Very significant number of people that received absentee ballots in states where you must request them said they never requested them (from call surveys of thousands of voters in each state that received absentee ballots but didn't return them)
Significant number of people moved states and still voted (some voted in both states)
Very significant number of people said they were permanently confined, he sampled using social media and found 40% of them lied (probably much more)
He DID NOT confirm any significant number of deceased voters due to difficulty getting good matches from vote records to death records (DOB not always available)
Hold up a second, I'm OK with accessing damages against the democrat party and demanding reparations for their past actions. Having survived 8 years of Clinton and 8 years of Obama, I am entitled to some reparations!
Especially those folks who have lost businesses because of Covid lockdowns. When it comes out that the Dems are responsible for commissioning it small business owners all over the country should sue.
If it came out and was generally accepted that democrats caused all the covid pain for purely political reasons I think getting sued should be the least of their worries.
I'm self employed. I've lost $30,000 because of the lockdowns (that's after getting a forgivable loan). My wife and I are very responsible and had 6 months in emergency expenses saved up. I wasn't that mad after the first lockdowns but I'm pretty upset now. I can't imagine what people who didn't have savings are going through.
We had some saved but a series of events from medical to a death in the family to our home getting ransacked and everything stolen down to and including the copper pipes while we were away over Christmas last year, no less, left us with saying “at least we still have the business.” Ha. Still have the business but it is tough. And it is infuriating to hear the govt call for people to only go out to buy food and medicine and doing their best to kill the holidays when many businesses might recover a bit. Then we look at GEOTUS and his example of relentless hard work, seemingly enjoying it the whole time, and always being positive in thought. Hopeful for the future and driven to work to make it good. And because of that leadership by example it’s possible to keep our minds in a healthy place and continue to work to make it through this. He has to prevail. We have to prevail.
This is what the globalists and deep state wants, they want to destroy all the progress that has been made since Obama and blame it all on a virus. That way the people might not resist as hard when loosing their businesses. It’s a cynical take I know, but most likely true.
Courts are fine until they are not. We’ve all seen corrupt judges throughout the system. If they dont play along they should get arrested too.
You don’t get to defraud a Trump voter, steal an election, and then claim the victory. This is treason. Acts of war against our nation. Courts better come correct or they are enemy combatants. You never concede to treason.
judges are political when they shouldn't be. That's just how they get appointed.
What we need is a score card, judges should have penalties if their decisions get overruled in appeals. Too many of those and obviously they shouldn't remain a judge.
My GOP sample ballot didn’t list the local judges. When I asked about judge recommendations, 2 local GOP reps told me “we didn’t have time to vet them”. Didn’t inspire a whole bunch of confidence. A crap-load of judges are corrupted as we’re finding out.
This is an excellent idea and I have has similar thoughts.
I am in the UK so for obvious reasons I feel we need a civilian board that has investigation and arrest powers solely over Police and the Judiciary. Such a board should be comprised of people whose core values are freedom and individual rights. Their powers should be huge and any cop or judge should have to accept that they could be under 24/7 surveillance with monitoring of all their movements, actions and communications at any time, for any reason.
Funnily enough, Judge Dredd has this right; the judges live in fear of the 'Special Judicial Squad' who can kick down their doors at any time and treat them as guilty until proven innocent.
This might sound distasteful to some but if you want to wield power over your fellow citizens, then be prepared to be held to a higher standard. Automatic Malfeasance/Misconduct in public office charges for any breach, Life sentence if found guilty.
The problem is obviously how do you ensure the good intentions of such people? Who watches the watchers, and who watches them?
I like your idea of a 'score card'. A policeman with too low a score will find that go against them in any court case and any cases seriously impacting someone's freedom or rights would require a judge of a certain score or above.
I get that we're both angry and being a bit hyperbolic...
But you are calling for a return to an age of savagery.
Western civilization has lifted us out of both poverty and brutal violence to an astounding degree. It has done this through very important principles.
We are here to maga. That means we must return this country to the principles that made her the greatest nation on earth. Neither party has stood for that kind of integrity for far too long.
Those principles absolutely allow us, even require us, to hold these treasonous traitors accountable. They also demand that we provide them a fair trial before we execute them, and that we leave their innocent families out of it. That part dates back to the earliest days of civilization. We are not animals.
There are reasons for these principles, and very good ones. We cannot rebuild the nation we want to live in if we abandon that which made her great.
We must not allow our (righteous) anger to set us on a path that will inevitably result in the destruction of that we hold most dear.
I believe we will win this battle, but, more and more, statements like that make me fear that we will not have the mental and spiritual integrity and restraint necessary to end the war as quickly as possible and bring about the peace we actually want.
Be better than the unprincipled commies we stand against. And remember what it really means to #MAGA!
But you are calling for a return to an age of savagery.
We're IN an age of savagery. Thugs roam the streets, burning looting and murdering, and when the press covers it, which is exceedingly rare, it's with an level of tacit approval bordering on overt glee. "Mostly peaceful protests" they declare, even as the reporter covering (up) the riots is spontaneously attacked by a group of piece of shit criminals hooting and whooping on by.
The ONLY reason we're not shooting it out on the streets whenever these fuckers pop up, is because one entire side insists that they're not getting involved, that the only way to win a firefight is to not shoot back no matter what, and take your death with grace knowing that you died with a firm grasp of "the high ground", whatever that's worth when your wife and kids are next once you're gone.
Really, it's an age of cuckoldry. "Please continue raping my wife, because I'm a very tolerant ally of your hostile community that explicitly hates me and would never give in to the urge to produce bad optics and make my side look worse by responding to your wanton violence committed entirely without justifiable provocation against my family. #ICantBreathe!"
The ONLY reason we're not shooting it out on the streets whenever these fuckers pop up, is because one entire side insists that they're not getting involved, that the only way to win a firefight is to not shoot back no matter what, and take your death with grace knowing that you died with a firm grasp of "the high ground", whatever that's worth when your wife and kids are next once you're gone.
Bullshit. And you know it.
Or, if you really don't get it, you belong in a home for adults of limited mental faculties, requiring supervision 24/7/365... Because it's not safe to have you roaming around any more than it's safe to let antifa roam our streets.
I agree that wearing black pajamas has turned out to be a free pass to burn, loot, and assault far too often, even if they're arrested. However, the reason we're not shooting it out on the streets is that we have a justice system that has worked reasonably well for almost 250 years. (Really, you could argue our justice system is an evolution of about 2500 years, across different state organizations.) And we know that shooting it out on the streets will undermine that justice system... And we all have a vague notion of what life would be like if we collapsed that justice system.
Hint: it will make silly white liberals larping as badasses look like what they really are: ridiculous.
We absolutely need to hold those rioters accountable; to do otherwise also undermines our justice system (just not quite as much as shooting it out in the streets). We also must to hold the DAs and mayors accountable for their part in weakening our justice system.
But you know, deep down, that, if we abandon the principles that allow our society to function, even, or perhaps especially, if others have done so first, we will let the twin sparks of liberty and justice sputter out, and rekindling them may or may not be within our power.
We must use our righteous anger to propel us into the action needed to root out this corruption, but we must not allow that anger to rule us, or we will be equally responsible for failing to act as faithful stewards of the gift of western civilization that our forbears fought and died to pass into our hands.
They also demand that we provide them a fair trial before we execute them, and that we leave their innocent families out of it.
So what you are writing is that their families should have their citizenship revoked, be deported to some hellhole somewhere (with whatever they didn't get through theft and the like refunded), and be barred from ever returning to the USA on penalty of death. Since else they will bank on their families being able to continue somewhat as before and do their extreme evils and endangerment and sacrifice of the human species covertly until the time is opportune.
That part dates back to the earliest days of civilization.
Are you a concern trolling communist shill, LARPing as a libertarian?
We managed to come through the American Revolution and the Civil War without devolving to the kind of savagery you suggest. And both involved treasonous traitors in our midst.
Are we so much weaker than our forbears, that we must resort to destroying what they gave us as we pretend to save it?
If we act with the guidance of the principles that created this nation, we can begin to rebuild trust among our countrymen. That trust amongst the majority of our citizens is what will save us, not if, but when this kind of treason is attempted again.
I know many Biden voters. Most of them still haven't accepted the truth. When they finally do, I expect their anger, at having been made fools of for so long, will match or exceed my own. I can see the doubt beginning to form in their minds. Their wrath will not be inconsequential.
As long as we act in a way that allows them to see us as estranged countrymen, rather than as savage beasts bloodletting the land, they will join us in calling for the heads of the guilty. And, for the rest of their lives, they will be among the most vigilant against fraud, either in the media or in our elections. But, if we act as the liars in media have promised them we will act, disregarding the principles we all know must guide our nation in liberty, there will be no trust, and there will be no healing this country.
Yes, we must be willing to do what must be done to secure our future, but our future will not be a place we want to live if we allow ourselves to be ruled by our anger.
I hear you and agree with you for the most part however I don't think you can really make fair comparisons to the past. In the past, even if there was an enemy, they were people with morals, values, some level of honor and sense of right/wrong. They were often God fearing. The enemy of today lacks values and morals and believes in nothing but their own Godhood. They don't even have a problem ass raping kids for fun. They aren't looking to preserve their right to live the way they see fit, they are looking for a free for all chaotic destruction of everything and anything. So our forbears had themselves some tough enemies but they were no the sub-human filth we are dealing with today. They are also people who cannot be fixed or healed and they will never stop until dead.
So you are indeed a communist shill that does not believe his own writings at all whatsoever, and you are well aware of that.
What I propose is in some important regards much, much milder than those of the wars of the past, such as reg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherman's_March_to_the_Sea , where destroyed infrastructure and civilian property was not refunded. And the situations back then were extremely different from now in many absolutely critical aspects, and you are fully aware of that.
