U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61 (1878)
It is essential to a bill in chancery on behalf of the United States to set aside a patent for lands or the final confirmation of a Mexican grant that it shall appear in some way, without regard to the special form, that the Attorney General has brought it himself or given such authority for bringing it as will make him officially responsible therefor through all stages of its presentation.
The frauds for which a bill to set aside a judgment or a decree between the same parties, rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, will be sustained are those which are extrinsic or collateral to the matter tried, and not a fraud which was in issue in the former suit.
The cases where such relief has been granted are those in which, by fraud or deception practiced on the unsuccessful party, he has been prevented from exhibiting fully his case, by reason of which there has never been a real contest before the court of the subject matter of the suit.
The circuit court of the United States has now no original jurisdiction to reform surveys made by the land department of confirmed Mexican grants in California.
1878 Throckmorton SCOTUS case set precedent for that to happen. Trump wins by default.
KEK! Public educashun is grate, I don’t no whut you talkin about.
fraud vitiates everything
Yes.
Take a peek at 11.
If fraud is involved, the contract is essentially broken.
So that would then require a new vote rather than defaulting to GEOTUS, right? Since his batch of cookies would be tossed as well.
I might just nibble a part of every cookie...
Yes you can. Our legal system is based on precedent. There is no expiration dates for precedent... unless a newer case comes and reverses it somehow.
Very true.... But why don't we see hangings for treason anymore. IMO once a law has sat to long without use it becomes questionable.
I don't believe it's sat around long though. It might be the prime case used in all fraud cases. Not completely sure, but it could be.
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61 (1878)
It is essential to a bill in chancery on behalf of the United States to set aside a patent for lands or the final confirmation of a Mexican grant that it shall appear in some way, without regard to the special form, that the Attorney General has brought it himself or given such authority for bringing it as will make him officially responsible therefor through all stages of its presentation.
The frauds for which a bill to set aside a judgment or a decree between the same parties, rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, will be sustained are those which are extrinsic or collateral to the matter tried, and not a fraud which was in issue in the former suit.
The cases where such relief has been granted are those in which, by fraud or deception practiced on the unsuccessful party, he has been prevented from exhibiting fully his case, by reason of which there has never been a real contest before the court of the subject matter of the suit.
The circuit court of the United States has now no original jurisdiction to reform surveys made by the land department of confirmed Mexican grants in California.
So how exactly does this work for the presidency?
Post the other 7 points up to 11 now.