Agree there is encouraging language here.
However please note there are 7 members of the MI Supreme Court.
The order of 4 of them, a majority, was simply to deny the injunction.
This opinion is a concurring opinion of 1 of the 7 justices, and a second joined. A third judge disagreed with denying the injunction in the dissenting opinion.
So only 3 of the 7 judges said anything encouraging.
Doesn’t mean we can’t win after the audit but we should all know what we are reading.
Agree there is encouraging language here. However please note there are 7 members of the MI Supreme Court. The order of 4 of them, a majority, was simply to deny the injunction. This opinion is a concurring opinion of 1 of the 7 justices, and a second joined. A third judge disagreed with denying the injunction in the dissenting opinion. So only 3 of the 7 judges said anything encouraging. Doesn’t mean we can’t win after the audit but we should all know what we are reading.