And how do you claim that deportation of the families of executed traitors are that greatly different from the exile, deportation and emigration of loyalists in the American Revolutionary War?: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)#Emigration_from_the_United_States . Many of whom most likely did not have members among them committing treasonous acts? Especially since I propose refunds?
And they would be incredibly much milder than that of actions the USA did in wars in the 20th century.
[...] bloodletting the land, [...]
How is deportation "bloodletting the land"??? Did you copy-paste this from something you wrote previously?
These actions are not at all based on anger, but seem like the most basic of requirements to even have a chance of survival in the short term (not to mention the long term) for the USA and its people.
Are we so much weaker than our forbears, that we must resort to destroying what they gave us as we pretend to save it?
The forebears of the USA would have risen up in violent revolution decades ago and wet the tree of liberty like never before if they had access to the information and knowledge that is only now becoming clearer and clearer day by day. And they would have most likely changed, improved and built upon the systems based on the experiences, insights and knowledge that is now available.
I know many Biden voters. Most of them still haven't accepted the truth. When they finally do, I expect their anger, at having been made fools of for so long, will match or exceed my own. I can see the doubt beginning to form in their minds. Their wrath will not be inconsequential.
As long as we act in a way that allows them to see us as estranged countrymen, rather than as savage beasts bloodletting the land, they will join us in calling for the heads of the guilty. And, for the rest of their lives, they will be among the most vigilant against fraud, either in the media or in our elections. But, if we act as the liars in media have promised them we will act, disregarding the principles we all know must guide our nation in liberty, there will be no trust, and there will be no healing this country.
And you don't believe what you write here yourself at all whatsoever. Antifa merely being "estranged" while seeking enslavement, genocide and extermination of the USA and its people? And you know fully well that it is not regular "Biden voters" this would be about.
I know many Biden voters.
That is not surprising coming from a communist shill.
True. And I know Trump won and will win. But let's remember this:
The states don't have to actually FLIP, all they need to do is not get certified by the state to go to Biden. All we really have to do is keep him from getting to 270 electors and Trump wins.
Flipping or voiding AZ, GA, & WI removes the minimum # (37 out of 79) required to prevent Biden from getting to 270.
I haven't heard how PA shakes out. They didn't follow procedure to legally change mail-in ballot law and didn't segregate ballots like they were supposed to. So then, once that judges agree that is the situation, then what do they do about it?
There's nothing the judge could do besides overturn the election that would be fair to the Trump campaign, assuming they demonstrate that more illegal votes were cast than the election margin.
Which I believe they can do. Especially if the judges rule that opening and counting mail in and absentee votes without observers present so blatantly violates basic principles of election integrity that the votes so counted must be invalidated. Which seems like a no brainier to me, but courts really hate invalidating votes.
Precisely. Any amount of fraud cancels out legitimate votes. If so much as one vote is cancelled out by a fraudulent vote, equal protection has been violated.
Fraud vitiates everything. Yep, entire state should be invalidated.
But, after he's won, they're needs to be a full audit on every single ballot in this country. I demand to know how many votes he truly got! He deserves that number
The courts so far are requiring the Trump lawyers to prove the number if affected votes will change the election or they can't continue. That's stupid reasoning, but it's their excuse for not allowing the suits to proceed.
That’s absolutely stupid on the part of the courts considering if there was massive fraud, it took the Democrats years to organize it so in depth, and the Trump Team lawyers only had/have a few weeks to investigate and connect the dots. I still hope Trump pulls this off against those bastards.
I don’t think the courts are going to give as much credence to statistics as we are hoping. No matter how statistically improbable something is, there’s still a chance of it happening.
The simple counter-argument is that, however unlikely the result was (like 99% of independent mail ins going to Sundown Joe, for example), it happened.
Now add some additional information to the statistics, like ballots returned before they were officially mailed and observers being arbitrarily kicked out of counting locations, and maybe you hit that 51% preponderance of evidence for a civil case. But the statistics alone mean nothing, at least in court.
Stats corroborate testimony and expand the subjective argument to a larger scale. That opens the door at least to formal forensic auditing if not more extreme remedy.
Our entire justice system is based on the notion of uncertainty, e.g. reasonable doubt or preponderance of evidence. Both are fundamentally subjective standards that rest on the minds of judge or jury depending on the case. Stats help persuade, especially the kinds of extreme outliers observed over and over. The converse also holds.....evidence of fraud in the presence of statistically expected voting distributions would be persuasive against a rigged election.
It's all a persuasion game, which is why the formal deductive arguments (e.g. constitutional violations, illegal procedures etc) are lower hanging fruit.
Did you watch the video? He actually looked though people's social media to see if they were "indefinitely confined". They weren't. This has less to do with "statistics" and more to do with actually leg work.
he lays out up front that his analysis supports the legal cases, so this is an analytical part of the case, but of course not alone, just as well say that the persuasive opinions would not stand alone, a lot of pieces need to worked together
He actually concludes that, even with all the resources in the world, he would not be able to conclusively determine who won the election. Timestamp 34:30
This is exactly what I took from his conclusion as well.
If he had a million dollars and a team of FBI agents to go through all the data he still couldn't conclude who won.. well then you must invalidate these states because the election was a fraud itself.
The problem is the courts will simply never allow this. It’s a path in that it’s theoretically possible... but... there is no way they will disenfranchise these states. This would not work like we want. It would ultimately break our entire system and we would no longer be a democracy (are we now even?). The courts simply ignores this evidence anyway. There’s no way these states are going to disenfranchise that many voters. It will have dire, permanent consequences in those states. I think at this point they have stolen it and the only way to stop the steal was to prevent certification in these states. I am not sure how to fix it at this point, Trump needs us and our support but I can’t see him having a successful term if this is how he “wins”. I think the most plausible path forward is to totally fix the voting over the next two years so this can never happen again. Democrats can’t win a fair election. I want Four (eight?) more years of Trump too, it has been glorious, but the Democrats are forcing us to essentially break the country to win at this point.
This is a good and thoughtful point, but what will be the motivation for electoral reform if this fraud is allowed to stand? If you are operating under the premise that fraud did in fact happen, you have to also project the logical consequences of permitting the fraud to happen.
If the fraud stands, Biden has zero incentive to sign off on electoral reform, and the fraudulent states, who are ultimately responsible for their elections, have zero incentive to reform their systems. The only way to get electoral reform is 1) win now and 2) punish the fraudulent states by robbing them of their apparent victory, either through Trump electors or invalidating the election results.
Make sure to compare apples to apples. Trump having a "less than successful term" should be compared to the Democrats receiving carte blanche to conduct elections on their terms, effectively disenfranchising millions of voters within states and across the country, destroying faith in the electoral process, and potentially opening the floodgates to a torrent of leftist attacks on 1A and 2A, citizenship, the court system, and so forth. And THAT could easily lead to civil war.
It's a Czechoslovakia moment: At a certain point you must take a stand, despite the difficulties, in order to prevent worse from happening. The fraud of 2020 has brought the old order to an end, and now we must fight to determine what the new order will look like.
This is a false argument. The whole "disenfranchise" word is a political psyop. First of all lets be sure of what we're talking about
Definition of disenfranchise
transitive verb
: to deprive of a franchise, of a legal right, or of some privilege or immunity
especially : to deprive of the right to vote
The key here is legal. Every illegal, fraudulent, double vote disenfranchises the entire voter base. Every such vote makes every other vote diluted. Therefore the entire "we will disenfranchise the voter" point is moot. By having any aforementioned votes in the election you have already disenfranchised every single person that voted. So lets stop with the parroting political psyop nonsense.
As far as "this will break our system" lets give thanks to the Founding Fathers for being so prescient and design a voting system with so many safeguards to prevent the usurpation of the single most important tool in a democracy. This is why we have the Electoral College System and why we have the State Legislatures involved in this process. And that is why you will always see the bad actors that want to rig the vote to try dismantle it.
The big thing out of this is that 18% to 44% of unreturned absentee ballots were not requested to begin with. Those numbers should hold true to RETURNED absentee ballots too.
So the question now is, how many returned absentee ballots were never even requested by the real voter. Sounds like a ton.
Plus, the residential addresses that don’t actually exist.
Look at the context of what he said a minute prior.
33:32 “Now I’ve been involved with politics for a long time and I can say with confidence that in 1992 Bill Clinton was the deserved winner based on the election, in 1996 he was the deserved winner based on election for re-election, I can tell you that in 2008 and 2012 as much as it pains me to say it, Barrack Obama won those elections, but I have no confidence that Joe Biden is the deserved winner of this election, based on our findings and the current results of the election in the states of Wisconsin, Georgia and Arizona and potentially other states.” end quote at 34:15
So what he's saying goes both ways for Biden and Trump
Set them up. Ask them about covid and they'll claim they use science (no they don't), pivot to... "well then let's look at the proven science behind the fraud in the 2020 election..." haha
Like Yuri said. They'll never admit when faced with all the evidence in the world. It's not until the military boot crashes down on their ass will they understand.
Yes, I agree. However, his conclusion is that there is no way to prove this. So it sounds like the play.is to completely invalidate these states with irregularities (Fraud).
Everyone says "irregularities." Maricopa county could argue they found no evidence of "irregularities" because fraud is a regular occurrence in blue districts.
Please just look at the survey he did. It doesn't matter who he is. The results of the survey speak for themselves. These are clear, irrefutable irregularities that are resulting in sworn affidavits that are getting attached to real pleadings in real court cases. This guy is a hero and his work is invaluable.
Like the whole MSM apparatus who refuse to cover the mountain of affidavits and anamolies? That's why you guys have been stunned for 4 years about how Bad Orange Man was never kicked out of office. Your activists in the media kept telling you "open and shut case". Yet, you were never shown the other side.
