Be sure to read the dissenting opinion, which points out things that should be obvious. Specifically, Justice Viviano identifies what the concurring Justices overlook, that not all audits are equal. Some audits are designed to improve the process for future elections, others are designed to ensure the accuracy of current elections. The latter type is obviously what the plaintiffs are advocating for and would be appropriate here. The concurring opinion assumes all types are of the former type.
Perhaps the Plaintiffs can amend their complaint to specifically identify and request the audit Justice Viviano is talking about.
Either way, even though it lends some. credibility to the claims of fraud, I find the concurring opinion extremely disingenuous.
Be sure to read the dissenting opinion, which points out things that should be obvious. Specifically, Justice Viviano identifies what the concurring Justices overlook, that not all audits are equal. Some audits are designed to improve the process for future elections, others are designed to ensure the accuracy of current elections. The latter type is obviously what the plaintiffs are advocating for and would be appropriate here. The concurring opinion assumes all types are of the former type.
Perhaps the Plaintiffs can amend their complaint to specifically identify and request the audit Justice Viviano is talking about.
Either way, even though it lends some. credibility to the claims of fraud, I find the concurring opinion extremely disingenuous.