I always wonder, who is the person at the top? People always talk about Rockefeller and the Rothschild's, but I think that the most powerful person in the world we will likely never know about. Some shadowy person who is hidden by everyone else we focus on. Heck, for our purposes it could be your neighbor Jacob Graham.
Never trust a man with pocket turtles! Seriously though, I've often wondered the same thing. The real apex player(s) is/are almost certainly unknown/hidden from us. My outside guess was that it's the likes of a descendant of a powerful Renaissance family clan like the Medici's, Borgia's or even the Sforza's. Families that supposedly dissipated but were around hundreds of years before the Rothschild or Payseur. Rockefeller is a young fawn of a dynasty by comparison to the aforementioned.
Thats what I'm thinking, some European dude who has old money but was smart enough to never speak about it. He's got the blackmail and the cash and rules the world. He might have even been the polite older gentlemen that you ran into in that Paris cafe. You'd never know.
Maybe it’s a circle. Maybe the top is us. Maybe it just took us this long to figure it all out. We won 2016. We won so much we almost got tired of winning but kept on winning. Then we won the election again in 2020. Now, we are winning the information war. Despite everything in that image. Despite everything above us, we are winning. I think it's not a linear hierarchy. This is a circle and the harder they try to stay on top the harder we must keep the wheels on this train spinning to keep them down.
In the book "How to Win Friends and Influence People," Carnegie writes the importance of understanding how everyone is right and justified in their own mind regardless of the crime. The example used in the book was of Al Capone, who, even while being arrested, stated all he did was offer a service to the community, and did what he had to do to make his business survive. The FBI profiling of serial killers show this: people can justify their evil deeds. So how does this apply to George Soros?
I believe that growing up a Jew, and being occupied by Nazis, George did what he had to do to survive: he teamed up with the Nazis. But I don't think he particularly liked them. Sure, maybe he made some friends, and maybe he made some coin, but my theory is that George saw the nazi occupation as an evil act upon the world, and sought out to ensure no other empire would ever rise like Nazi Germany.
So, being the "superhero" of his own mind, he amassed great wealth, made elite friends, and banded his new friends around this "passion" of an idea he's had for 60 years: if we have a centralized one world government, then not only can we stop the rise of radical movements like Nazis, but we can prevent other world wars.
But how to get to a one world government? Easy: shatter the current world powers. Start by bringing down Soviet Russia through market trades, then toppling various african and eastern european countries as practice, then move on to Southern America. And while China may never buy into your idea, they certainly will back the toppling of America, so why not use China as an ally for now? Because certainly if you take down America, you take down China, so that's a problem for another day (much like how the US had the same idea when teaming with Soviet Russia to take down Germany).
So, if we apply what Jordan Peterson calls "compassionate ignorance" or CS Lewis calls them "omnipotent busy bodies" where people may be motivated to do good in their mind, but but end up doing more harm, we get a group of elites who bought into this young Jewish boys childhood, the trauma, the passion turned into life's mission. It would explain why people like Mark Zuckerberg, or Obama, or the CIA, would rally to a cause: they all believe it's better for humanity. Plus, they all keep their power and get even more rich. It's sprinkling holy water over stolen gold coins and calling yourself robinhood: you truck yourself into believing your cause is righteous.
He's like Magneto or Thanos where he's the hero of his own story, but really a villain willing to wipe out humanity to achieve his goal.
To me, this is the most realistic storyline. And as a christian, I believe the devil would see this person and corrupt them even further. So he's like Gollum, who's life is prolonged by evil, and grows more obsessed over time.
We know, from the bible, that someday the world will be ruled by a one world like government. I think the devil just empowers people to bring this goal closer and closer.
I like that. Soros could be doing it with a misguided sense of justice and order. But in the end all it will do is send the world further into Satan's grip.
I saw this post which reminded me. I always wondered what Maria's connection was. It is here Klaus Schwab. Along with manyothers such as Zuckerberg, Alexander Soros, Crenshaw, Mayor Pete, Macron, Tulsi among others...
When I first became a believer, I read the scripture that says "They will put you to death and think they're doing God a favor " and thought how could that be? Now I see,, and I agree with you-they honestly BELIEVE they are doing the right thing. Pride and greed eventually take over, though, when you are not aligned with the will of God, and things get ugly. I think Biden's toast, for example, but AOC is still an idealist. Both are dangerous and must be resisted,, but there may be hope for the latter. Just my thoughts.
I always wonder, who is the person at the top? People always talk about Rockefeller and the Rothschild's, but I think that the most powerful person in the world we will likely never know about. Some shadowy person who is hidden by everyone else we focus on. Heck, for our purposes it could be your neighbor Jacob Graham.
It’s Jeb
Never trust a man with pocket turtles! Seriously though, I've often wondered the same thing. The real apex player(s) is/are almost certainly unknown/hidden from us. My outside guess was that it's the likes of a descendant of a powerful Renaissance family clan like the Medici's, Borgia's or even the Sforza's. Families that supposedly dissipated but were around hundreds of years before the Rothschild or Payseur. Rockefeller is a young fawn of a dynasty by comparison to the aforementioned.