He needed money to pay for the data. He started a GoFundMe. He needed 100k. When he reached 200k they cancelled him. He then moved to a different platform where he got like 600k in donations. He assembled a small and was crunching numbers for the past few weeks.
That money btw was mostly to hire call centers to do the work of calling hundreds and thousands of people to interview them about their ballot status etc
There are lesser known alternatives, but it is pretty disgusting that a crowdfunding site would shut down anyone, including this guy doing legit analysis, and also for example, shutting down Kyle Rittenhouse fund, but allowing Antifa crowdfunding.
The problem with common core isn't that it's not a valid way to teach mathematics, but that it's an invalid way to teach mathematics to the majority of students.
It's based on how a small segment of people think, most of which are female, in a stupid effort to make girls outperform boys.
Common core is just a very limited set of vedics, which you can call tricks.
For example you can multiply a couple of 2 digit numbers very quickly, sadly it only works easily for a couple of 2 digit numbers that are multiplied.
Traditional math teaches slightly more complicated standards, which we used to call properties, like the identity or distributive property. I always grew up (for example in math) with a paragraph definition and a drawn out example on the left side, and the assignment on the right side. All the way through High School.
Common core has to spend an entire chapter on a single concept now, because there's many different ways to...say...multiply a couple of 2 digit numbers. It just so happens one of those out of the entire chapter on multiplying a couple of 2 digit numbers helped you understand what took 90% of everyone before on a single day.
In his conclusion he states that even if he had a million dollars and the FBI to work through the data, it wouldn't matter. The election in those states was such a disaster it would be inconclusive.
Those states must be invalidated completely and no electors can be assigned.
No electors by popular vote. The legislature, ALONE, determines who the electors are. If they want to chicken out and say "No electors" that is their right, but it is retarded to do so.
From a criminal POV this was like a mafia boss attacking a boyscout and punching him mercilessly for a straight hour. Then the cops show up and the mafia boss yells out, "why aren't you arresting him too? He was also in the fight!"
I think a better analogy would be race horses where one decides not to bother running multiple laps and then crosses the “finish line” first. When the other riders yell that they were on their first lap and didn’t win, the whole race was called off instead of DQ the cheat.
Or bubba Wallace is in the Daytona 500, his car won’t start until the last lap. He drives around once and then does donuts after the finish line claiming he won while BLM chants his name from the stands and the media all crowns him victorious.
He shows that with how many confirmed instances of votes cast by someone other than the person who it says, over his sample size, is mind boggling. All the data is publicly available, no hidden info.
For example purpose- Let's say everyone and the court agree that his sample (remember he didn't get a hold of everyone, nor is that possible) of 1,000 people are fraudulent votes.
Now the court has to decide- Toss the 1,000 votes? Sure but it doesn't make a difference, so case dismissed. Toss, 10,000 votes? Probably not, there could be other explanations. Toss the election since it's clouded in bullshit? Harder yet.
No judge, no matter how hardline they are, wants to toss tens or hundreds of thousands of votes.
The alternative is toss the whole state election and turn things over to the Congress. As much as that is the right answer, no judge wants to the the one to make that history. Even if they are 100% on board with it as the right thing to do, they will set off a powder keg. Even city in the U.S. will burn and everyone knows it. Oh... you thought those riots were for a dead drug addict? No. They were a threat.
They burn the cities already. You want to see an entire nation burn? Have every system fail, state govs, state legislatures and judiciary...the illusion of any sort of country will be shattered for millions
It's sad that this country will fail because men and women with no spines are in the positions that could save us. We found out today that the senate didn't charge Blasey Ford with perjury simply because of "muh optics." The democrats continue to rape us and no one wants to do anything because "well it will look back in the public eye."
OANN is your line in the sand? Google has been fucking over content creators for at least 6 years. Alex Jones was one of the biggest canaries in the coal mine.
The commercial address disguising is damning and egregious by itself. I will follow up in 42min brb.
Spez: there wasn't much to add here, the disguising of addresses was the best point, all other were ancillary but contributed. Main takeaway, Braynard does not have confidence Trump actually lost, i.e. that Biden actually won.
This guy is extremely easy to listen to and comes across as very credible. Here’s hoping he’s called as a witness or does some press somewhere along the line. He is one of the better messengers we have.
Epic fucking video. I don’t care what y’all Doomers say he handled this fast, on budget, and with a clear goal to make actual shit happen. Until you have the cajones and willpower and patriotism to pull off a massive crowdsourced legal battle of historic proportions you can just sit the fuck down. This man and his team deserves a medal of freedom.
The last three weeks have proven how alone POTUS has been in govt. It was not difficult to see if you looked, but now it’s just cold and plain out in the open. Nothing to see here, folks, move along Trump. Back to the grift and kabuki for the people.
IN CONCLUSION HE HAS NO CONFIDENCE IN THE OUTCOME OF JOE BIDEN WINNING, THERE IS WIDE SPREAD FRAUD IN EVERY ASPECT HE EXAMINED AND WE ARE TURNING INTO RUSSIA
Unless "solutions" means awarding the rightful victory to Trump, I don't want to hear about "reforms". "Don't worry we'll get 'em next time guys" doesn't do it for me. I hope he's alluding to action now.
"Keep the faith" is for church. Piss on my head and tell me it's raining? There will not be a consolation prize if we get fucked in the ass but are able to say "hey, at least we didn't get discouraged." Nothing short of these illegal ballots thrown out and legal consequences for those who cheated and manipulated the law is acceptable now. This isn't a matter taken on "faith".
"We can't be like Russia." We can't just imagine our way into being a great country. We either allow ourselves to be treated like the people of Russia or we don't. We either live in a just society where laws are sacred and corruption is mercilessly prosecuted or we don't. If we are treated like the people of Russia, no amount of sunshine and rainbows is going to prevent us from becoming like them. If you don't want us to be like Russia, then fix this.
It seems the pressure to end one's video on an upbeat-and-optimistic^TM tone always overwhelms what should have ended in outrage and, figuratively, throwing shit at the walls.
Totally agree with you. Love what this guy did; he worked hard, got shit done and had excellent vision.
But he almost seems to be casting aspersions on the Dominion stuff throughout his video (I assume this is what he's referencing when he says things about "conspiracy theories"). Why do that? He also feels the need to state that Obama won fair and square in 2012 -- a position I heard him randomly bring up on War Room as well -- despite the fact that it's been suggested that's not the case.
Also, I refuse to believe the dead voter thing actually wasn't a big issue, but it seems he was looking to make all his points airtight so maybe that's why he didn't pursue.
Responding to your comment because yeah, I detect kind of a Pollyanna spirit in this guy that is not quite a match for how brazen and dastardly the left has become in their quest for power.
Edited to add: I don't want to sound like I'm crapping on this guy's efforts, because they're awesome and he did some incredible and important work. I guess it's up to the rest of us to FIGHT!
To me it just seemed like he was only looking at things that would hold up in court, thus contacting people who show as voted but claim they did not vote. From what I get out of everything going on, a lot of the other stuff going around won't hold up in court unless there's absolute solid proof.
It's the same rhetorical strategy Trump sometimes employs. Curious moderates and leftists will watch this video. If he started with the hard truth he would turn people away who aren't ready to hear that tens of millions of votes are fake and Trump flipped California. His criticism of other theories gives him credibility in their eyes. He also says "He's open to evidence" which is another trick. Anybody who watches this will find him very reasonable and optimistic. Such a person will think "He even says the results won't be overturned." But the mental seed is planted that there were "inconsistencies" and this will open them to the deeper evidence of fraud.
Dead voters are like using salt and pepper in the stew--just enough to suit your taste.
The outrageous dumps and batches of single-candidate votes and tally-switches from one side to the other are frauds that cannot be tolerated. Square the vote.
It’s also run by Marc Elias, a hard core Trump hater. He does a good job tracking the court cases but he relishes each Trump loss with glee. Please don’t use it.
Oh yea that was the case where local residents filed in an attempt to stop certification in Wayne county but since certification of votes happen the request is denied now the court saw enough evidence that they are asking the residents to refile another case with the court with their evidence. So they saw enough that they want to review the evidence in a separate case. So sounds like something good could happen with this.
It can and it is. He mentioned he wasn’t able to finish the video yesterday as planned because he was preparing declarations for the court. He also collected affidavits from people who were affected (the campaign has since taken over this task).
This election is entirely fucked. That sounds trite, but the consequences are enormous, no matter who is sworn in in January. See Matt's example about Russia. Whoever wins or loses, they have destroyed elections for decades, if not permanently.
People MUST go to jail. A lot of people. The guy who voted for Trump and requested a ballot for his deceased wife? Jail. The people involved with the bogus addresses and voting from former addresses? Jail. The people who organized this. Jail.
Points 1 and 2 don't matter. Elections are dead and no one is going to do the massive incarcerations.
I think he may have done so already and we just haven't realized it yet. In my opinion, both sides are gauging the public to see where the battle lines will be drawn. The side that has more people is clear but how to get out of this conflict with the minimal loss of life and our freedoms still in-tact remains to be seen.
The media and key figures in Big Tech also need to be held accountable. Fox was clearly in on it, as they called a state for Biden where Trump was ahead and continued to be ahead for 3 hours. It makes zero sense unless they were given a script that they had to play out, even though it didn't match with reality at the time. The higher ups need to be held accountable, ie arrested. Same with CNN and others. Google and other can be proven to have been censoring Republicans and Conservatives, which is election interference.
Biden followed a game script too. No sane observer thought Biden had a good chance to win at 10:30. Only someone with knowledge of fraud could decide not to concede with a Trump landslide and counting traditionally finishing on election night.
I don't think so. They didn't want it to be so blatant, like in Hillary's case they didn't expect Trump to get such high numbers. But they did learn from Hillary's election where their smaller scale cheating wasn't enough, so they had a contingency plan in place (pausing the count and stuffing hundreds of thousands of ballots).
