4119
Comments (575)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
kag-2020- 3 points ago +4 / -1

Legally they'd need because they can become accomplices in things like election fraud. Funny how ambiguous laws are, isn't it!

2
GAShredder 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually no. But that would be nice, then I would’ve known what the fbi, cia, & DHS were shredding at the shredding business I work for.

2
kag-2020- 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol!

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
kag-2020- 2 points ago +2 / -0

The bin was overflowing with ballots! It's all they were shredding! You would defend them if there were literal arms sticking out, LMFAO!!!

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
kag-2020- 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's why it's ILLEGAL to destroy them for 22 months! These criminals were so anxious to steal the election they destroyed them anyways! They are entitled to millennias in Federal prison!

1
Violet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Damn, you’re all over these threads stinking things up with your particular brand of thinking man’s concern trolling.

Because the law says that paper ballots must be retained for 22 months after elections. End of story.

Matter of fact, you’d think a shredding company worth its salt might have some pause and look into things when the Board of Elections calls them in a tizzy, asking them to shred tons of ballot-looking papers just days after a highly publicized, controversial recount.

But I know you already know this, “MAGA” “attorney.”

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
LongKnifeKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Quite the doomer post history you’ve got going guy.