Dude we need you commenting on nearly every post here. Thank you.
Court is encouraging (ordering) other court(s) to consider the vote integrity issues asap, including evidence, though this court, for this decision, isn’t going to because it’s not on their plate.
Can you expand a bit on this? The next court is SCOTUS (if its appealed)?
Someone wanted to stop the certification - that's the only thing this was about. They wasn't asking for an audit - just asking to stop the certification. Judges basically said "the count got certified so we won't un-certify it, but come back to court and argue your case for an audit".
Next court would not be SCOTUS; if I'm not mistaken it would be the same level of court in Michigan (or lower), but on the meat of the issue - the constitutional arguments, rather than this, which was only on the request to stop certification
Dude we need you commenting on nearly every post here. Thank you.
Can you expand a bit on this? The next court is SCOTUS (if its appealed)?
I agree, please comment on everything from now on lol
/SUBSCRIBE TO ZIPODK TRANSLATIONS
I don’t understand that either. We need a legalese-to English-to public school translation.
Added one!
Someone wanted to stop the certification - that's the only thing this was about. They wasn't asking for an audit - just asking to stop the certification. Judges basically said "the count got certified so we won't un-certify it, but come back to court and argue your case for an audit".
Damn, do you think we will make it on time?
Seems like plenty of time to be heard
Yeah ultimately I need drawings with stick figures and little buildings.
Next court would not be SCOTUS; if I'm not mistaken it would be the same level of court in Michigan (or lower), but on the meat of the issue - the constitutional arguments, rather than this, which was only on the request to stop certification