Me too. Yesterday Andrea Mitchell actually declared Biden the better choice because “he is not political”
Rest assure millions listening to her agreed - meanwhile, those of us who actually think watch as Biden puts that China troll out in front as Secretary of State - in plain view.
The media is one gigantic Bagdahd Bob - we are watching the invasion of our country, live on television.
We need to blast this all over social media... It is being surpressed on reddit and twitter (of course). If you still have another social media account, go like/post/retweet/upvote or whatever you need to do to help spread it around.
We are being censored, and this is information warfare.
Perhaps someone would be dumb enough to try to steal it from mailboxes, but they're really stupid.
More likely IMO:
A lot of people, especially Rs, are going to toss it and go vote in person. Other people, like me, rarely to never check their mail and it will get lost in a pile of junk mail and tossed without ever seeing it. Then, when you go to vote, you get a provisional ballot... which gets scrutinized and is likely to get rejected.
We know that the barcodes are ridiculously easy to fake. No need to steal the ballot. Simple as pie to see online if that your bogus ballot request was approved and mailed. Print a ballot and send it in. Note that there were a fuck ton of ballots that were received before they were mailed, on the same day they were mailed, or in very close proximities that don't jive with USPS' noted inefficiency. Bonus- if you go vote in person, your provisional ballot will get tossed and the mail in ballot will be counted.
If they didn't return it and didn't vote in person, they had time after the election to analyze this data and print a ballot from the voting machines that for some reason can print ballots? Not sketchy at all...
TLDR: his findings with what little time they did have found irregularities and other issues that should raise eyebrows. There is evidence of fraud and from what can extrapolate is it is most likely a mutli front approach to it.
So, this particular analysis doesn't prove Trump won, just proves massive voter fraud. And it's just the low hanging fruit, though making all those calls wasn't easy, but still, as it goes, this analysis was the easy stuff. Except there's easier stuff.
Even easier is this: no observers allowed in contravention to the law and court orders can only mean one thing: ballot stuffing. The law breaking demonstrated in those cases is astounding, established fact, and enough to win critical court cases (if only, and only if the courts do the right thing).
Then there's the absentee and mail-in ballot envelope destruction. Destroy what we need to check after the fact equals you're cheating.
Then there's the ballot destruction. Same.
Then there's the precincts with well over 100% turnout, sometimes 350%!
Then there's the exceedingly unlikely breakdown of Biden vs Trump votes in the above.
Then there's all the dead voters. All the voters with mailing addresses that are not residential.
Then there's the fact that most of the above happened in just a handful of precincts and counties and produced just the right number of votes for Biden.
Then there's all the fun and games played by dems like picking unaffiliated applicants as Republican observers.
Then there's all the funky errors, the recounts that don't match the machine counts. The Benford's law analyses. Then there's other statistical oddities.
The lack of voter ID in many States. The lack of citizenship check at registration time in many States.
And that's almost certainly not all of it. There's lots of other nonsense, like the ballot harvesting stuff and much more.
Much of the above can be demonstrated to account for enough votes in PA/WI/MI/AZ that if you threw them out Trump wins and wins by a lot.
We can all agree Trump won about 45 states on election night. The problem at this point is how compromised are the courts(Including the SCOTUS) to flip the 270 to win.
They've done excellent work. Assuming everything was correctly executed, this video indicates fraud based on concrete facts (as opposed to weird statistical outliers). This is absolutely going to be useful in lawsuits.
I like his way of presenting things. He's not making giant promises. He's saying here's our findings, these findings warrant further investigation before we certify...if you want the cliffs notes version. I'm confident an audit with signature matching and various other methods of scrutiny would rectify the situation.
This was not a sexy video, but it has legal teeth - enough to warrant an audit or at least a legal brief.
In the end, it is the lady lawyer talking about how fucked up dominion is that will push the fraud to such levels to impact the election. Listen to what she said - that trumps defense Secretary has taken control of special forces with a speech that underscores that the threats we face may be domestic. Then Trumps 2018 EO - if trump has the bawls, and we all know he does, he would storm every media outlet, every leftist commie corrupted by dominions cash, every offshore bastard, all of them. Then after they’re thrown into a camp for a few weeks give a speech that simply says
“America, you are now safe. The globalists f’ed with lady justice and lady justice has had enough.
I must admit the comment that there is no real evidence of dead people voting, after personally finding 40 dead people voting in the states of MI and PA, is somewhat troublesome to me.
I tried reaching out to him several times, but never heard back from him. I hope he shares all his work.
I'm sure you're right but I have to give him credit for how he covered that. The problem is that government records are shit and it's really hard to conclusively verify who is dead and who isn't.
Easy example: My grandfather, my father, and I all have the same name. My grandfather is dead. If you one of on a spreadsheet and either omitted the DOB or filled in 1/1/1900, like the commies love doing, both my father and/ or I could be flagged as dead or you could argue that our votes and my vote are duplicates or triplicates if a commie votes for my grandfather.
Data and stats prove what we already know. Trump wins 2020, by a landslide.
This lawyer woman is also very convincing.
Yes, agree, not enough views imo
Youtube suppression
Share this every where dammit
Id love to, but can't get the link from the share button for some reason
Awesome video- this lady is super smart and right on target.
We need to pump these numbers up. 7k views is not nearly enough. We need international pressure
Truenintrntlprezure!
Spread it on Pornhub...I'm kind of not joking...
At least the username checks out.
this guy fucks..... maybe
lol Yeah, that's not an accurate viewcount. Wanna know how I know?
... Because now it's at 5k views.
Trueintenationuduhpressure?
This is also really good, worth the watch as well.
Wow. Excellent
She’s fucking awesome
Lol 😆
So 2 + 2 = 4 and 5?!
My God....
I thought 2016 was my favorite year.
2021 will top it, we are going to destroy them.
Quick highlights of the video:
When Trump is still president on January 21st, 2021, they will begin to destroy themselves.
Think of all the fiery trash cans and screams for reparations.
Hold up a second, I'm OK with accessing damages against the democrat party and demanding reparations for their past actions. Having survived 8 years of Clinton and 8 years of Obama, I am entitled to some reparations!
Especially those folks who have lost businesses because of Covid lockdowns. When it comes out that the Dems are responsible for commissioning it small business owners all over the country should sue.
If it came out and was generally accepted that democrats caused all the covid pain for purely political reasons I think getting sued should be the least of their worries.
True
I'm self employed. I've lost $30,000 because of the lockdowns (that's after getting a forgivable loan). My wife and I are very responsible and had 6 months in emergency expenses saved up. I wasn't that mad after the first lockdowns but I'm pretty upset now. I can't imagine what people who didn't have savings are going through.
We had some saved but a series of events from medical to a death in the family to our home getting ransacked and everything stolen down to and including the copper pipes while we were away over Christmas last year, no less, left us with saying “at least we still have the business.” Ha. Still have the business but it is tough. And it is infuriating to hear the govt call for people to only go out to buy food and medicine and doing their best to kill the holidays when many businesses might recover a bit. Then we look at GEOTUS and his example of relentless hard work, seemingly enjoying it the whole time, and always being positive in thought. Hopeful for the future and driven to work to make it good. And because of that leadership by example it’s possible to keep our minds in a healthy place and continue to work to make it through this. He has to prevail. We have to prevail.
I'll be praying for your fam and business and for others in this situation. It's criminal what they've done. My heart goes out to you.
This is what the globalists and deep state wants, they want to destroy all the progress that has been made since Obama and blame it all on a virus. That way the people might not resist as hard when loosing their businesses. It’s a cynical take I know, but most likely true.
This. I know life's not perfect. This was a big fuck you to a lot of people
We can start with, 8 more years!
I'll party for a week straight. Its my slow season anyway.
We might have to do it for them.
I will voluntarily help them destroy themselves like take vacation and sick days and everything. I'll even pack lunches.. yay
What a swell guy!!! You can for sure join me. Cmon man!!
Deal
Please seriously realize this and be prepared for January tell all of your loved ones.
Video was awesome, but was a bit discouraging to realize the the collective research done here really didn't mean shit, and is likely not even usable.
As far as statistical and voter data type stuff goes, I mean.
Will it be enough to prove in court? That’s the only hurdle the trump lawyers have to deal with now.
They nail this and the game is over. Trump for four more years.
Courts are fine until they are not. We’ve all seen corrupt judges throughout the system. If they dont play along they should get arrested too. You don’t get to defraud a Trump voter, steal an election, and then claim the victory. This is treason. Acts of war against our nation. Courts better come correct or they are enemy combatants. You never concede to treason.
Correct
judges are political when they shouldn't be. That's just how they get appointed.
What we need is a score card, judges should have penalties if their decisions get overruled in appeals. Too many of those and obviously they shouldn't remain a judge.
That is a good idea if implemented properly.
My GOP sample ballot didn’t list the local judges. When I asked about judge recommendations, 2 local GOP reps told me “we didn’t have time to vet them”. Didn’t inspire a whole bunch of confidence. A crap-load of judges are corrupted as we’re finding out.
Imagine being a local party politician and claiming 'you didn't have time'.
I don't know, maybe miss a freebie lunch or two.
This is an excellent idea and I have has similar thoughts.
I am in the UK so for obvious reasons I feel we need a civilian board that has investigation and arrest powers solely over Police and the Judiciary. Such a board should be comprised of people whose core values are freedom and individual rights. Their powers should be huge and any cop or judge should have to accept that they could be under 24/7 surveillance with monitoring of all their movements, actions and communications at any time, for any reason.
Funnily enough, Judge Dredd has this right; the judges live in fear of the 'Special Judicial Squad' who can kick down their doors at any time and treat them as guilty until proven innocent.
