26
posted ago by Dogwhistle1 +27 / -1

Think about this, the Space Force was created under POTUS for a few reasons. 1. All heads in charge and rank and file would be Trump appointments. 2. Funds could be appropriated at a necessary level to do whatever needed to be done. 3. They could work with the Air Force who is the only branch they is not infested with deep state opposition. We have (fact) nearly 1,400 military aircraft over us now and loads during the election. These planes certainly are capable, as evident in previous war missions, to monitor targets and use thermo images to track all movements. Lead was removed from paint not for our safety but to allow for heat imaging (spying) on citizens and targets. I strongly believe, all their ballot dropping and voter machine recycling was caught on video this way. POTUS openly told everyone, watch for the ballot drops in the night. It is a possibility. Thoughts??????

Comments (25)
sorted by:
5
NuclearRocks1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lead paint....? The rest plausible 😊

4
NCW2D4TW 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes. The theory holds weight without mentioning lead paint.

7
tonysoprano 7 points ago +7 / -0

This post is a good reminder of why lead was removed from paint, but it has nothing to do with heat imaging.

2
Proud_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

Succinct use of the perils of lead paint.

3
Dogwhistle1 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lead paint will block it, this is not my theory. Lead can not penetrated by any of ray spectrum i.e x-ray drapes at the hospital.

2
Dogwhistle1 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, why do think lead is draped over you for x rays?

3
tonysoprano 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lead was removed from paint not for our safety but to allow for heat imaging (spying) on citizens and targets.

Lead is draped over you during x-rays to block radiation, not a thermal signature. You don't need lead based paint to block thermal imaging. Any normal structure will do that.

2
Dogwhistle1 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not true, to what degree, I know x ray for lead. Lead does disrupt thermal, lead in walls + metal roofs would be a difficult target. Once again just a theory. I’ve used thermal scopes and it will pick up through walls.

2
tonysoprano 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's some thermal imaging footage of thousands of people marching down a street. All of the people are readily visible. Why can't I see into any of the surrounding structures? Are all the structures painted with lead paint?

https://youtu.be/sxGyWsDV4-I

More thermal imaging looking for a robbery suspect. How many structures can you see into?

https://youtu.be/oEM-BrRNMqc

1
Dogwhistle1 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Theory, that’s all. I can tell you this, I have a best friend who works with a certain company MIC, top level, said what they have is unbelievable and we don’t get to know about it.

2
giggitybooped 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, but a paint-thin layer?

1
Dogwhistle1 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Im saying it’s not there now and yes lead disrupts. That’s it, just a theory, I like to think outside the box. I don’t care about what other people think, it’s fun to be curious.

3
Songofsixpence 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like it! Never heard about the lead paint theory. Anyone got more info on that?

2
Dogwhistle1 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mylar, aluminum, lead all disrupt thermal, lead blocks x ray and in combination with metal roofs and lead paints in walls thermal is very difficult from everything I’ve read. It’s just a theory.

2
NCPatriqt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Use it on Navy Ships still.

3
NCPatriqt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lead paint 100% helps mask it from thermal imagining. Read up on why US Navy ships us lead paint still...

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Dogwhistle1 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty much in a nutshell, I believe Trump and the Patriots were fully prepared.

2
Michonne21 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m with him. Trump is a prophet.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
jackwerntz 2 points ago +2 / -0

The push to remove lead in paints used residential buildings in this country goes back at least to the 1950s, with outright bans happening through the late 70s. I'm also not really sure if the amount of lead in paints would have behaved the way you think. An inch thick lead plate behaves a lot differently then a small amount of lead in a thin coating of paint.

1
Dogwhistle1 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

53’ Kennedy, theory that’s all

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Voted4Johnson 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yeah this sounds like total bullshit.

1
Dogwhistle1 [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Total? Cool