The screenshot is from the dismissal I believe, hence it starts “nothing said is to diminish...”.
The question for any court right now is not whether or not there were voter irregularities (There clearly were), it’s whether it was substantial enough to sway the vote, which is loftier burden of proof, thus, the lawyers need to work double time to get this shit watertight.
The screenshot is from the dismissal I believe, hence it starts “nothing said is to diminish...”.
The question for any court right now is not whether or not there were voter irregularities (There clearly were), it’s whether it was substantial enough to sway the vote, which is loftier burden of proof, thus, the lawyers need to work double time to get this shit watertight.
That's the kinda clown world we live in. There's proof of irregularities but its ok since we're not sure if they were enough to sway the elections.