This might sound distasteful to some but if you want to wield power over your fellow citizens, then be prepared to be held to a higher standard. Automatic Malfeasance/Misconduct in public office charges for any breach, Life sentence if found guilty.
The problem is obviously how do you ensure the good intentions of such people? Who watches the watchers, and who watches them?
I like your idea of a 'score card'. A policeman with too low a score will find that go against them in any court case and any cases seriously impacting someone's freedom or rights would require a judge of a certain score or above.
I think Plan B is to declare insurrection.
I get that we're both angry and being a bit hyperbolic...
But you are calling for a return to an age of savagery.
Western civilization has lifted us out of both poverty and brutal violence to an astounding degree. It has done this through very important principles.
We are here to maga. That means we must return this country to the principles that made her the greatest nation on earth. Neither party has stood for that kind of integrity for far too long.
Those principles absolutely allow us, even require us, to hold these treasonous traitors accountable. They also demand that we provide them a fair trial before we execute them, and that we leave their innocent families out of it. That part dates back to the earliest days of civilization. We are not animals.
There are reasons for these principles, and very good ones. We cannot rebuild the nation we want to live in if we abandon that which made her great.
We must not allow our (righteous) anger to set us on a path that will inevitably result in the destruction of that we hold most dear.
I believe we will win this battle, but, more and more, statements like that make me fear that we will not have the mental and spiritual integrity and restraint necessary to end the war as quickly as possible and bring about the peace we actually want.
Be better than the unprincipled commies we stand against. And remember what it really means to #MAGA!
They will never fear the rope then and get out in time for next election cycle. Historically communism kills half the population. THEY DIE WE WIN.
Google the Rosenberg idiots. The wall and tree of justice hunger.
We're IN an age of savagery. Thugs roam the streets, burning looting and murdering, and when the press covers it, which is exceedingly rare, it's with an level of tacit approval bordering on overt glee. "Mostly peaceful protests" they declare, even as the reporter covering (up) the riots is spontaneously attacked by a group of piece of shit criminals hooting and whooping on by.
The ONLY reason we're not shooting it out on the streets whenever these fuckers pop up, is because one entire side insists that they're not getting involved, that the only way to win a firefight is to not shoot back no matter what, and take your death with grace knowing that you died with a firm grasp of "the high ground", whatever that's worth when your wife and kids are next once you're gone.
Really, it's an age of cuckoldry. "Please continue raping my wife, because I'm a very tolerant ally of your hostile community that explicitly hates me and would never give in to the urge to produce bad optics and make my side look worse by responding to your wanton violence committed entirely without justifiable provocation against my family. #ICantBreathe!"
Bullshit. And you know it.
Or, if you really don't get it, you belong in a home for adults of limited mental faculties, requiring supervision 24/7/365... Because it's not safe to have you roaming around any more than it's safe to let antifa roam our streets.
I agree that wearing black pajamas has turned out to be a free pass to burn, loot, and assault far too often, even if they're arrested. However, the reason we're not shooting it out on the streets is that we have a justice system that has worked reasonably well for almost 250 years. (Really, you could argue our justice system is an evolution of about 2500 years, across different state organizations.) And we know that shooting it out on the streets will undermine that justice system... And we all have a vague notion of what life would be like if we collapsed that justice system.
Hint: it will make silly white liberals larping as badasses look like what they really are: ridiculous.
We absolutely need to hold those rioters accountable; to do otherwise also undermines our justice system (just not quite as much as shooting it out in the streets). We also must to hold the DAs and mayors accountable for their part in weakening our justice system.
But you know, deep down, that, if we abandon the principles that allow our society to function, even, or perhaps especially, if others have done so first, we will let the twin sparks of liberty and justice sputter out, and rekindling them may or may not be within our power.
We must use our righteous anger to propel us into the action needed to root out this corruption, but we must not allow that anger to rule us, or we will be equally responsible for failing to act as faithful stewards of the gift of western civilization that our forbears fought and died to pass into our hands.
So what you are writing is that their families should have their citizenship revoked, be deported to some hellhole somewhere (with whatever they didn't get through theft and the like refunded), and be barred from ever returning to the USA on penalty of death. Since else they will bank on their families being able to continue somewhat as before and do their extreme evils and endangerment and sacrifice of the human species covertly until the time is opportune.
Are you a concern trolling communist shill, LARPing as a libertarian?
We managed to come through the American Revolution and the Civil War without devolving to the kind of savagery you suggest. And both involved treasonous traitors in our midst.
Are we so much weaker than our forbears, that we must resort to destroying what they gave us as we pretend to save it?
If we act with the guidance of the principles that created this nation, we can begin to rebuild trust among our countrymen. That trust amongst the majority of our citizens is what will save us, not if, but when this kind of treason is attempted again.
I know many Biden voters. Most of them still haven't accepted the truth. When they finally do, I expect their anger, at having been made fools of for so long, will match or exceed my own. I can see the doubt beginning to form in their minds. Their wrath will not be inconsequential.
As long as we act in a way that allows them to see us as estranged countrymen, rather than as savage beasts bloodletting the land, they will join us in calling for the heads of the guilty. And, for the rest of their lives, they will be among the most vigilant against fraud, either in the media or in our elections. But, if we act as the liars in media have promised them we will act, disregarding the principles we all know must guide our nation in liberty, there will be no trust, and there will be no healing this country.
Yes, we must be willing to do what must be done to secure our future, but our future will not be a place we want to live if we allow ourselves to be ruled by our anger.
Law & Order
Constitutional
What would George do? What's the right way to do this?
I hear you and agree with you for the most part however I don't think you can really make fair comparisons to the past. In the past, even if there was an enemy, they were people with morals, values, some level of honor and sense of right/wrong. They were often God fearing. The enemy of today lacks values and morals and believes in nothing but their own Godhood. They don't even have a problem ass raping kids for fun. They aren't looking to preserve their right to live the way they see fit, they are looking for a free for all chaotic destruction of everything and anything. So our forbears had themselves some tough enemies but they were no the sub-human filth we are dealing with today. They are also people who cannot be fixed or healed and they will never stop until dead.
So you are indeed a communist shill that does not believe his own writings at all whatsoever, and you are well aware of that.
What I propose is in some important regards much, much milder than those of the wars of the past, such as reg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherman's_March_to_the_Sea , where destroyed infrastructure and civilian property was not refunded. And the situations back then were extremely different from now in many absolutely critical aspects, and you are fully aware of that.
And how do you claim that deportation of the families of executed traitors are that greatly different from the exile, deportation and emigration of loyalists in the American Revolutionary War?: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)#Emigration_from_the_United_States . Many of whom most likely did not have members among them committing treasonous acts? Especially since I propose refunds?
And they would be incredibly much milder than that of actions the USA did in wars in the 20th century.
How is deportation "bloodletting the land"??? Did you copy-paste this from something you wrote previously?
These actions are not at all based on anger, but seem like the most basic of requirements to even have a chance of survival in the short term (not to mention the long term) for the USA and its people.
The forebears of the USA would have risen up in violent revolution decades ago and wet the tree of liberty like never before if they had access to the information and knowledge that is only now becoming clearer and clearer day by day. And they would have most likely changed, improved and built upon the systems based on the experiences, insights and knowledge that is now available.
And you don't believe what you write here yourself at all whatsoever. Antifa merely being "estranged" while seeking enslavement, genocide and extermination of the USA and its people? And you know fully well that it is not regular "Biden voters" this would be about.
That is not surprising coming from a communist shill.
Then we'll preemptively murder the would be murderers, and offer top protection to all judges who are threatened.
Tell that to the judge that buried her kin. I know noodles killed an assistant da.
His findings in those 3 states alone flip them to Trump. That means 269 EV each. Nobody hits 270.
If its tied then its a Contingent Election in the house and trump wins.
True. And I know Trump won and will win. But let's remember this:
The states don't have to actually FLIP, all they need to do is not get certified by the state to go to Biden. All we really have to do is keep him from getting to 270 electors and Trump wins.
Flipping or voiding AZ, GA, & WI removes the minimum # (37 out of 79) required to prevent Biden from getting to 270. I haven't heard how PA shakes out. They didn't follow procedure to legally change mail-in ballot law and didn't segregate ballots like they were supposed to. So then, once that judges agree that is the situation, then what do they do about it?
There's nothing the judge could do besides overturn the election that would be fair to the Trump campaign, assuming they demonstrate that more illegal votes were cast than the election margin.
Which I believe they can do. Especially if the judges rule that opening and counting mail in and absentee votes without observers present so blatantly violates basic principles of election integrity that the votes so counted must be invalidated. Which seems like a no brainier to me, but courts really hate invalidating votes.
We REALLY hate having our votes invalidated too.
If you cannot prove it with all the evidence we have then what is the point?
Fraud vitiates everything according to scotus.. this election couldn't be a better example of this exact principle
Precisely. Any amount of fraud cancels out legitimate votes. If so much as one vote is cancelled out by a fraudulent vote, equal protection has been violated.
Fraud vitiates everything. Yep, entire state should be invalidated.
But, after he's won, they're needs to be a full audit on every single ballot in this country. I demand to know how many votes he truly got! He deserves that number
The citizens deserve that number!
You can 100% prove a least ONE dead person votes in EVERY SINGLE STATE. Does that count as fraud?
The courts so far are requiring the Trump lawyers to prove the number if affected votes will change the election or they can't continue. That's stupid reasoning, but it's their excuse for not allowing the suits to proceed.
That’s absolutely stupid on the part of the courts considering if there was massive fraud, it took the Democrats years to organize it so in depth, and the Trump Team lawyers only had/have a few weeks to investigate and connect the dots. I still hope Trump pulls this off against those bastards.
He will.
I don’t think the courts are going to give as much credence to statistics as we are hoping. No matter how statistically improbable something is, there’s still a chance of it happening.
