 points ago +3 / -1

there's no details. what was fraudulent about these votes and how did they find them?

2
ImFinallyNotAnAlt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not one state not one county not one city not one precinct not one small town not ONE PLACE has voter fraud in favor of Trump. Not a single one. They all favor Joe Biden. And not ONE person is locked away in a jail cell.

2
p8riot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is there another source on this? They don't link the petition in the article.

2
2
p8riot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks I'll use it, this does have more information but still no link to the petition.

2
mrs.rose 2 points ago +2 / -0

most likely voters who did not submit absentee ballot application right? I know that is WI law

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
TribeGuy97 2 points ago +2 / -0

A statistical look at likely voter turnout says at least 450K fraudulent ballots were counted in Wisconsin.

2
SkeletorsTeeth 2 points ago +2 / -0

1 nice sized win in 3 or 4 states...all we need

2
MakeAmericaGreat9 2 points ago +2 / -0

this is why they are rushing...they know we have them dead to rights

2
minotaurbeach 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Patriot_Science 2 points ago +2 / -0

🧠 STABLE GENIUS 🧠

1
winsome 1 point ago +1 / -0

willful violation

1
ThreeGreen21 1 point ago +1 / -0

woot woot

1
Phil_DeGraves 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the MSM coverage of this will be.... zero:

https://thedonald.win/p/11QS2vdJih/no-evidence-nope--none-at-all-ho/c/

1
LaurenD 1 point ago +1 / -0

πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™ I hope a judge takes this seriously.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0