Requiescat In Pace
AC2 was a great game!
Thats what I'm thinking, some European dude who has old money but was smart enough to never speak about it. He's got the blackmail and the cash and rules the world. He might have even been the polite older gentlemen that you ran into in that Paris cafe. You'd never know.
Maybe it’s a circle. Maybe the top is us. Maybe it just took us this long to figure it all out. We won 2016. We won so much we almost got tired of winning but kept on winning. Then we won the election again in 2020. Now, we are winning the information war. Despite everything in that image. Despite everything above us, we are winning. I think it's not a linear hierarchy. This is a circle and the harder they try to stay on top the harder we must keep the wheels on this train spinning to keep them down.
It's not a person at the top. Satan himself is at the very top of their hierarchy, and the next few levels down are filled by various principalities.
The answer is easy: George Soros
Edit: Hey cmon what's with the downvote, It was a good guess.
George Soros is wealthy and evil, but he's just one player, he's most definitely not the top dog.
My theory is this:
In the book "How to Win Friends and Influence People," Carnegie writes the importance of understanding how everyone is right and justified in their own mind regardless of the crime. The example used in the book was of Al Capone, who, even while being arrested, stated all he did was offer a service to the community, and did what he had to do to make his business survive. The FBI profiling of serial killers show this: people can justify their evil deeds. So how does this apply to George Soros?
I believe that growing up a Jew, and being occupied by Nazis, George did what he had to do to survive: he teamed up with the Nazis. But I don't think he particularly liked them. Sure, maybe he made some friends, and maybe he made some coin, but my theory is that George saw the nazi occupation as an evil act upon the world, and sought out to ensure no other empire would ever rise like Nazi Germany.
So, being the "superhero" of his own mind, he amassed great wealth, made elite friends, and banded his new friends around this "passion" of an idea he's had for 60 years: if we have a centralized one world government, then not only can we stop the rise of radical movements like Nazis, but we can prevent other world wars.
But how to get to a one world government? Easy: shatter the current world powers. Start by bringing down Soviet Russia through market trades, then toppling various african and eastern european countries as practice, then move on to Southern America. And while China may never buy into your idea, they certainly will back the toppling of America, so why not use China as an ally for now? Because certainly if you take down America, you take down China, so that's a problem for another day (much like how the US had the same idea when teaming with Soviet Russia to take down Germany).
So, if we apply what Jordan Peterson calls "compassionate ignorance" or CS Lewis calls them "omnipotent busy bodies" where people may be motivated to do good in their mind, but but end up doing more harm, we get a group of elites who bought into this young Jewish boys childhood, the trauma, the passion turned into life's mission. It would explain why people like Mark Zuckerberg, or Obama, or the CIA, would rally to a cause: they all believe it's better for humanity. Plus, they all keep their power and get even more rich. It's sprinkling holy water over stolen gold coins and calling yourself robinhood: you truck yourself into believing your cause is righteous.
He's like Magneto or Thanos where he's the hero of his own story, but really a villain willing to wipe out humanity to achieve his goal.
To me, this is the most realistic storyline. And as a christian, I believe the devil would see this person and corrupt them even further. So he's like Gollum, who's life is prolonged by evil, and grows more obsessed over time.
We know, from the bible, that someday the world will be ruled by a one world like government. I think the devil just empowers people to bring this goal closer and closer.
I like that. Soros could be doing it with a misguided sense of justice and order. But in the end all it will do is send the world further into Satan's grip.
Some Payseur probably
Holy crap. They are all intertwined . They had to cheat to win and they didn't care if we knew it.
We are over target boys they know they are fucked
This was Assange's final tweet?
Come on Trump, Pardon Assange and Snowden!
Then hire them to fight against the Dems. Can you imagine? REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!
Yasssss. This and The Tragedy and Hope Analysis by Plummer.
I saw this post which reminded me. I always wondered what Maria's connection was. It is here Klaus Schwab. Along with manyothers such as Zuckerberg, Alexander Soros, Crenshaw, Mayor Pete, Macron, Tulsi among others...
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS2tOAhk/mattdamon420/
See those strings
Here's a bigger version of this
I want a Randy Quaid version of this.
This reminds me of the ‘crackpot conspiracy theory’ activist character who was arrested on the show Barney Miller. He laid the whole thing out, back in 1981.
I never saw this before, but it is eye opening. Thanks for sharing!
Interesting face to see is Maria Bartiromo. She, along with Lou, have given the most coverage of the election fraud.
Agree, they have done more than any others from MSM.
When I first became a believer, I read the scripture that says "They will put you to death and think they're doing God a favor " and thought how could that be? Now I see,, and I agree with you-they honestly BELIEVE they are doing the right thing. Pride and greed eventually take over, though, when you are not aligned with the will of God, and things get ugly. I think Biden's toast, for example, but AOC is still an idealist. Both are dangerous and must be resisted,, but there may be hope for the latter. Just my thoughts.