The simple counter-argument is that, however unlikely the result was (like 99% of independent mail ins going to Sundown Joe, for example), it happened.
Now add some additional information to the statistics, like ballots returned before they were officially mailed and observers being arbitrarily kicked out of counting locations, and maybe you hit that 51% preponderance of evidence for a civil case. But the statistics alone mean nothing, at least in court.
Stats corroborate testimony and expand the subjective argument to a larger scale. That opens the door at least to formal forensic auditing if not more extreme remedy.
Our entire justice system is based on the notion of uncertainty, e.g. reasonable doubt or preponderance of evidence. Both are fundamentally subjective standards that rest on the minds of judge or jury depending on the case. Stats help persuade, especially the kinds of extreme outliers observed over and over. The converse also holds.....evidence of fraud in the presence of statistically expected voting distributions would be persuasive against a rigged election.
It's all a persuasion game, which is why the formal deductive arguments (e.g. constitutional violations, illegal procedures etc) are lower hanging fruit.
Did you watch the video? He actually looked though people's social media to see if they were "indefinitely confined". They weren't. This has less to do with "statistics" and more to do with actually leg work.
I didn’t yet. I was just commenting generally on the efficacy of statistics being used in court.
It's a really good video. It's not about "statistics" or a lot of random conspiracy, unverified garbage you usually see here.
he lays out up front that his analysis supports the legal cases, so this is an analytical part of the case, but of course not alone, just as well say that the persuasive opinions would not stand alone, a lot of pieces need to worked together
8 more ;)
ANOTHER POLL TO FLIP. COME ON PEDES!!
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS2wnMCR/okay-pedes-another-lefty-poll-to/
Here's another: https://twitter.com/Normsmusic/status/1331442093877723137?s=20
He actually concludes that, even with all the resources in the world, he would not be able to conclusively determine who won the election. Timestamp 34:30
This is exactly what I took from his conclusion as well.
If he had a million dollars and a team of FBI agents to go through all the data he still couldn't conclude who won.. well then you must invalidate these states because the election was a fraud itself.
The problem is the courts will simply never allow this. It’s a path in that it’s theoretically possible... but... there is no way they will disenfranchise these states. This would not work like we want. It would ultimately break our entire system and we would no longer be a democracy (are we now even?). The courts simply ignores this evidence anyway. There’s no way these states are going to disenfranchise that many voters. It will have dire, permanent consequences in those states. I think at this point they have stolen it and the only way to stop the steal was to prevent certification in these states. I am not sure how to fix it at this point, Trump needs us and our support but I can’t see him having a successful term if this is how he “wins”. I think the most plausible path forward is to totally fix the voting over the next two years so this can never happen again. Democrats can’t win a fair election. I want Four (eight?) more years of Trump too, it has been glorious, but the Democrats are forcing us to essentially break the country to win at this point.
This is a good and thoughtful point, but what will be the motivation for electoral reform if this fraud is allowed to stand? If you are operating under the premise that fraud did in fact happen, you have to also project the logical consequences of permitting the fraud to happen.
If the fraud stands, Biden has zero incentive to sign off on electoral reform, and the fraudulent states, who are ultimately responsible for their elections, have zero incentive to reform their systems. The only way to get electoral reform is 1) win now and 2) punish the fraudulent states by robbing them of their apparent victory, either through Trump electors or invalidating the election results.
Make sure to compare apples to apples. Trump having a "less than successful term" should be compared to the Democrats receiving carte blanche to conduct elections on their terms, effectively disenfranchising millions of voters within states and across the country, destroying faith in the electoral process, and potentially opening the floodgates to a torrent of leftist attacks on 1A and 2A, citizenship, the court system, and so forth. And THAT could easily lead to civil war.
It's a Czechoslovakia moment: At a certain point you must take a stand, despite the difficulties, in order to prevent worse from happening. The fraud of 2020 has brought the old order to an end, and now we must fight to determine what the new order will look like.
This is a false argument. The whole "disenfranchise" word is a political psyop. First of all lets be sure of what we're talking about
The key here is legal. Every illegal, fraudulent, double vote disenfranchises the entire voter base. Every such vote makes every other vote diluted. Therefore the entire "we will disenfranchise the voter" point is moot. By having any aforementioned votes in the election you have already disenfranchised every single person that voted. So lets stop with the parroting political psyop nonsense.
As far as "this will break our system" lets give thanks to the Founding Fathers for being so prescient and design a voting system with so many safeguards to prevent the usurpation of the single most important tool in a democracy. This is why we have the Electoral College System and why we have the State Legislatures involved in this process. And that is why you will always see the bad actors that want to rig the vote to try dismantle it.
They will break the country either way. He will want to win, whatever it takes.
We aren’t working now. Breaking it is the necessity
The big thing out of this is that 18% to 44% of unreturned absentee ballots were not requested to begin with. Those numbers should hold true to RETURNED absentee ballots too.
So the question now is, how many returned absentee ballots were never even requested by the real voter. Sounds like a ton.
Plus, the residential addresses that don’t actually exist.
A mathematician estimated from Braynard's data the following, in PA alone:
37,001 - 58,914 registered Republican absentee identities stolen (requested by someone other than the voter)
38,910 - 56,483 registered Republican absentee ballots "disappeared" after being sent in
Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/mathematics-prof-says-sworn-statement-many-56000-gop-ballots-pa-may-be
Oh, we know who won
Look at the context of what he said a minute prior.
33:32 “Now I’ve been involved with politics for a long time and I can say with confidence that in 1992 Bill Clinton was the deserved winner based on the election, in 1996 he was the deserved winner based on election for re-election, I can tell you that in 2008 and 2012 as much as it pains me to say it, Barrack Obama won those elections, but I have no confidence that Joe Biden is the deserved winner of this election, based on our findings and the current results of the election in the states of Wisconsin, Georgia and Arizona and potentially other states.” end quote at 34:15
So what he's saying goes both ways for Biden and Trump
Fuck communists
Again for the folks in the back!
FUCK COMMUNISTS
FUCK COMMUNISTS
FUCK COMMUNISTS
F U C K
C O M M U N I S T S
What?
(coughs)
I said
FUCK COMMUNISTS
Kek.
I heard you the first time. I just wanted to hear you say it again.
I'll keep saying it until I die, and with pride!
ohaha i see what you did there . . . top kek
Im a simple man. I see communists getting fucked. I upTrump.
FUCK COMMUNISTS
I know.
I just wanted to hear someone say it again.
;)
FUCK COMMUNISTS!
Again for the folks in the back back!
🚫☭🚫☭🚫☭🚫☭🚫☭🚫☭🚫
Fucking Fuck Them
Can we not? I mean they don't shower and probably have multiples STD's. How about we fly them in helicopters over the Marianas Trench?
They not only have STDs, they celebrate them proudly
Deserves a billion up votes!!!
ANOTHER POLL TO FLIP. COME ON PEDES!!
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS2wnMCR/okay-pedes-another-lefty-poll-to/
Thank you Matt! The court's cannot deny the mathematical proof.
2+2=5
3 + 1 = racism
Peanut butter = racism
This lady disagrees
This is exactly why I refuse to ever live in a city. They are all swarming with peanut butter people.
Set them up. Ask them about covid and they'll claim they use science (no they don't), pivot to... "well then let's look at the proven science behind the fraud in the 2020 election..." haha
Sure they can, they just say "nu-uh" like the trained and blackmailed seals that they are.
Like Yuri said. They'll never admit when faced with all the evidence in the world. It's not until the military boot crashes down on their ass will they understand.
Yes, I agree. However, his conclusion is that there is no way to prove this. So it sounds like the play.is to completely invalidate these states with irregularities (Fraud).
Everyone says "irregularities." Maricopa county could argue they found no evidence of "irregularities" because fraud is a regular occurrence in blue districts.
Shut up. Math is racist, don’t you dare oppress me, rEEEEEEEeeeeeEEEEE333333Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Who is this guy?
Was one of POTUS' number guys in 2016. Now freelancing and helping 2020 informally.
Thanks
Numbers are not biased.
Please just look at the survey he did. It doesn't matter who he is. The results of the survey speak for themselves. These are clear, irrefutable irregularities that are resulting in sworn affidavits that are getting attached to real pleadings in real court cases. This guy is a hero and his work is invaluable.
Like the whole MSM apparatus who refuse to cover the mountain of affidavits and anamolies? That's why you guys have been stunned for 4 years about how Bad Orange Man was never kicked out of office. Your activists in the media kept telling you "open and shut case". Yet, you were never shown the other side.
Which part specifically is he showing his bias.
Data scientist... he worked on the 2016 campaign, and I think that he was tapped by the 2020 campaign the day after the election.
Interesting, thanks
He needed money to pay for the data. He started a GoFundMe. He needed 100k. When he reached 200k they cancelled him. He then moved to a different platform where he got like 600k in donations. He assembled a small and was crunching numbers for the past few weeks.
That money btw was mostly to hire call centers to do the work of calling hundreds and thousands of people to interview them about their ballot status etc
I remember this story now! WTF GoFundMe, is there no alternative?
I think i heard him say sendpaygo in the start of his findings video
He used givesendgo
There are lesser known alternatives, but it is pretty disgusting that a crowdfunding site would shut down anyone, including this guy doing legit analysis, and also for example, shutting down Kyle Rittenhouse fund, but allowing Antifa crowdfunding.
He used an alternative. Conservatives should boycott GoFundMe.
Math mean nothing to party of common core.
Hope some beautiful stats guy can ELI5 to whatever judge hears the case.
Common core actually helped me learn to do math in my head, don’t downvote me plz
The problem with common core isn't that it's not a valid way to teach mathematics, but that it's an invalid way to teach mathematics to the majority of students.
It's based on how a small segment of people think, most of which are female, in a stupid effort to make girls outperform boys.
