I read that a couple days ago. It is interesting but does not deal with election law. I read the entire filing. They do say "fraud vititates everything," in the opinion, but it is not a decisive use of the phrase, but rather used as a well known axiom to enhance the opinion's validity. Still has bearing, though. Worth paying some attention.
That is how the left is framing the narrative. Why though? All he has to prove is that their was a concerted effort to fraudulantly change the outcome of the election, beyond "random" acts of individual malfeasance.
I read that a couple days ago. It is interesting but does not deal with election law. I read the entire filing. They do say "fraud vititates everything," in the opinion, but it is not a decisive use of the phrase, but rather used as a well known axiom to enhance the opinion's validity. Still has bearing, though. Worth paying some attention.
Lol tempted to edit my post. We do need that hopium.
The Hopium Wars
I just read about the opium wars. The CCP faggots used it to addict the only people that might oppose their power.
Dang those facts again...
That is how the left is framing the narrative. Why though? All he has to prove is that their was a concerted effort to fraudulantly change the outcome of the election, beyond "random" acts of individual malfeasance.
You're correct, but I think it can be applied to elections!
If the axiom is followed it is a good thing for us.
Also puts the Dems on the defense. Attack from every possible angle.
It won’t though. Reason being, it’s not every individual voters fault that fraud took place.
Res Ipsa Loquitur.
The thing speaks for itself.
Good point