It HEAVILY emphasizes the distributive principle.
I kinda did things that way Common Core explains before CC was even a thing. Didn't mean nothin' by it.
Common core is just a very limited set of vedics, which you can call tricks.
For example you can multiply a couple of 2 digit numbers very quickly, sadly it only works easily for a couple of 2 digit numbers that are multiplied.
Traditional math teaches slightly more complicated standards, which we used to call properties, like the identity or distributive property. I always grew up (for example in math) with a paragraph definition and a drawn out example on the left side, and the assignment on the right side. All the way through High School.
Common core has to spend an entire chapter on a single concept now, because there's many different ways to...say...multiply a couple of 2 digit numbers. It just so happens one of those out of the entire chapter on multiplying a couple of 2 digit numbers helped you understand what took 90% of everyone before on a single day.
I cant understand how they teach it.
Like it makes no sense whatsoever to see it written. It looks like someone making a joke about math who somehow gets the answer right.
But it's how I've done math in my head since the 90s (when I was learning my multiplication tables, afaik common core was not a thing).
It's 2020. Math is racist now.
Hysterical screeching always trumps math and logic
This is not what I got from his video at all.
In his conclusion he states that even if he had a million dollars and the FBI to work through the data, it wouldn't matter. The election in those states was such a disaster it would be inconclusive.
Those states must be invalidated completely and no electors can be assigned.
No electors by popular vote. The legislature, ALONE, determines who the electors are. If they want to chicken out and say "No electors" that is their right, but it is retarded to do so.
Ding ding ding
This wasn't a shoddy election, this was a rigged election. This has totally different legal implications.
You don't ignore the guilty party if there is only one guilty party, you punish them and only them.
From a criminal POV this was like a mafia boss attacking a boyscout and punching him mercilessly for a straight hour. Then the cops show up and the mafia boss yells out, "why aren't you arresting him too? He was also in the fight!"
I think a better analogy would be race horses where one decides not to bother running multiple laps and then crosses the “finish line” first. When the other riders yell that they were on their first lap and didn’t win, the whole race was called off instead of DQ the cheat.
Or bubba Wallace is in the Daytona 500, his car won’t start until the last lap. He drives around once and then does donuts after the finish line claiming he won while BLM chants his name from the stands and the media all crowns him victorious.
But can't the court invalidate a state if the election was run so poorly that there is no confidence in the vote?
I would think they could. I believe it’s happened before on smaller elections.
How do you figure?
He shows that with how many confirmed instances of votes cast by someone other than the person who it says, over his sample size, is mind boggling. All the data is publicly available, no hidden info.
The question is how many were willing to sign affidavits though.
For example purpose- Let's say everyone and the court agree that his sample (remember he didn't get a hold of everyone, nor is that possible) of 1,000 people are fraudulent votes.
Now the court has to decide- Toss the 1,000 votes? Sure but it doesn't make a difference, so case dismissed. Toss, 10,000 votes? Probably not, there could be other explanations. Toss the election since it's clouded in bullshit? Harder yet.
No judge, no matter how hardline they are, wants to toss tens or hundreds of thousands of votes.
The alternative is toss the whole state election and turn things over to the Congress. As much as that is the right answer, no judge wants to the the one to make that history. Even if they are 100% on board with it as the right thing to do, they will set off a powder keg. Even city in the U.S. will burn and everyone knows it. Oh... you thought those riots were for a dead drug addict? No. They were a threat.
They burn the cities already. You want to see an entire nation burn? Have every system fail, state govs, state legislatures and judiciary...the illusion of any sort of country will be shattered for millions
Again, it's Czechoslovakia, 1938. I would rather have cities rioting under Trump than AOC making lists under Biden.
It's sad that this country will fail because men and women with no spines are in the positions that could save us. We found out today that the senate didn't charge Blasey Ford with perjury simply because of "muh optics." The democrats continue to rape us and no one wants to do anything because "well it will look back in the public eye."
State delegation vote. Each state gets one vote in house. GOP controls 33 states in house.
We have to start using Rumble or Bitchute instead of Youtube, guys. Youtube just booted OANN.
OANN is your line in the sand? Google has been fucking over content creators for at least 6 years. Alex Jones was one of the biggest canaries in the coal mine.
no, just another example of why
Is Rumble owned by the Parler owner dude? I always see him pushing Rumble on Twitter.
I know Dan Bongino has a significant financial stake in both Rumble and Parlor.
good question
Twitch.
Twitch is owned by Amazon. Amazon (Jeff Bezos) also owns The Washington Post.
Twitch is the biggest Blue Haired Warrior club in social media. The staff are already compromised by ultra leftist ideologues.
The commercial address disguising is damning and egregious by itself. I will follow up in 42min brb.
Spez: there wasn't much to add here, the disguising of addresses was the best point, all other were ancillary but contributed. Main takeaway, Braynard does not have confidence Trump actually lost, i.e. that Biden actually won.
It’s been over an hour. Where’s your follow up?
This guy is extremely easy to listen to and comes across as very credible. Here’s hoping he’s called as a witness or does some press somewhere along the line. He is one of the better messengers we have.
Let's go!
Epic fucking video. I don’t care what y’all Doomers say he handled this fast, on budget, and with a clear goal to make actual shit happen. Until you have the cajones and willpower and patriotism to pull off a massive crowdsourced legal battle of historic proportions you can just sit the fuck down. This man and his team deserves a medal of freedom.
Put the levers are ever so much longer. Fewer and fewer people can oversee and examine so much more.
Snowden had access to things no one should, and he was a little contractor in Hawaii.
Obama's team was offloading NSA datalakes and querying them anonymously, completely circumventing FBI requirements.
Anyone anywhere can blow the whole thing up. Our guys are hired on merit, theirs are nepotism affirmative action hires passing purity tests.
We win. They lose.
Sorry kinda hopped up on carrot juice, I could smash a table right now.
Relevant username?
At least a frighten FISA tap (totally legally alrighty apparently) on the conspirators.
This shouldn’t be that hard. There are plenty of not smart people involved.
The last three weeks have proven how alone POTUS has been in govt. It was not difficult to see if you looked, but now it’s just cold and plain out in the open. Nothing to see here, folks, move along Trump. Back to the grift and kabuki for the people.
Not with the FBI and CIA spying on everything the good guys do. I suspect this is part of the reason why Bill Barr is so inactive.
IN CONCLUSION HE HAS NO CONFIDENCE IN THE OUTCOME OF JOE BIDEN WINNING, THERE IS WIDE SPREAD FRAUD IN EVERY ASPECT HE EXAMINED AND WE ARE TURNING INTO RUSSIA
Some dubious phrases in his closing:
Unless "solutions" means awarding the rightful victory to Trump, I don't want to hear about "reforms". "Don't worry we'll get 'em next time guys" doesn't do it for me. I hope he's alluding to action now.
"Keep the faith" is for church. Piss on my head and tell me it's raining? There will not be a consolation prize if we get fucked in the ass but are able to say "hey, at least we didn't get discouraged." Nothing short of these illegal ballots thrown out and legal consequences for those who cheated and manipulated the law is acceptable now. This isn't a matter taken on "faith".
"We can't be like Russia." We can't just imagine our way into being a great country. We either allow ourselves to be treated like the people of Russia or we don't. We either live in a just society where laws are sacred and corruption is mercilessly prosecuted or we don't. If we are treated like the people of Russia, no amount of sunshine and rainbows is going to prevent us from becoming like them. If you don't want us to be like Russia, then fix this.
It seems the pressure to end one's video on an upbeat-and-optimistic^TM tone always overwhelms what should have ended in outrage and, figuratively, throwing shit at the walls.
Totally agree with you. Love what this guy did; he worked hard, got shit done and had excellent vision.
But he almost seems to be casting aspersions on the Dominion stuff throughout his video (I assume this is what he's referencing when he says things about "conspiracy theories"). Why do that? He also feels the need to state that Obama won fair and square in 2012 -- a position I heard him randomly bring up on War Room as well -- despite the fact that it's been suggested that's not the case.
Also, I refuse to believe the dead voter thing actually wasn't a big issue, but it seems he was looking to make all his points airtight so maybe that's why he didn't pursue.
Responding to your comment because yeah, I detect kind of a Pollyanna spirit in this guy that is not quite a match for how brazen and dastardly the left has become in their quest for power.
Edited to add: I don't want to sound like I'm crapping on this guy's efforts, because they're awesome and he did some incredible and important work. I guess it's up to the rest of us to FIGHT!
To me it just seemed like he was only looking at things that would hold up in court, thus contacting people who show as voted but claim they did not vote. From what I get out of everything going on, a lot of the other stuff going around won't hold up in court unless there's absolute solid proof.
It's the same rhetorical strategy Trump sometimes employs. Curious moderates and leftists will watch this video. If he started with the hard truth he would turn people away who aren't ready to hear that tens of millions of votes are fake and Trump flipped California. His criticism of other theories gives him credibility in their eyes. He also says "He's open to evidence" which is another trick. Anybody who watches this will find him very reasonable and optimistic. Such a person will think "He even says the results won't be overturned." But the mental seed is planted that there were "inconsistencies" and this will open them to the deeper evidence of fraud.
Dead voters are like using salt and pepper in the stew--just enough to suit your taste.
The outrageous dumps and batches of single-candidate votes and tally-switches from one side to the other are frauds that cannot be tolerated. Square the vote.
Guys, what happened to that court pdf that was stickied? I have it copied, but it seemed a big deal and just disappeared?
This one: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/162245-2020-11-23-or.pdf
Dude, it was literally stickied. Copy it and put it into google if you need to.
The link is good. Sorry. So many viruses etc have been added lately everyone is shy of new accounts.
Its cool man
You trying to sound cool by calling him a shill?
It’s also run by Marc Elias, a hard core Trump hater. He does a good job tracking the court cases but he relishes each Trump loss with glee. Please don’t use it.
Scan it on VirusTotal dot com
Not every brand new account is suspect, the link is good.
Oh yea that was the case where local residents filed in an attempt to stop certification in Wayne county but since certification of votes happen the request is denied now the court saw enough evidence that they are asking the residents to refile another case with the court with their evidence. So they saw enough that they want to review the evidence in a separate case. So sounds like something good could happen with this.
It's alright; they asked us to refile now that they certified and get fast-tracked to MI SC.
Thats what i figured, for some reason the post wouldnt show up again for me so i was like wth?
Thanks man
like 5 posts down on the front page https://thedonald.win/p/11QS2uVkLQ/michigan-supreme-court-finds-t/c/
For some reason its not pulling up for me. Thank you
Thanks for the hard work you put in, man. You are a 2020 Legend!
I will definitely listen to this on my way to NC tomorrow for the FAMILY REUNION!
Yes there will be Turkey!
Hold the Line fellas!!!!
Can this be used by any of Trump’s legal challenges? Or is it just being put out there?
Statistical evidence is valid court evidence.
Who knows if Rudy will use it though. I wish we had some of these guys on the legal team.
He said he sent the data and affadavits to Trump's legal team.
That's great!
These guys worked for the team in 2016, so I imagine Rudy has it.
It can and it is. He mentioned he wasn’t able to finish the video yesterday as planned because he was preparing declarations for the court. He also collected affidavits from people who were affected (the campaign has since taken over this task).
My two conclusions:
This election is entirely fucked. That sounds trite, but the consequences are enormous, no matter who is sworn in in January. See Matt's example about Russia. Whoever wins or loses, they have destroyed elections for decades, if not permanently.
People MUST go to jail. A lot of people. The guy who voted for Trump and requested a ballot for his deceased wife? Jail. The people involved with the bogus addresses and voting from former addresses? Jail. The people who organized this. Jail.
Points 1 and 2 don't matter. Elections are dead and no one is going to do the massive incarcerations.
Where does that leave us?
Trump crosses the Rubicon, or it’s over.
I think he may have done so already and we just haven't realized it yet. In my opinion, both sides are gauging the public to see where the battle lines will be drawn. The side that has more people is clear but how to get out of this conflict with the minimal loss of life and our freedoms still in-tact remains to be seen.
The media and key figures in Big Tech also need to be held accountable. Fox was clearly in on it, as they called a state for Biden where Trump was ahead and continued to be ahead for 3 hours. It makes zero sense unless they were given a script that they had to play out, even though it didn't match with reality at the time. The higher ups need to be held accountable, ie arrested. Same with CNN and others. Google and other can be proven to have been censoring Republicans and Conservatives, which is election interference.
Biden followed a game script too. No sane observer thought Biden had a good chance to win at 10:30. Only someone with knowledge of fraud could decide not to concede with a Trump landslide and counting traditionally finishing on election night.
Death for everyone
I don't think so. They didn't want it to be so blatant, like in Hillary's case they didn't expect Trump to get such high numbers. But they did learn from Hillary's election where their smaller scale cheating wasn't enough, so they had a contingency plan in place (pausing the count and stuffing hundreds of thousands of ballots).
Me too. Yesterday Andrea Mitchell actually declared Biden the better choice because “he is not political”
Rest assure millions listening to her agreed - meanwhile, those of us who actually think watch as Biden puts that China troll out in front as Secretary of State - in plain view.
The media is one gigantic Bagdahd Bob - we are watching the invasion of our country, live on television.
Wtf!?
Thank you Matt!
We need to blast this all over social media... It is being surpressed on reddit and twitter (of course). If you still have another social media account, go like/post/retweet/upvote or whatever you need to do to help spread it around.
We are being censored, and this is information warfare.
A Must Watch....
Just me or is the sound super low? I can barley hear him.
It creates a live ballot.
Perhaps someone would be dumb enough to try to steal it from mailboxes, but they're really stupid.
More likely IMO:
A lot of people, especially Rs, are going to toss it and go vote in person. Other people, like me, rarely to never check their mail and it will get lost in a pile of junk mail and tossed without ever seeing it. Then, when you go to vote, you get a provisional ballot... which gets scrutinized and is likely to get rejected.
We know that the barcodes are ridiculously easy to fake. No need to steal the ballot. Simple as pie to see online if that your bogus ballot request was approved and mailed. Print a ballot and send it in. Note that there were a fuck ton of ballots that were received before they were mailed, on the same day they were mailed, or in very close proximities that don't jive with USPS' noted inefficiency. Bonus- if you go vote in person, your provisional ballot will get tossed and the mail in ballot will be counted.
If you can, check the website to see if they were "turned in" and "signature verified".
If they didn't return it and didn't vote in person, they had time after the election to analyze this data and print a ballot from the voting machines that for some reason can print ballots? Not sketchy at all...
They spread a really wide net, that is why.
TLDR: his findings with what little time they did have found irregularities and other issues that should raise eyebrows. There is evidence of fraud and from what can extrapolate is it is most likely a mutli front approach to it.
Video not loading... big tech fascists strike again
You have to tap on the text to play. If you tap the play button it gives an error for some reason.
Anyone else thinking, "never sit with the back of your head pointed at the window while your exposing the deep state"?
The fucking Wisconsin Indefinitely Confined voting numbers, goddamn. Lock these fucking criminals up.
That one chart was incredible.
This is professionally weaponized autism.
So, this particular analysis doesn't prove Trump won, just proves massive voter fraud. And it's just the low hanging fruit, though making all those calls wasn't easy, but still, as it goes, this analysis was the easy stuff. Except there's easier stuff.
Even easier is this: no observers allowed in contravention to the law and court orders can only mean one thing: ballot stuffing. The law breaking demonstrated in those cases is astounding, established fact, and enough to win critical court cases (if only, and only if the courts do the right thing).
Then there's the absentee and mail-in ballot envelope destruction. Destroy what we need to check after the fact equals you're cheating.
Then there's the ballot destruction. Same.
Then there's the precincts with well over 100% turnout, sometimes 350%!
Then there's the exceedingly unlikely breakdown of Biden vs Trump votes in the above.
Then there's all the dead voters. All the voters with mailing addresses that are not residential.
Then there's the fact that most of the above happened in just a handful of precincts and counties and produced just the right number of votes for Biden.
Then there's all the fun and games played by dems like picking unaffiliated applicants as Republican observers.
Then there's all the funky errors, the recounts that don't match the machine counts. The Benford's law analyses. Then there's other statistical oddities.
The lack of voter ID in many States. The lack of citizenship check at registration time in many States.
And that's almost certainly not all of it. There's lots of other nonsense, like the ballot harvesting stuff and much more.
Much of the above can be demonstrated to account for enough votes in PA/WI/MI/AZ that if you threw them out Trump wins and wins by a lot.
CliffsNotes are handy. Thanks.
What an absolute Big Brain Chad!! And his team is super awesome too <3
I donated to the Go Fund Me (which was taken down) and the GiveSendGo fund. SO glad I did. This report was well worth the contribution and the wait.
I really hope the findings will add evidentiary legitimacy to the court cases coming up.
Pedes.. this view count is fucking pathetic. SEND THIS TO YOUR FUCKING FRIENDS, ENEMIES, FAMILY, HOOKERS, TINDERELLAS, ETC.
We can all agree Trump won about 45 states on election night. The problem at this point is how compromised are the courts(Including the SCOTUS) to flip the 270 to win.
They've done excellent work. Assuming everything was correctly executed, this video indicates fraud based on concrete facts (as opposed to weird statistical outliers). This is absolutely going to be useful in lawsuits.
Back up and store this
I like his way of presenting things. He's not making giant promises. He's saying here's our findings, these findings warrant further investigation before we certify...if you want the cliffs notes version. I'm confident an audit with signature matching and various other methods of scrutiny would rectify the situation.
This was not a sexy video, but it has legal teeth - enough to warrant an audit or at least a legal brief.
In the end, it is the lady lawyer talking about how fucked up dominion is that will push the fraud to such levels to impact the election. Listen to what she said - that trumps defense Secretary has taken control of special forces with a speech that underscores that the threats we face may be domestic. Then Trumps 2018 EO - if trump has the bawls, and we all know he does, he would storm every media outlet, every leftist commie corrupted by dominions cash, every offshore bastard, all of them. Then after they’re thrown into a camp for a few weeks give a speech that simply says
“America, you are now safe. The globalists f’ed with lady justice and lady justice has had enough.
Get back to work.”
It's embarrassing that simple recommendations for election reform, like fingerprints, are things already done in third world countries like India.
This video has to be the best explanation of the fraud that has been going on that is presented in layman's terms. Keep the faith.
They thought 80 million people were so stupid (as Trump voters) that we never would have figured this out.
They were the stupid ones...
I must admit the comment that there is no real evidence of dead people voting, after personally finding 40 dead people voting in the states of MI and PA, is somewhat troublesome to me.
I tried reaching out to him several times, but never heard back from him. I hope he shares all his work.
Don't give up. He was overwhelmed with people reaching out. How did you verify. Are you able to share your data?
I'm sure you're right but I have to give him credit for how he covered that. The problem is that government records are shit and it's really hard to conclusively verify who is dead and who isn't.
Easy example: My grandfather, my father, and I all have the same name. My grandfather is dead. If you one of on a spreadsheet and either omitted the DOB or filled in 1/1/1900, like the commies love doing, both my father and/ or I could be flagged as dead or you could argue that our votes and my vote are duplicates or triplicates if a commie votes for my grandfather.
By crowd sourcing more than 10k people were found no? I remember seeing a video about it.
I was told only stupid people support Trump. Lied to again, damnit.
You only believed it cuz ur stupid /s